本文選題：房地產(chǎn)業(yè)政策 + 制定權(quán)　； 參考：《福州大學(xué)》2014年碩士論文

【摘要】：當今中國,隨著房地產(chǎn)業(yè)的繁榮,在為經(jīng)濟發(fā)展做出重要貢獻的同時,也帶來了很多負效應(yīng)問題,如房價不斷上漲,且上漲的幅度遠遠高于其他物價上漲的幅度,中低收入人群買房難的問題越來越突出,房地產(chǎn)業(yè)資金緊缺,資金鏈有斷裂的危險等等,房地產(chǎn)業(yè)的危機趨勢也顯露出來,對此,政府運用貨幣政策、財稅政策、產(chǎn)業(yè)政策等對房地產(chǎn)市場展開了一系列的宏觀調(diào)控。許多學(xué)者在論及導(dǎo)致“住房難”、“購房難”等問題的時候,基本上都將原因歸結(jié)于投資過熱、房地產(chǎn)金融體系結(jié)構(gòu)和功能不完整、房地產(chǎn)方面的法律制度不健全、中央政府和地方政府在利益上存著著沖突、地方政府與房地產(chǎn)開發(fā)商之間的利益關(guān)聯(lián)等等,但是他們都忽略了作為房地產(chǎn)業(yè)政策的源頭——房地產(chǎn)業(yè)政策制定權(quán)在房地產(chǎn)業(yè)發(fā)展中的作用。房地產(chǎn)業(yè)政策作為一種調(diào)控型工具,它不僅可以在宏觀方面為房地產(chǎn)市場的發(fā)展方向作出引導(dǎo),還可以適當?shù)恼{(diào)節(jié)由于“市場失靈”現(xiàn)象造成的房地產(chǎn)市場方面的問題。那么究竟誰才是房地產(chǎn)業(yè)政策制定權(quán)的主體,在大多數(shù)涉及房地產(chǎn)業(yè)內(nèi)容的文章中并沒有明確的指出。事實上,房地產(chǎn)業(yè)政策制定權(quán)的一系列問題恰恰是造成房地產(chǎn)市場問題的主要根源。房地產(chǎn)業(yè)政策制定權(quán)的一系列問題,包括政策制定的主體問題、政策制定權(quán)的執(zhí)行與監(jiān)督問題等等。文本運用文獻研究、比較分析、列舉以及量化等方法,對房地產(chǎn)業(yè)的三大政策——貨幣政策、財稅政策、產(chǎn)業(yè)政策進行中外對比研究,結(jié)合各國國情、政治權(quán)力劃分等分析上述政策的制定權(quán)歸屬問題,強調(diào)法律的明確授權(quán),明確指出各個房地產(chǎn)業(yè)政策的制定主體、實施主體、監(jiān)督主體,特別是各國中央政府在宏觀上制定政策,地方政府在宏觀政策的范圍內(nèi)以及法律法規(guī)的授權(quán)范疇內(nèi),結(jié)合各地的實際情況,制定出適合本地區(qū)發(fā)展的房地產(chǎn)業(yè)政策的權(quán)限。在這些分析基礎(chǔ)上,結(jié)合我國國情,提出我國房地產(chǎn)業(yè)政策制定權(quán)的“主體應(yīng)然性”,并針對房地產(chǎn)業(yè)的貨幣政策、財稅政策和產(chǎn)業(yè)政策在中國語境下的制定權(quán)提出完善相關(guān)法律制度的建議。
[Abstract]:In today's China, with the prosperity of the real estate industry, while making important contributions to the economic development, it has also brought many negative effects, such as rising house prices, and the rate of increase is far higher than that of other price increases. The problem of low and middle income people's difficulty in buying a house is becoming more and more prominent, the real estate industry is in short supply of funds, the capital chain is in danger of breaking, and the crisis trend of the real estate industry has also been revealed. In view of this, the government has applied monetary policy, fiscal and tax policy, etc. Industrial policies and other real estate market launched a series of macro-control. When many scholars talk about the problems of "housing difficulty" and "housing purchase difficulty", they basically attribute the reasons to overinvestment, incomplete structure and function of real estate financial system, imperfect legal system in real estate, etc. There are conflicts of interest between the central government and the local government, the relationship between the interests of the local government and the real estate developers, and so on. But they all ignore the real estate policy as the source-real estate policy making right in the development of real estate. As a kind of adjusting and controlling tool, the real estate policy can not only guide the development direction of the real estate market in macroscopic aspect, but also adjust the problems of the real estate market caused by the phenomenon of "market failure". So who is the main body of the real estate policy-making right is not clearly pointed out in most articles concerning the real estate industry. In fact, a series of problems of real estate policy-making power are the main source of real estate market problems. A series of problems of real estate policy-making power, including the subject of policy-making, the implementation and supervision of policy-making power and so on. By using the methods of literature research, comparative analysis, enumeration and quantification, the paper makes a comparative study of the three major policies of real estate industry: monetary policy, fiscal policy and industrial policy, combining with the national conditions of various countries. The division of political power, etc., analyzes the ownership of the policy making power, emphasizes the clear authorization of the law, and points out clearly the main body of the formulation, implementation and supervision of each real estate policy. In particular, the central government of various countries formulates the policy on the macro level, and the local government, within the scope of the macro policy and the authorization of laws and regulations, combines the actual situation in various places to formulate the authority of the real estate policy suitable for the development of the region. On the basis of these analyses, combining with the situation of our country, this paper puts forward the "subject ought to be" of the right of policy making of real estate industry in our country, and aims at the monetary policy of real estate industry. The formulation of fiscal policy and industrial policy in Chinese context puts forward some suggestions to perfect the relevant legal system.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：福州大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2014
【分類號】：D912.3;D913

【相似文獻】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前7條

1 劉誠;;重整計劃制定權(quán)歸屬模式的比較研究[J];法學(xué)雜志;2010年05期

2 孫放;;我國會計信息話語權(quán)的法律完善路徑再思考——以權(quán)力的配置為中心[J];審計與經(jīng)濟研究;2009年04期

3 喻煊;;淺析證券監(jiān)管機構(gòu)規(guī)則制定權(quán)的授予問題——基于比較研究的視角[J];中國行政管理;2014年03期

4 陳海萍;國務(wù)院直屬機構(gòu)應(yīng)享有規(guī)章制定權(quán)[J];法學(xué)雜志;1997年01期

5 唐俊忠,段迎春;簡述作為基本概念的秩序與規(guī)則[J];河北師范大學(xué)學(xué)報(哲學(xué)社會科學(xué)版);2002年06期

6 殷竹筠;;高校行政管理中的規(guī)章制定權(quán)及其規(guī)制[J];湖北行政學(xué)院學(xué)報;2010年01期

7 ;[J];;年期

相關(guān)會議論文 前1條

1 劉誠;;重整計劃制定權(quán)歸屬模式的比較研究[A];當代法學(xué)論壇（2009年第1輯）[C];2009年

相關(guān)重要報紙文章 前10條

1 馮海寧　　;獨享制定權(quán)，也要給公眾參與機會[N];法制日報;2012年

2 高東生;日欲謀求網(wǎng)絡(luò)安全規(guī)則制定權(quán)[N];中國國防報;2013年

3 記者　段煜第 通訊員　周志慧;美的爭得冷熱飲水機行規(guī)制定權(quán)[N];深圳商報;2006年

4 本報記者 朱文達　梁麗;搶占標準制定權(quán)[N];中國質(zhì)量報;2011年

5 戴正宗 編譯;美非上市公司準則制定權(quán)爭奪硝煙正濃[N];中國會計報;2011年

6 寧波出入境檢驗檢疫局電氣安全檢測中心 王萬成;我國應(yīng)積極爭取LED國際標準制定權(quán)[N];中國電子報;2012年

7 張琛瑜;彭憲法到江麓視察[N];湘潭日報;2006年

8 ;寧波:五金類企業(yè)申報標準制定權(quán)[N];現(xiàn)代物流報;2007年

9 見習(xí)記者 馮超;惠州申請“較大的市” 專家稱民營經(jīng)濟沾光多[N];民營經(jīng)濟報;2014年

10 采訪整理 本報記者 崔寅 王驍波;大國爭奪全球公域規(guī)則制定權(quán)[N];人民日報;2014年

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前2條

1 陳玲丹;中外房產(chǎn)政策制定權(quán)的比較研究[D];福州大學(xué);2014年

2 張學(xué)英;高校規(guī)章制定權(quán)規(guī)制研究[D];西南政法大學(xué);2009年

，

本文編號：2078652