本文選題：物業(yè)管理 + 民事法律關(guān)系�。� 參考：《貴州民族大學(xué)》2013年碩士論文

【摘要】：伴隨著住房市場的改革與發(fā)展，我國對于房地產(chǎn)的管理也完成了由原有計劃經(jīng)濟體制下的行政管理到市場經(jīng)濟體制下的物業(yè)管理的轉(zhuǎn)變。然而，由于物業(yè)管理行業(yè)的發(fā)展尚未完全成熟，實踐中這一領(lǐng)域的糾紛也愈演愈烈，逐漸成為社會的熱點問題。這表明我國現(xiàn)有法律法規(guī)對于其性質(zhì)、地位以及其中各種事項的規(guī)定還存在著諸多不完善，不明確之處。為解決我國物業(yè)管理中若干法律問題，本文將分為三章進行論述。第一章對于物業(yè)管理的一般理論進行簡要的概述，明確物業(yè)管理的概念，指出物業(yè)管理的實質(zhì)是一種合同關(guān)系，屬于民法的范疇，并從物權(quán)與債權(quán)兩個角度論述物業(yè)管理的民事法律基礎(chǔ)。第二章從主體、客體、內(nèi)容三個方面對于物業(yè)管理民事法律關(guān)系進行分析，在其中將探討主體中業(yè)主的范圍，客體中物的范圍，以及各個主體的權(quán)利義務(wù)。第三章是我國物業(yè)管理中若干法律問題與對策研究，其中選取了理論與實踐上受到關(guān)注比較多的四個問題，第一個是業(yè)主大會與業(yè)主委員會的法律地位、組織運行與決議效力，在其中明確了業(yè)主委員會應(yīng)屬于非法人組織，，具有訴訟資格，并對于業(yè)主大會與業(yè)主委員會決議的效力與撤銷作了論述；第二個是住宅專項維修資金制度的重構(gòu)，首先對制度現(xiàn)狀作了簡要介紹，然后對其中存在的問題進行了分析，并給出了重構(gòu)的相關(guān)建議；第三個是物業(yè)管理公司收費標(biāo)準(zhǔn)問題，提出我國應(yīng)從立法層面對于物業(yè)管理收費標(biāo)準(zhǔn)進行明確規(guī)定，并對于政府指導(dǎo)價與市場調(diào)節(jié)價兩種價格安排的適用作了區(qū)分；第四個是物業(yè)管理公司的民事責(zé)任問題，在其中主要討論了物業(yè)管理公司違反安全保障義務(wù)而承擔(dān)責(zé)任的情況，論述了此時責(zé)任的性質(zhì)與類型。
[Abstract]:With the reform and development of the housing market, the management of real estate in our country has also completed the transformation from the administrative management under the original planned economy system to the real estate management under the market economy system. However, as the development of property management industry is not yet fully mature, the disputes in this field become increasingly fierce in practice, and gradually become a hot issue in the society. This indicates that there are still many imperfections and ambiguities in the existing laws and regulations concerning their nature, status and various matters. In order to solve some legal problems in property management in China, this paper will be divided into three chapters. The first chapter gives a brief overview of the general theory of property management, clarifies the concept of property management, and points out that the essence of property management is a contractual relationship, which belongs to the category of civil law. And discuss the civil legal basis of property management from two angles of real right and creditor's right. The second chapter analyzes the civil legal relationship of property management from three aspects: subject, object and content, in which the scope of owner, the scope of object, and the rights and obligations of each subject are discussed. The third chapter is the research of some legal problems and countermeasures in the property management of our country. The first is the legal status of the owners' Congress and the owners' committee, the organization operation and the validity of the resolution. Among them, it is clear that the owners' committee should be an unincorporated organization, which has the qualification of litigation, and discusses the validity and revocation of the resolution of the owners' Congress and the owners' committee. The second is the reconstruction of the residential special maintenance fund system. Firstly, this paper briefly introduces the current situation of the system, then analyzes the existing problems, and gives the relevant suggestions for reconstruction. The third is the issue of the charging standard of the property management company. It is pointed out that our country should make a clear stipulation on the charge standard of property management from the legislative level, and distinguish the application of the two kinds of price arrangement between the government guiding price and the market regulating price. The fourth is the civil liability of the property management company. It mainly discusses the responsibility of the property management company for violating the duty of safety and security, and discusses the nature and type of the responsibility at this time.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：貴州民族大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2013
【分類號】：D923.2

【參考文獻】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 徐晉;;物業(yè)服務(wù)合同性質(zhì)辨析[J];長春工業(yè)大學(xué)學(xué)報(社會科學(xué)版);2011年04期

2 王利明;;論業(yè)主的建筑物區(qū)分所有權(quán)的概念[J];當(dāng)代法學(xué);2006年05期

3 陳華彬;;業(yè)主大會法律制度探微[J];法學(xué);2011年03期

4 郭孝玲;王瑋;;住宅小區(qū)物業(yè)管理法律問題研究[J];法制與經(jīng)濟(中旬刊);2009年04期

5 樸琳琳;;重構(gòu)我國業(yè)主自治模式的新進路[J];法治論壇;2009年01期

6 王永勝;;業(yè)主之成員權(quán)問題探析[J];高等函授學(xué)報(哲學(xué)社會科學(xué)版);2009年08期

7 徐海燕;;論業(yè)主自治及物業(yè)管理制度之完善[J];今日財富(金融發(fā)展與監(jiān)管);2011年11期

8 李小博;;城市住宅小區(qū)業(yè)主自治法律問題探析[J];學(xué)理論;2009年08期

9 李曉艷;;對住宅小區(qū)物業(yè)管理的法治思考[J];山西高等學(xué)校社會科學(xué)學(xué)報;2009年03期

10 段宏磊;;賦予業(yè)主自治性機構(gòu)法律主體地位理論探究[J];十堰職業(yè)技術(shù)學(xué)院學(xué)報;2009年05期

本文編號：1995938