本文選題：預告登記 + 比較研究��； 參考：《復旦大學》2010年碩士論文

【摘要】：完備的登記制度不僅是財產交易有序化的條件,更是物權制度賴以生存的基礎。預告登記制度的創(chuàng)設就是為保全以不動產物權變動為內容的債權請求權將來得以實現為目的。該制度自定型于《德國民法典》后逐漸發(fā)展成為一項較為成熟的制度,并被許多國家及地區(qū)所普遍援引。2007年我國出臺的《物權法》首次將預告登記作為一項物權登記制度正式確立起來,然而作為一項嶄新的制度如何能在我國法制土壤上更好的開花結果,尚有許多問題有待厘清和解決。本文從理論分析角度入手界定不動產預告登記的概念及性質,對其法律價值及效力進行評析。通過與國外先進立法經驗的比較考察,進一步探討我國預告登記制度的存在的不足并對其完善提出自己的見解。全文共分六個部分： 第一部分為不動產預告登記的概念界定。預告登記是指當事人所期待的不動產物權變動因條件尚未成就而不能為終局登記前,為保全對未來取得物權的請求權或其順位而自愿進行的暫時性登記。該制度發(fā)源于大陸法系的德國,后來為日本、瑞士等國以及我國臺灣地區(qū)民法所繼受,成為民法中的一項重要的物權制度。區(qū)別于本登記和異議登記,預告登記具有從屬性、暫時性等特點。其分類主要有：實體預告登記與程序預告登記、狹義預告登記與廣義預告登記、單方預告登記與雙方預告登記。 第二部分為不動產預告登記制度的比較研究。通過分析德國、瑞士、日本以及我國臺灣地區(qū)預告登記制度的現行法律規(guī)定及自身特點,歸納出各國及地區(qū)的預告登記制度在適用范圍、發(fā)起途徑、效力模式等方面的五點規(guī)律性啟示。這些啟示值得我國在立法完善過程中予以借鑒。 第三部分為不動產預告登記的法律價值。關于預告登記的法律性質,學術界爭議較大。具體可歸納為：物權說、準物權說、債權說、債權物權化說、中間型權利說這五種。本文通過分析論證認定其性質仍為債權。任何一項法律制度的內涵都有特定的價值取向,它是指導該制度立法與司法的根本內容,預告登記制度也不例外。其價值體現為：秩序價值、公平價值、效率價值、自由價值、安全價值。 第四部分為不動產預告登記的效力評析。效力是預告登記的核心問題,也是各國法律規(guī)定和學者研究的重點。預告登記的效力立法模式主要包括“禁止其后的登記主義”、“禁止登記名義人再為處分主義”和“相對無效主義”三種,但各國基本采用“相對無效主義”的效力模式。預告登記的效力主要包括保全權利效力、保全順位效力、破產保護效力和預警效力四種。 第五部分為我國預告登記制度的歷史沿革。在《物權法》頒布之前,商品房預售登記備案制度和一些地方性法規(guī)對預告登記制度進行初步的探索,為我國全面完善預告登記制度奠定了基礎。2007年出臺的《物權法》第20條明確規(guī)定預告登記制度,使得我國關于不動產登記的規(guī)定又向前邁進了歷史性一步,其內涵與價值得到學界的肯定。此后頒布實施的《房屋登記辦法》彌補了《物權法》過于籠統(tǒng)的缺陷,使房屋預告登記制度邁上了一個新臺階。至此,我國不動產預告登記制度的框架初步搭建起來。 第六部分為預告登記制度的立法完善。作為立法上的首次嘗試,預告登記制度具有很高的制度價值。但由于在各項規(guī)定上的不完備,使得其在實踐中運用效果不盡人意。針對以上諸多缺憾,本文在分析探討的基礎上,結合現行的立法模式并借鑒國外先進立法經驗,對預告登記制度在立法體例的選擇、具體規(guī)定的完善及實踐操作的落實等方面提出了自己的見解。
[Abstract]:The complete registration system is not only the condition of the orderly property transaction, but also the basis for the survival of the real right system. The creation of the notice registration system is to achieve the realization of the claim for the preservation of the right of the change of real property right. The system has gradually developed into a mature after the "German Civil Code". In many countries and regions, it was widely quoted in many countries and regions for the first time that the property law, which was introduced by our country in.2007, was formally established as a registration system of real right. However, as a new system, how can we make better results in the legal soil of our country, there are still many problems to be clarified and solved. From the angle of analysis, the concept and nature of the real estate notice registration are defined, and its legal value and effectiveness are evaluated. Through the comparison with the advanced foreign legislative experience, this paper further probes into the shortcomings of the existing registration system in China and puts forward his own opinions on its perfection. The whole article is divided into six parts:
The first part is the definition of the registration of the immovable property. The pre registration is the temporary registration of the change of the real property right of the real property expected by the parties, which has not yet been achieved for the final registration, for the purpose of obtaining the right of the future acquisition of real right or its position. Japan, Switzerland and other countries, as well as the civil law of the Taiwan region, become an important property right system in civil law. It is distinguished from the registration and dissenting registration, and the notice registration has the characteristics of from the attribute and the temporary. Its classification mainly includes the entity preview registration and the procedure notice registration, the narrow notice registration and the generalized advance notice registration, the unilateral advance notice. Registration and registration of both sides.
The second part is the comparative study of the system of the registration of the real estate. Through the analysis of the current legal provisions and its own characteristics of the pre registration system in Germany, Switzerland, Japan and the Taiwan area of China, it concludes the five regular revelations in the scope of application, the way and the model of the validity of the pre registration system in various countries and regions. It is worth our reference in the process of legislation improvement.
The third part is the legal value of the registration of the real estate. On the legal nature of the notice registration, the academic circles have a great dispute. It can be summed up in the following aspects: the theory of real right, the theory of quasi real right, the claim of right, the theory of right right in the right to claim, the five kinds of right in the middle type. There is a specific value orientation, which is the basic content to guide the legislation and the judicature of the system, and the pre registration system is no exception. Its value is the value of order, fair value, efficiency value, free value and security value.
The fourth part is the evaluation and analysis of the validity of the registration of the real estate. The validity is the core issue of the pre registration and the focus of the legal provisions of various countries and the research of the scholars. The legislative mode of the validity of the notice registration mainly includes the "Prohibition of the subsequent registering", "the prohibition of registering nominates again" and "relative inefficiency", but three kinds, The effectiveness model of "relative inefficiency" is basically adopted by all countries. The effect of preview registration mainly includes the effectiveness of preservation of rights, the effectiveness of preservation, the effectiveness of bankruptcy protection and the effectiveness of early warning four.
The fifth part is the historical evolution of the pre registration system in China. Before the enactment of the property law, the system of registration and record of the pre sale registration of commercial housing and some local laws and regulations have been carried out preliminarily, which laid a foundation for the comprehensive improvement of the pre registration system in China for the first.2007 year of the "property law > twentieth" The definition of the registration of real property in China has made a historic step forward, and its connotation and value have been affirmed by the academic circle. The implementation of the housing registration method has made up for the overly general defects of the property law and made the registration system of housing advance a new step. At this point, the system of the registration of real estate in China The framework was initially set up.
The sixth part is the legislative perfection of the pre registration system. As the first attempt in the legislation, the pre registration system has a high institutional value. However, due to the incompleteness of various regulations, it makes it unsatisfactory in practice. On the basis of the analysis of the above shortcomings, this paper combines the current legislative model with the current legislative model. And drawing on the foreign advanced legislative experience, the author puts forward his own opinions on the selection of the legislative body of the notice registration system, the perfection of the specific provisions and the implementation of the practice.
【學位授予單位】：復旦大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2010
【分類號】：D923.2

【引證文獻】

相關期刊論文 前1條

1 李陽;;預告登記制度相關問題探討[J];法制與社會;2013年01期

相關碩士學位論文 前1條

1 石紅遠;論預告登記制度[D];華東政法大學;2012年

，

本文編號：1991846