本文選題：不動(dòng)產(chǎn) + 異議登記��； 參考：《華東政法大學(xué)》2014年碩士論文

【摘要】：我國的不動(dòng)產(chǎn)異議登記制度在《物權(quán)法》以及《房屋登記辦法》等法律法規(guī)上介紹的十分籠統(tǒng)，致使理論界眾說紛紜，實(shí)務(wù)操作中“千姿百態(tài)”，長(zhǎng)此以往，勢(shì)必消磨司法的權(quán)威。因此理論界與實(shí)務(wù)界有必要統(tǒng)一口徑，，厘清理論上的盤根錯(cuò)節(jié)，方能在實(shí)務(wù)中做到明確操作程序，最大限度的保護(hù)權(quán)利人的合法權(quán)益，也為房地產(chǎn)市場(chǎng)掃清制度障礙，從而促進(jìn)我國經(jīng)濟(jì)的健康發(fā)展。本文以典型案例為視角，以理論以及實(shí)務(wù)操作中出現(xiàn)的爭(zhēng)議焦點(diǎn)為源頭，對(duì)我國的不動(dòng)產(chǎn)異議登記制度號(hào)脈問診，以求不動(dòng)產(chǎn)異議登記制度的相關(guān)理論與實(shí)務(wù)達(dá)到統(tǒng)一。 本文除去引言和結(jié)語，分為三大章： 第一章是異議登記的申請(qǐng)。本章分為四個(gè)小節(jié)。分別為：異議登記申請(qǐng)人的范圍，權(quán)利人不同意更正是否為異議登記的前置要件？異議登記的申請(qǐng)限制，注銷登記依申請(qǐng)還是依職權(quán)。通過剖析理論以及實(shí)務(wù)中的爭(zhēng)議，尋找定紛止?fàn)幍慕鉀Q方案。 第二、三兩章是本文的重點(diǎn)，將異議登記制度的效力以及不動(dòng)產(chǎn)異議登記糾紛下導(dǎo)致的不動(dòng)產(chǎn)糾紛案的訴訟程序的選擇為研究對(duì)象。以典型案例為切入點(diǎn)，一一分析實(shí)務(wù)與理論之間的爭(zhēng)議焦點(diǎn)，明悉當(dāng)前立法缺陷以及立法空白所導(dǎo)致的實(shí)務(wù)操作中的困境，并對(duì)異議登記制度的健全完善作出超前探討，同時(shí)提出可行性方案。希望嘗試不動(dòng)產(chǎn)登記制度在理論闡釋能與實(shí)務(wù)操作達(dá)到無縫對(duì)接。
[Abstract]:The real estate objection registration system in our country is very general in the laws and regulations, such as the Real right Law and the method of Housing Registration, which leads to different opinions in the theoretical circle and "various forms" in the practical operation. The authority of the judiciary is bound to diminish. Therefore, it is necessary for the theoretical and practical circles to unify their calibre and clarify the theoretical intersections in order to make clear the operating procedures in practice, to maximize the protection of the legitimate rights and interests of the right holders, and to clear up the system obstacles for the real estate market. In order to promote the healthy development of our economy. From the perspective of typical cases and with the focus of disputes in theory and practice as the source, this paper makes inquiries into the real estate objection registration system in our country, in order to achieve the unity of the relevant theory and practice of the real estate objection registration system. Apart from the introduction and conclusion, this paper is divided into three chapters: The first chapter is the application of objection registration. This chapter is divided into four sections. Respectively: the scope of the applicant for objection registration, the obligee does not agree to correct whether the pre-registration of objection requirements? Limitation of application for dissenting registration, cancellation of registration shall be subject to application or authority. Through the analysis of the theory and practice of disputes, to find a solution to resolve disputes. Second, chapter three and two are the focus of this paper, the effectiveness of the objection registration system and the real estate disputes caused by the dispute of real estate disputes under the choice of real estate disputes as the object of study. Taking typical cases as the starting point, this paper analyzes the dispute focus between practice and theory one by one, finds out the current legislative defects and the difficulties in practical operation caused by the blank legislation, and probes into the perfection and perfection of the dissent registration system ahead of time. At the same time, the feasibility scheme is proposed. I hope to try the real estate registration system in theoretical interpretation and practical operation to achieve seamless docking.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：華東政法大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2014
【分類號(hào)】：D923.2

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前7條

1 王富博;不動(dòng)產(chǎn)登記瑕疵的法律救濟(jì)——兼評(píng)《中華人民共和國物權(quán)法(草案)》的有關(guān)規(guī)定[J];法律適用;2005年02期

2 吳偕林;;民事、行政救濟(jì)程序交叉問題之解決[J];法律適用;2007年07期

3 劉保玉;;異議登記與財(cái)產(chǎn)保全關(guān)系的處理模式及其選擇[J];法商研究;2007年05期

4 程嘯;;論不動(dòng)產(chǎn)善意取得之構(gòu)成要件——《中華人民共和國物權(quán)法》第106條釋義[J];法商研究;2010年05期

5 尹飛;李倩;;異議登記申請(qǐng)四論——《房屋登記辦法》研討之八[J];中國房地產(chǎn);2008年11期

6 劉璐;高圣平;;解釋論視野下的不動(dòng)產(chǎn)登記錯(cuò)誤的司法救濟(jì)——從民事訴訟和行政訴訟交錯(cuò)的視角[J];海南大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(人文社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2011年06期

7 程嘯;;不動(dòng)產(chǎn)登記簿之推定力[J];法學(xué)研究;2010年03期

本文編號(hào)：1834374