本文選題：不動(dòng)產(chǎn)　切入點(diǎn)：登記　出處：《華東政法大學(xué)》2014年碩士論文

【摘要】：《中華人民共和國(guó)物權(quán)法》第10條規(guī)定：國(guó)家對(duì)不動(dòng)產(chǎn)實(shí)行統(tǒng)一登記制度。并規(guī)定統(tǒng)一登記的操作辦法由法律、行政法規(guī)規(guī)定。從理論角度觀察，登記是不動(dòng)產(chǎn)物權(quán)變動(dòng)的公示手段，也是不動(dòng)產(chǎn)登記制度的主要價(jià)值。從實(shí)踐角度觀察，，房地產(chǎn)登記制度可以使當(dāng)事人及第三人了解房地產(chǎn)的權(quán)屬狀況，保護(hù)房地產(chǎn)交易的安全，維護(hù)系統(tǒng)交易秩序。同時(shí)，健全不動(dòng)產(chǎn)登記制度、建立不動(dòng)產(chǎn)統(tǒng)一登記制度也可以是政府有效調(diào)控房地產(chǎn)市場(chǎng)的重要前提，是國(guó)務(wù)院機(jī)構(gòu)改革和職能轉(zhuǎn)變的重要內(nèi)容，也是推進(jìn)簡(jiǎn)政放權(quán)、解決多頭管理帶來(lái)的弊端、實(shí)現(xiàn)統(tǒng)一管理的重要舉措，對(duì)于保護(hù)權(quán)利人財(cái)產(chǎn)權(quán)，提高政府依法執(zhí)政水平具有重要意義。 我國(guó)在不動(dòng)產(chǎn)登記制度的實(shí)施過程中暴露了許多問題，表現(xiàn)為：登記機(jī)關(guān)多頭管理、登記模式混亂、登記的效力模糊、登記賠償及保險(xiǎn)制度不完善、登記行為合法性審查標(biāo)準(zhǔn)不明確等等。這一系列的問題使得不動(dòng)產(chǎn)登記制度的完善迫在眉睫。2013年3月出臺(tái)了《國(guó)務(wù)院機(jī)構(gòu)改革和職能轉(zhuǎn)變方案》，其重要目標(biāo)之一就是要建立不動(dòng)產(chǎn)統(tǒng)一登記制度，并提出要在2014年6月底前出臺(tái)《不動(dòng)產(chǎn)登記條例》。為此，國(guó)土資源部牽頭起草了《不動(dòng)產(chǎn)登記條例（草案送審稿）》，國(guó)務(wù)院法制辦公室以此稿為基礎(chǔ)，征求了有關(guān)方面的意見，形成了《不動(dòng)產(chǎn)登記暫行條例（征求意見稿）》，并于當(dāng)年8月15日將征求意見稿全文公布，公開征求意見。征求意見稿貫徹了登記機(jī)構(gòu)、登記簿冊(cè)、登記依據(jù)和信息平臺(tái)四統(tǒng)一精神，確立了整合職責(zé)、物權(quán)穩(wěn)定、方便群眾和嚴(yán)格管理的基本原則。征求意見稿主要內(nèi)容圍繞登記機(jī)構(gòu)、登記簿冊(cè)、登記程序以及關(guān)于登記信息共享與保護(hù)四個(gè)方面進(jìn)行規(guī)范。 從比較法視角觀察，日本、德國(guó)等國(guó)不動(dòng)產(chǎn)登記制度的立法相對(duì)比較完善，是研究借鑒不動(dòng)產(chǎn)登記制度較好的參考范本。本文將對(duì)日本、德國(guó)不動(dòng)產(chǎn)登記制度比較有特色的部分進(jìn)行闡述和探究，旨在對(duì)我國(guó)不動(dòng)產(chǎn)登記制度的完善提出些許建議。 第一章主要是概括不動(dòng)產(chǎn)登記制度概念、類型等，對(duì)不動(dòng)產(chǎn)登記制度這一基本法律制度進(jìn)行概括描述，在此基礎(chǔ)上，對(duì)我國(guó)不動(dòng)產(chǎn)登記制度的現(xiàn)狀、歷史沿革、存在問題、發(fā)展趨勢(shì)以及立法等進(jìn)行闡述和分析。 第二章主要是從比較法的視角分析日本、德國(guó)不動(dòng)產(chǎn)登記制度的比較有特色的規(guī)定，在分析比較的基礎(chǔ)上提出我國(guó)不動(dòng)產(chǎn)登記制度可以借鑒的部分，并對(duì)此種借鑒進(jìn)行理論上的分析，以期能夠提出借鑒的理論依據(jù)。 第三章主要是對(duì)我國(guó)剛剛公布的《不動(dòng)產(chǎn)登記暫行條例（征求意見稿）》進(jìn)行評(píng)析，在評(píng)論分析的基礎(chǔ)上提出征求意見稿存在的問題并提出及修改建議，希望為立法進(jìn)一步完善提供些許參考意見。
[Abstract]:Article 10 of the property Law of the people's Republic of China stipulates that the state shall implement a unified registration system for immovable property.The operation method of unified registration shall be prescribed by laws and administrative regulations.From the theoretical point of view, registration is the public means of real estate property change, and also the main value of real estate registration system.From the practical point of view, the real estate registration system can make the parties and the third party understand the status of real estate ownership, protect the security of real estate transactions, and maintain the system transaction order.At the same time, perfecting the real estate registration system and establishing a unified real estate registration system can also be an important prerequisite for the government to effectively regulate the real estate market, an important content of the State Council's institutional reform and functional transformation, and also an important part of promoting the decentralization of power from government to government.It is of great significance to solve the malpractice brought by multi-head management and realize the important measure of unified management for protecting the property rights of the obligee and improving the level of the government ruling according to law.In the course of the implementation of the real estate registration system, many problems have been exposed in our country, such as: the multi-head management of the registration authority, the confusion of the registration mode, the vagueness of the effectiveness of the registration, the imperfection of the registration compensation and insurance system.The standard of legality examination of registration act is not clear and so on.This series of problems make the perfection of the real estate registration system urgent. In March 2013, the State Council Program for Institutional Reform and functional Transformation was issued. One of its important objectives is to establish a unified registration system for real estate.And proposed to be issued by the end of June 2014, Real Estate Registration regulations.To this end, the Ministry of Land and Resources took the lead in drafting the regulations on Registration of Real Estate (draft draft for Review), on which the legal Affairs Office of the State Council sought the views of relevant parties.Provisional regulations on Registration of Real Estate (draft for solicitation of opinions) were formed, and the full text of the draft of soliciting opinions was published on August 15 of that year for public consultation.The draft of soliciting opinions has carried out the spirit of registration organization, register book, registration basis and information platform, established the basic principles of conformity duty, property right stability, convenience to the masses and strict management.The main contents of the draft for solicitation of opinions are centered on four aspects: registration organization, register register, registration procedure and the sharing and protection of registration information.From the perspective of comparative law, the legislation of real estate registration system in Japan, Germany and other countries is relatively perfect, which is a good reference model for studying and drawing lessons from real estate registration system.This paper will expound and explore the characteristic parts of the real estate registration system in Japan and Germany in order to put forward some suggestions for the perfection of the real estate registration system in our country.The first chapter is to summarize the concept and types of real estate registration system, to describe the basic legal system of real estate registration system, on the basis of which, the current situation, historical evolution and existing problems of real estate registration system in China are discussed.The development trend and legislation are expounded and analyzed.The second chapter is mainly from the perspective of comparative law to analyze the Japanese and German real estate registration system has the characteristics of the provisions, on the basis of analysis and comparison of the real estate registration system in China can be used for reference.And this kind of reference carries on the theoretical analysis in order to be able to put forward the theoretical basis for reference.The third chapter mainly analyzes the interim regulations on Registration of Real Estate (draft for opinions), which has just been published in China. Based on the analysis of the comments, it puts forward the problems existing in the draft of solicitation of opinions and puts forward some suggestions to amend them.I hope to provide some reference for the further improvement of legislation.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：華東政法大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2014
【分類號(hào)】：D923.2

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 黃輝;中國(guó)不動(dòng)產(chǎn)登記制度的立法思考[J];北京科技大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2001年03期

2 楊立新;;論不動(dòng)產(chǎn)錯(cuò)誤登記損害賠償責(zé)任的性質(zhì)[J];當(dāng)代法學(xué);2010年01期

3 王洪亮;不動(dòng)產(chǎn)物權(quán)登記立法研究[J];法律科學(xué).西北政法學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2000年02期

4 常鵬翱;;不動(dòng)產(chǎn)登記法的立法定位與展望[J];法學(xué);2010年03期

5 司澤楠;;完善我國(guó)不動(dòng)產(chǎn)登記的若干思考[J];法制與社會(huì);2014年01期

6 屈茂輝;;不動(dòng)產(chǎn)登記申請(qǐng)的法理與規(guī)則[J];法學(xué)研究;2007年02期

7 吳一鳴;;論美國(guó)不動(dòng)產(chǎn)登記之公信力[J];交大法學(xué);2014年01期

8 王利明;試論我國(guó)不動(dòng)產(chǎn)登記制度的完善(上)[J];求索;2001年05期

9 熊文釗;郭晉;;論不動(dòng)產(chǎn)登記行為的法律屬性[J];法治論叢(上海政法學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào));2007年06期

10 王崇敏;我國(guó)不動(dòng)產(chǎn)登記制度若干問題探討[J];中國(guó)法學(xué);2003年02期

本文編號(hào)：1701466