本文關(guān)鍵詞：張南華案的法律分析　出處：《蘭州大學(xué)》2013年碩士論文　論文類型：學(xué)位論文

  更多相關(guān)文章： 民間高利貸 高利貸犯罪 非法經(jīng)營罪 高利轉(zhuǎn)貸罪

【摘要】：房地產(chǎn)商突然失蹤,業(yè)主集體上訪,不料卻引出背后的高利貸黑幕。這就是常德首例以非法經(jīng)營罪拘捕的高利貸案件。張南華及其南華公司以合作開發(fā)為幌子進(jìn)行非法高利貸業(yè)務(wù),收取利息之高直接造成多家房地產(chǎn)公司資金鏈斷裂,進(jìn)而走向破產(chǎn)倒閉,其追討債務(wù)的手段也極端、多樣。張南華及其南華公司的高利放貸行為社會(huì)影響極其惡劣。當(dāng)前社會(huì)中類似于本案的高利貸案件頗多,社會(huì)各界對此爭議也很大。究其原因,除了市場經(jīng)濟(jì)飛速發(fā)展導(dǎo)致企業(yè)的資金需求量大且民間閑散資金多以外,最主要的恐怕是法律制度在高利貸方面的缺失導(dǎo)致了民間高利貸的泛濫。 本文從張南華案入手,通過對案情的分析,結(jié)合民間高利貸與一般的民間借貸的比較,分析張南華及其南華公司的罪與非罪；司法機(jī)關(guān)最終以非法經(jīng)營罪對被告進(jìn)行批捕,學(xué)術(shù)界對此是有爭議的。通過對非法經(jīng)營罪犯罪構(gòu)成的詳細(xì)闡述,結(jié)合高利貸犯罪量刑尺度,對是否應(yīng)該以非法經(jīng)營罪對此類高利貸犯罪進(jìn)行定罪進(jìn)行分析。通過對本案的進(jìn)一步思考,對高利借貸犯罪的定罪量刑進(jìn)行思考,進(jìn)而提出相關(guān)的法律制度的建議。 全文主體共分為三個(gè)部分。第一部分是案情的簡要介紹及爭議問題的提出,第二部分重點(diǎn)對案例的爭議問題進(jìn)行分析闡述并表明筆者觀點(diǎn)。第三部分基于第二部分中對民間高利貸的現(xiàn)狀、相關(guān)的法律法規(guī)的研究對高利貸犯罪的定罪量刑及法律規(guī)定的不足之處進(jìn)行思考與設(shè)想,對與高利貸犯罪相關(guān)的其他罪名進(jìn)行了區(qū)分,希望能夠?qū)γ耖g高利借貸的法律完善提供有效參考。
[Abstract]:The real estate business suddenly disappeared, the owner collective petition. This is Changde's first case of usury arrested for the crime of illegal operation. Zhang Nanhua and his South China company engaged in illegal usury under the guise of cooperative development. The high rate of interest directly causes many real estate companies to break the capital chain and then go bankrupt, and the means to recover debts are also extreme. Various. Zhang Nanhua and his company's high-interest lending behavior social impact is extremely bad. In the current society similar to the case of usury cases quite a lot, the community is also very controversial about this. Investigate the reasons. In addition to the rapid development of the market economy leading to a large demand for capital and private idle funds, the most important is the lack of legal system in the aspect of usury, resulting in the proliferation of private usury. This article starts with Zhang Nanhua case, through the analysis of the case, combines the folk usury and the general folk loan, analyzes Zhang Nanhua and its Nanhua company's crime and not the crime; The judicial organ finally carries on the approval arrest to the defendant with the illegal operation crime, which is disputed by the academic circles. Through the detailed elaboration to the illegal business crime constitution, unifies the loan sharking crime sentencing standard. This article analyzes whether the crime of illegal operation should be used to convict the crime of usury. Through further thinking on this case, the author thinks about the conviction and sentencing of the crime of profiteering and lending. And then put forward the relevant legal system recommendations. The main body of the paper is divided into three parts. The first part is the brief introduction of the case and the proposal of the dispute. The second part focuses on the case of the dispute and the author's point of view. The third part is based on the second part of the current situation of private usury. The study of relevant laws and regulations on the conviction and sentencing of usury crime and legal provisions of the deficiencies of thinking and imagination, and the other offences related to usury crime were differentiated. I hope to be able to provide effective reference to the legal improvement of private high-profit lending.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：蘭州大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2013
【分類號】：D924.33

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 付麗芳;;民間高利貸不應(yīng)當(dāng)入罪[J];法制與社會(huì);2009年12期

2 樊蓉;袁雪娣;;民間高利放貸行為能否成立非法經(jīng)營罪[J];法制與社會(huì);2012年08期

3 張永萍;;民間借貸引發(fā)犯罪問題淺析[J];法制與社會(huì);2012年13期

4 沈驥;;中小企業(yè)融資困境及民間借貸行為博弈分析[J];合作經(jīng)濟(jì)與科技;2012年02期

5 趙文明;吳林芳;;特大地下錢莊涉案數(shù)億 拖垮多家地產(chǎn)公司——湖南以非法經(jīng)營罪批捕首例高利貸案[J];農(nóng)村.農(nóng)業(yè).農(nóng)民(B版);2010年02期

6 萬國海;;高利貸行為能否入罪[J];河北法學(xué);2012年12期

7 楊怡敏;;中日高利貸比較與法律控制[J];前沿;2011年06期

8 王紹旺;;論民間高利貸域外法律規(guī)制及其對我國的法律啟示[J];求索;2012年02期

9 陳澤憲;非法經(jīng)營罪若干問題研究[J];人民檢察;2000年02期

10 李森;陳燁;;“民間高利貸”的性質(zhì)界定與刑法規(guī)制[J];十堰職業(yè)技術(shù)學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2011年06期

相關(guān)重要報(bào)紙文章 前3條

1 蘇州市虎丘區(qū)人民法院 邱黎黎　張留兵;[N];人民法院報(bào);2009年

2 江蘇省金湖縣人民法院 黃建波;[N];人民法院報(bào);2009年

3 劉慶傳;[N];新華日報(bào);2009年

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前3條

1 張璐璐;民間借貸的若干法律問題之探討[D];華東政法大學(xué);2011年

2 婁秋琴;論對非法經(jīng)營罪堵漏條款適用的合理限制[D];中國政法大學(xué);2006年

3 耿雪敏;唐代的民間高利貸[D];云南師范大學(xué);2007年

，

本文編號：1433631