本文關(guān)鍵詞：城市房屋拆遷合同履行問題研究　出處：《中央民族大學》2017年碩士論文　論文類型：學位論文

  更多相關(guān)文章： 城市房屋拆遷 補償安置協(xié)議 延期交房 房屋質(zhì)量 公共部分

【摘要】：近年來,隨著城市化建設(shè)速度的加快,舊城改造、新城建設(shè)項目層出不窮。由于一線城市房地產(chǎn)市場逐漸呈現(xiàn)飽和狀態(tài),轉(zhuǎn)戰(zhàn)二三線城市的房地產(chǎn)市場成為眾多開發(fā)商的選擇。二三線城市雖然具有國家政策支持,且本身具有一定的資源優(yōu)勢,但是住房剛性需求不足是無法避免的事實。開發(fā)商開發(fā)規(guī)模過大,當?shù)鼐用褡》抠徺I力不足,使得資金無法快速回收,造成安置房屋無法按時完成建設(shè),出現(xiàn)大批爛尾樓。而且,房地產(chǎn)市場的崩潰,房價的大幅下跌,造成眾多拆遷戶意欲借助開發(fā)商無法交房等違約行為解除房屋拆遷補償安置協(xié)議,以避免損失的擴大。開發(fā)商陷入了既無足夠資金繼續(xù)建設(shè)房屋,又無能力賠償拆遷戶損失的兩難境地。在這樣的情況下,妥善解決開發(fā)商和拆遷戶之間的糾紛迫在眉睫,因為這不僅關(guān)涉到當事人的權(quán)利是否能夠得到合法救濟,而且也牽涉到社會的和諧和穩(wěn)定、法律維護的公平正義精神能否體現(xiàn)在每一個案件中。雖然目前部分城市采取了一系列措施如"房票"等制度來解決住房庫存問題,但這些措施主要針對的是已建成的房屋,對于開發(fā)商和拆遷戶之間因為爛尾房等問題引起的糾紛并無針對性措施。筆者從二三線城市房地產(chǎn)發(fā)展現(xiàn)狀這一實際情況出發(fā),梳理出當前拆遷補償安置協(xié)議履行過程中出現(xiàn)的典型問題,其中主要包括延期交房、房屋質(zhì)量、房屋初裝修質(zhì)量以及房屋公共部分的問題,這些問題主要是圍繞拆遷補償安置協(xié)議的主要標的——房屋,其問題的實質(zhì)關(guān)涉到合同成立的目的是否能夠真正實現(xiàn),關(guān)涉到拆遷戶的合同利益能否實現(xiàn)。筆者在查閱了大量的相關(guān)案件、文獻和法律資料之后,通過認真研讀、歸納整理、比較分析等方式詳細研究了各個典型問題的本質(zhì)。在提出具體的解決之道之前,本文對于研究問題的范圍進行了界定,明確問題包含的不同方面和類型,然后依次分析不同類型的問題中雙方當事人違約行為的原因力大小、違約行為對權(quán)利的損害程度以及其他影響因素。本文提出的解除方法亦是本著嚴守合同原則,在合同能夠得以維持和履行的情況下,要求違約方繼續(xù)履行合同,對于違約行為產(chǎn)生的損失由違約方根據(jù)法律規(guī)定和實際情況進行賠償,只有在違約行為嚴重影響到了合同目的實現(xiàn)的情況下,才允許開發(fā)商和拆遷戶解除房屋補償安置協(xié)議。期望本文對于補償協(xié)議履行中出現(xiàn)問題的歸納和解決方法的提出,能夠為以后其他城市房地產(chǎn)出現(xiàn)類似糾紛的解決提供參考和借鑒。
[Abstract]:In recent years, with the acceleration of urbanization and the transformation of the old city, new city construction projects emerge in endlessly. As the real estate market in first-tier cities gradually presents saturation state. The real estate market of the second and third tier cities has become the choice of many developers. Although the second and third tier cities have national policy support, they have certain resource advantages. However, the lack of rigid demand for housing is inevitable. Developers development scale is too large, local residents' purchasing power is insufficient, so that the funds can not be recovered quickly, resulting in resettlement houses can not be completed on time. There are a large number of uncompleted flats. Moreover, the collapse of the real estate market, house prices fell sharply, resulting in a large number of demolition tenants want to help developers unable to pay the house such as default behavior to remove the housing demolition compensation and resettlement agreement. In order to avoid the expansion of losses. Developers have neither enough funds to continue to build houses, nor the ability to compensate for the loss of demolition. In this case. It is urgent to properly resolve the disputes between developers and demolition tenants, because it not only concerns whether the rights of the parties can get legal relief, but also involves the harmony and stability of the society. Whether the spirit of fairness and justice maintained by law can be reflected in every case. Although some cities have taken a series of measures such as "housing ticket" system to solve the housing inventory problem. But these measures are mainly aimed at completed housing. There are no targeted measures for the disputes between developers and demolition households due to problems such as rotting end houses. The author proceeds from the actual situation of the development of real estate in the second and third tier cities. Sort out the typical problems in the process of implementation of the current relocation compensation and resettlement agreement, which mainly include the delay of housing delivery, the quality of housing, the quality of the initial decoration of the house and the housing public part of the problem. These problems mainly revolve around the main target of the relocation compensation and resettlement agreement-housing, the essence of which concerns whether the purpose of contract formation can be really realized. The author consulted a large number of relevant cases, literature and legal materials, through careful study, summarized and sorted out. Comparative analysis and other methods of detailed study of the nature of each typical problem. Before putting forward a specific solution, this paper defines the scope of the research problem, clear the different aspects and types of the problem. Then it analyzes the force of the parties' breach of contract in different types of problems in turn. Breach of contract on the degree of damage to rights and other factors. The method proposed in this article is to strictly abide by the principle of contract, in the case of the contract can be maintained and performed, the party in breach of contract to continue to perform the contract. For the loss caused by breach of contract by the party in breach of contract according to the provisions of the law and the actual situation compensation only if the breach of contract seriously affected the realization of the purpose of the contract. It is expected that this paper will sum up and solve the problems in the implementation of the compensation agreement. Can provide reference and reference for other cities real estate similar dispute settlement.
【學位授予單位】：中央民族大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2017
【分類號】：D922.297;D923.6

【參考文獻】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 潘軍鋒;;商品房買賣合同審判新類型問題研究[J];法律適用;2015年08期

2 孫小虎;;結(jié)合案例小議房屋拆遷案件中的財產(chǎn)損害賠償問題[J];法制與社會;2013年33期

3 杜鳳霞;楊占昌;陳立文;;房地產(chǎn)市場區(qū)域性特征探索[J];企業(yè)經(jīng)濟;2013年02期

4 中國人民銀行鄂爾多斯市中心支行課題組;于明春;敖利軍;;破解鄂爾多斯民間借貸與房地產(chǎn)企業(yè)債務(wù)困局的對策建議[J];內(nèi)蒙古金融研究;2013年01期

5 彭日東;康雪雁;;鄂爾多斯市房地產(chǎn)情況調(diào)查[J];內(nèi)蒙古金融研究;2012年09期

6 李建華;彭誠信;;論合同相對性原則在處理商品房買賣合同糾紛中的司法適用——基于最高人民法院相關(guān)司法解釋及其判決的評判和反思[J];法律科學(西北政法大學學報);2012年05期

7 李斌;;鄂爾多斯市房地產(chǎn)市場價格策略研究[J];內(nèi)蒙古財經(jīng)學院學報(綜合版);2012年01期

8 江帆;丁麗柏;馬勇;孫曉峰;張良培;;重慶市沙坪壩區(qū)房屋拆遷問題及對策研究[J];經(jīng)濟法論壇;2012年00期

9 鄒韻;;中國城市房地產(chǎn)市場現(xiàn)狀及發(fā)展趨勢研究[J];商業(yè)文化(下半月);2011年02期

10 于濤;趙堅;徐志銳;趙杰;;論征地房屋拆遷的成本分解及其控制思路:基于利益相關(guān)者的視角[J];特區(qū)經(jīng)濟;2010年02期

相關(guān)重要報紙文章 前1條

1 崔建遠;;論房屋拆遷制度的重建[N];人民法院報;2007年

相關(guān)博士學位論文 前1條

1 董經(jīng)緯;中國房地產(chǎn)市場價格“虛高”的制度經(jīng)濟學分析[D];吉林大學;2013年

相關(guān)碩士學位論文 前3條

1 郭晉升;我國重點城市房地產(chǎn)業(yè)集中度研究[D];西南財經(jīng)大學;2014年

2 潘凱;征地拆遷過程中的安置問題研究[D];西北農(nóng)林科技大學;2013年

3 肖守華;城市房屋拆遷補償問題研究[D];武漢大學;2005年

，

本文編號：1413060