本文選題：城鄉(xiāng)居民社會養(yǎng)老保險制度 + 公平性�。� 參考：《河南大學(xué)》2014年碩士論文

【摘要】：社會保障的作用是通過二次分配的調(diào)節(jié)盡可能地維護社會公平。公平是社會保障的核心理念。改革開放以來，我國養(yǎng)老保險制度在不斷地完善和發(fā)展，目前已經(jīng)實現(xiàn)了城鄉(xiāng)居民社會養(yǎng)老保險制度全覆蓋，推進基本公共服務(wù)均等化發(fā)展，朝著實現(xiàn)社會公平正義的目標(biāo)邁進了一大步，使我國原有的城鄉(xiāng)二元分割的社會保障制度不公平性問題得到初步解決。但是，城鄉(xiāng)居民社會養(yǎng)老保險公平問題不僅僅是城鄉(xiāng)統(tǒng)籌、制度統(tǒng)一就能完全解決的，城鄉(xiāng)居民社會養(yǎng)老保險與城鎮(zhèn)職工養(yǎng)老保險和機關(guān)事業(yè)單位退休養(yǎng)老制度之間的不公平性、代際的不公平性、城鄉(xiāng)居民生活水平、養(yǎng)老需求層次以及養(yǎng)老保障來源等方面的差異都是實現(xiàn)城鄉(xiāng)居民社會養(yǎng)老保險真正公平必須解決的問題。本文立足于這一社會背景，運用文獻研究、比較研究以及定性分析與定量分析相結(jié)合的研究方法，從公平性的基本內(nèi)涵、評價指標(biāo)和構(gòu)建原則入手，研究分析我國城鄉(xiāng)居民社會養(yǎng)老保險制度的公平性現(xiàn)狀，指出了這一制度還存在著外部不公平和內(nèi)部不公平以及其他方面的公平性不足問題，并有針對性地提出對策。 本文提出，城鄉(xiāng)居民社會養(yǎng)老保險制度是由政府部門組織，制定相應(yīng)的法律法規(guī)，符合條件的城鄉(xiāng)居民自愿參加，保障資金來源于政府補貼、社會統(tǒng)籌和個人繳費，，用于保護城市和農(nóng)村居民老年基本生活的一種制度安排。城鄉(xiāng)居民社會養(yǎng)老保險制度公平應(yīng)堅持城鄉(xiāng)并重原則、內(nèi)外兼顧原則和持續(xù)發(fā)展原則。本文從農(nóng)村社會養(yǎng)老保險制度、城鎮(zhèn)居民養(yǎng)老保險制度以及二者合并實施以后的新制度三個階段梳理了我國城鄉(xiāng)居民社會養(yǎng)老保險制度的發(fā)展歷程。分析了我國現(xiàn)行的城鄉(xiāng)居民社會養(yǎng)老保險制度的公平性狀況，認(rèn)為現(xiàn)行制度基本體現(xiàn)了城鄉(xiāng)居民參保機會公平、參保規(guī)則公平和參保結(jié)果公平。同時，本文也認(rèn)為，城鄉(xiāng)居民社會養(yǎng)老保險制度也存在著一定程度的公平性缺失現(xiàn)象，包括：制度外部不公平現(xiàn)象，體現(xiàn)在城鄉(xiāng)居民與城鎮(zhèn)職工（國家機關(guān)、事業(yè)單位和城鎮(zhèn)企業(yè)職工等就業(yè)人群）的社會養(yǎng)老保障水平差距大、城鄉(xiāng)居民與城鎮(zhèn)職工的社會養(yǎng)老資源分配不均等以及城鄉(xiāng)居民與城鎮(zhèn)職工（含機關(guān)事業(yè)單位人員）的收入水平差異大等方面。制度內(nèi)部不公平現(xiàn)象，體現(xiàn)在城鄉(xiāng)居民基本養(yǎng)老需求不一致、城鄉(xiāng)居民對制度公平的感受不一致以及城鄉(xiāng)居民養(yǎng)老金費用來源存在差異等方面，而現(xiàn)行制度設(shè)計并未考慮這些因素。此外，還有因收入分配逆向調(diào)節(jié)、保障水平偏低，居民逆向選擇等引發(fā)的不公平問題。 本文有針對性地提出了提升我國城鄉(xiāng)居民社會養(yǎng)老保險制度公平性的對策，主要有：樹立養(yǎng)老保險公平的理念、加大政府財政投入、增強制度激勵、漸進實現(xiàn)機關(guān)事業(yè)單位和城鎮(zhèn)職工與城鄉(xiāng)居保的制度整合、發(fā)展多層次的城鄉(xiāng)居民養(yǎng)老保險體系、注重城鄉(xiāng)居保制度可持續(xù)性。
[Abstract]:The role of social security is to maintain social equity as far as possible through the adjustment of the two distribution. Fairness is the core concept of social security. Since the reform and opening up, the old-age insurance system in China has been continuously perfected and developed. At present, the social endowment insurance system of urban and rural residents has been fully covered, and the equalization of basic public services has been promoted. In order to achieve the goal of realizing social justice and justice, the problem of the unfairness of the social security system in the two yuan division of urban and rural areas in our country has been preliminarily solved. However, the fairness of the social endowment insurance of urban and rural residents is not only the urban and rural overall planning, but the unity of the system can be completely solved, the urban and rural social endowment insurance and the town and town are all solved. The inequality between the old-age insurance and the retirement system of the institutions and institutions, the inequity of the intergenerational, the living standard of the urban and rural residents, the level of the demand for the aged and the source of the old-age security are all problems that must be solved to realize the real fairness of the social endowment insurance of urban and rural residents. With the research methods of literature research, comparative study and qualitative analysis and quantitative analysis, the equity status of the social endowment insurance system in urban and rural residents in China is studied and analyzed from the basic connotation of fairness, evaluation index and construction principle, and it is pointed out that there are external injustice, internal injustice and others. The problem of fairness is not enough, and countermeasures are put forward accordingly.
This paper puts forward that the social endowment insurance system of urban and rural residents is organized by the government departments, the corresponding laws and regulations, the voluntary participation of urban and rural residents in accordance with the conditions, the protection of funds from government subsidies, social co-ordination and personal contributions, for the protection of the basic life of the elderly in urban and rural residents, and the social support of urban and rural residents. The old insurance system should adhere to the principle of urban and rural equal importance, the principle of both internal and external and the principle of sustainable development. This article combs the development course of the social old-age insurance system of urban and rural residents in China from the rural social endowment insurance system, the pension insurance system for urban dwellers and the new system after the implementation of the two parties. The fairness of the social endowment insurance system of urban and rural residents, the present system basically embodies the fairness of the opportunities for urban and rural residents to participate in insurance, the fairness of the rules of participation and the fair result of the insurance. At the same time, this article also believes that the social endowment insurance system of urban and rural residents has a certain absence of fairness in a certain range, including the outside system. The fair phenomenon is reflected in the large gap between urban and rural residents and urban workers (state organs, institutions and employees in urban enterprises). The distribution of social endowment resources in urban and rural residents and urban workers is not equal, and the income levels of urban and rural residents and urban workers (including institutions and institutions) have great differences. The inconsistencies in the system are reflected in the inconsistencies in the basic needs of the urban and rural residents, the disagreement between the urban and rural residents on the institutional equity and the difference in the source of the pension costs of the urban and rural residents, while the current system design does not take these factors into consideration. Unfairness caused by adverse selection of residents.
This paper puts forward the countermeasures to improve the fairness of the social endowment insurance system of urban and rural residents in China. It is mainly as follows: establishing the concept of the equity of the endowment insurance, increasing the government financial input, strengthening the system incentive, gradually realizing the system integration of the institutions and urban workers and urban and rural residents, and developing the multi-level urban and rural residents' pension. The insurance system emphasizes the sustainability of the urban and rural housing security system.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：河南大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2014
【分類號】：F842.67

【參考文獻】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 徐強;;基本養(yǎng)老保險制度的公平性評價及影響因素[J];保險研究;2013年05期

2 肖艷;;公平與效率視角下的中國養(yǎng)老保險制度改革[J];經(jīng)濟體制改革;2008年05期

3 王艷萍;朱夙哲;;中國社會養(yǎng)老保險的公平性分析[J];金融教學(xué)與研究;2011年01期

4 李偉;;城鄉(xiāng)居民基本養(yǎng)老保險試點實證研究[J];開放導(dǎo)報;2011年05期

5 汪澤英,曾湘泉;完善基本養(yǎng)老保險制度 實現(xiàn)其公平的目標(biāo)[J];中國勞動;2004年10期

6 陸解芬,朱玉林;對提高養(yǎng)老保險基金統(tǒng)籌層次的探討[J];財會研究;2002年01期

7 高琳薇;;城鄉(xiāng)老年人生活需求滿足狀況及其對生活滿意度的影響——以貴陽市1518份問卷調(diào)查為例[J];南京人口管理干部學(xué)院學(xué)報;2012年04期

8 吳永求;冉光和;;農(nóng)村養(yǎng)老保險制度吸引力及公平性研究[J];經(jīng)濟與管理研究;2012年10期

9 曾娜;;老年安全與養(yǎng)老保險制度改革——以世代公平為中心[J];華北電力大學(xué)學(xué)報(社會科學(xué)版);2013年01期

10 周慶元;鄒麗陽;劉振平;;城鄉(xiāng)基本公共服務(wù)均等化:困境與出路[J];勞動保障世界(理論版);2013年10期

相關(guān)博士學(xué)位論文 前2條

1 劉軍偉;我國基本養(yǎng)老保險制度公平性研究[D];華中科技大學(xué);2012年

2 江華;中國社會保障經(jīng)濟公平的非均衡發(fā)展研究[D];首都經(jīng)濟貿(mào)易大學(xué);2013年

本文編號：2043218