我國(guó)保險(xiǎn)業(yè)發(fā)展對(duì)經(jīng)濟(jì)增長(zhǎng)影響的實(shí)證研究
本文選題:經(jīng)濟(jì)增長(zhǎng) + 非線性效用; 參考:《山東財(cái)經(jīng)大學(xué)》2014年碩士論文
【摘要】:關(guān)于保險(xiǎn)業(yè)與經(jīng)濟(jì)增長(zhǎng)關(guān)系的研究起源于上世紀(jì)70年代西方研究者們對(duì)金融業(yè)發(fā)展與經(jīng)濟(jì)增長(zhǎng)關(guān)系的研究。隨著保險(xiǎn)業(yè)的迅速發(fā)展,以及保險(xiǎn)業(yè)在經(jīng)濟(jì)發(fā)展中起到的巨大作用,研究者們開(kāi)始關(guān)注保險(xiǎn)業(yè)發(fā)展與經(jīng)濟(jì)增長(zhǎng)之間的關(guān)系。然而,研究者們對(duì)于保險(xiǎn)業(yè)與經(jīng)濟(jì)增長(zhǎng)關(guān)系的研究成果卻存在不同的結(jié)論。一種觀點(diǎn)認(rèn)為保險(xiǎn)業(yè)發(fā)展與經(jīng)濟(jì)增長(zhǎng)之間屬于“供給引導(dǎo)”型,即保險(xiǎn)發(fā)展促進(jìn)經(jīng)濟(jì)增長(zhǎng)。一種觀點(diǎn)認(rèn)為,它們之間屬于“需求跟隨”型,即經(jīng)濟(jì)的增長(zhǎng)導(dǎo)致對(duì)保險(xiǎn)服務(wù)的要求,促進(jìn)了保險(xiǎn)發(fā)展。分析這些研究,他們并沒(méi)有考慮不同經(jīng)濟(jì)發(fā)展水平這一重要因素,這是造成研究結(jié)論不同的重要原因。根據(jù)CarterDickinson(1992)等繪制的反映保險(xiǎn)業(yè)發(fā)展的路線,保險(xiǎn)深度與人均GDP之間應(yīng)該是一種“S”型曲線關(guān)系,這就意味著不同經(jīng)濟(jì)水平下保險(xiǎn)業(yè)發(fā)展跟經(jīng)濟(jì)增長(zhǎng)的關(guān)系是不同的,而大多數(shù)研究者們并沒(méi)有考慮該情形;另外,由于壽險(xiǎn)跟非壽險(xiǎn)的功能不同,它們對(duì)經(jīng)濟(jì)增長(zhǎng)的影響機(jī)制也不同。壽險(xiǎn)主要作為一種類似儲(chǔ)蓄的手段,更側(cè)重于資金融通功能來(lái)促進(jìn)經(jīng)濟(jì)增長(zhǎng),而非壽險(xiǎn)則更側(cè)重其風(fēng)險(xiǎn)轉(zhuǎn)移和經(jīng)濟(jì)補(bǔ)償功能來(lái)影響經(jīng)濟(jì)增長(zhǎng),很多研究者們也沒(méi)有考慮到這方面的不同。本文在前人研究的基礎(chǔ)上,首先對(duì)我國(guó)保險(xiǎn)業(yè)的發(fā)展?fàn)顩r做了簡(jiǎn)單介紹,包括我國(guó)保險(xiǎn)業(yè)發(fā)展歷程,保險(xiǎn)業(yè)規(guī)模,保險(xiǎn)業(yè)結(jié)構(gòu),并對(duì)保險(xiǎn)業(yè)發(fā)展的影響因素做了 分析;然后從保險(xiǎn)的風(fēng)險(xiǎn)轉(zhuǎn)移和經(jīng)濟(jì)補(bǔ)償功能,資金融通功能,社會(huì)管理功能三方面分別做了保險(xiǎn)業(yè)發(fā)展對(duì)經(jīng)濟(jì)增長(zhǎng)理論上的作用分析。接下來(lái),在Solow經(jīng)濟(jì)增長(zhǎng)模型的基礎(chǔ)上考慮保險(xiǎn)因素,并且加入影響經(jīng)濟(jì)增長(zhǎng)的其它關(guān)鍵變量建立新的經(jīng)濟(jì)增長(zhǎng)模型,利用中國(guó)30個(gè)省市近12年的面板數(shù)據(jù),,采用廣義矩估計(jì)方法從經(jīng)濟(jì)增長(zhǎng)水平和經(jīng)濟(jì)增長(zhǎng)速度兩方面考察了保險(xiǎn)業(yè)發(fā)展與經(jīng)濟(jì)增長(zhǎng)的關(guān)系。研究發(fā)現(xiàn):隨著經(jīng)濟(jì)水平的提高,保險(xiǎn)業(yè)對(duì)經(jīng)濟(jì)增長(zhǎng)的正向作用是越來(lái)越大的。如果分壽險(xiǎn)和非壽險(xiǎn)來(lái)看,情況有所不同。壽險(xiǎn)方面,無(wú)論是從經(jīng)濟(jì)增長(zhǎng)水平的角度還是經(jīng)濟(jì)增長(zhǎng)速度的角度,壽險(xiǎn)在經(jīng)濟(jì)水平中等的地區(qū)對(duì)經(jīng)濟(jì)增長(zhǎng)的正向作用最大。非壽險(xiǎn)方面,從經(jīng)濟(jì)增長(zhǎng)水平的角度來(lái)看,在經(jīng)濟(jì)水平低的地區(qū)對(duì)經(jīng)濟(jì)增長(zhǎng)的正向作用最大,而從經(jīng)濟(jì)增長(zhǎng)速度的角度來(lái)看,在經(jīng)濟(jì)水平高的地區(qū)正向作用最大,本文認(rèn)為出現(xiàn)這種差異是由于非壽險(xiǎn)相對(duì)于壽險(xiǎn)發(fā)展更為不平衡,對(duì)經(jīng)濟(jì)增長(zhǎng)的影響不穩(wěn)定所造成的。本文的實(shí)證結(jié)果還顯示,保險(xiǎn)業(yè)對(duì)經(jīng)濟(jì)增長(zhǎng)的滯后影響跟經(jīng)濟(jì)水平有關(guān)。壽險(xiǎn)跟非壽險(xiǎn)對(duì)經(jīng)濟(jì)增長(zhǎng)都具有滯后作用,雖然前期壽險(xiǎn)的對(duì)經(jīng)濟(jì)增長(zhǎng)的影響是負(fù)向的,前期非壽險(xiǎn)的作用是正向的,但隨著經(jīng)濟(jì)水平的提高,滯后作用都是在逐漸消失的。
[Abstract]:The research on the relationship between insurance industry and economic growth originates from the research on the relationship between the development of financial industry and economic growth by western researchers in the 1970s. With the rapid development of insurance industry and the great role of insurance industry in economic development, researchers begin to pay attention to the relationship between insurance industry development and economic growth. However, there are different conclusions about the relationship between insurance and economic growth. One view is that the development of insurance industry and economic growth belong to the "supply-oriented" type, that is, insurance development promotes economic growth. One view is that they belong to the "demand following" type, that is, economic growth leads to the demand for insurance services, and promotes the development of insurance. By analyzing these studies, they did not consider the important factor of different economic development level, which is the important reason for the different conclusions of the study. According to the route drawn by Carter Dickinson 1992 and others to reflect the development of the insurance industry, the relationship between insurance depth and per capita GDP should be a "S" curve, which means that the relationship between insurance development and economic growth is different at different economic levels. Most researchers do not consider the situation; moreover, because of the different functions of life insurance and non-life insurance, their impact on economic growth is also different. Life insurance, as a means similar to savings, focuses more on the function of financing to promote economic growth, while non-life insurance focuses on its risk transfer and economic compensation functions to influence economic growth. Many researchers have also failed to take this difference into account. On the basis of previous studies, this paper first makes a brief introduction to the development of the insurance industry in China, including the development course, scale and structure of the insurance industry, as well as the factors affecting the development of the insurance industry. Then the paper analyzes the function of insurance development on economic growth from three aspects: risk transfer and economic compensation function of insurance fund financing function and social management function. Next, the insurance factor is considered on the basis of the Solow economic growth model, and the new economic growth model is established by adding other key variables that affect the economic growth, using panel data from 30 provinces and cities in China for nearly 12 years. The relationship between the development of insurance industry and economic growth is investigated in terms of the level of economic growth and the speed of economic growth by using the method of generalized moment estimation. It is found that with the improvement of economic level, the positive effect of insurance industry on economic growth is increasing. If life insurance and non-life insurance, the situation is different. In terms of life insurance, whether from the angle of economic growth level or economic growth rate, life insurance has the greatest positive effect on economic growth in areas with medium economic level. In terms of non-life insurance, from the point of view of the level of economic growth, the positive effect on economic growth is the greatest in areas with low economic levels, while from the point of view of the speed of economic growth, it is the most positive in areas with high economic levels. This difference is due to the fact that non-life insurance is more unbalanced than life insurance and has unstable influence on economic growth. The empirical results also show that the lag effect of insurance industry on economic growth is related to economic level. Both life insurance and non-life insurance have lag effect on economic growth. Although the influence of early life insurance on economic growth is negative, the effect of pre-life insurance is positive, but with the improvement of economic level, the lag effect is gradually disappeared.
【學(xué)位授予單位】:山東財(cái)經(jīng)大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】:碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】:2014
【分類號(hào)】:F842;F124.1
【相似文獻(xiàn)】
中國(guó)期刊全文數(shù)據(jù)庫(kù) 前10條
1 薛進(jìn)軍;西方經(jīng)濟(jì)增長(zhǎng)理論的新思路[J];中國(guó)社會(huì)科學(xué)院研究生院學(xué)報(bào);1989年04期
2 龍劍;;再論質(zhì)量、技術(shù)進(jìn)步、經(jīng)濟(jì)增長(zhǎng)的相互關(guān)系[J];管理現(xiàn)代化;1992年05期
3 徐海根;;十年改革中的宏觀調(diào)控政策與經(jīng)濟(jì)增長(zhǎng)[J];江蘇社會(huì)科學(xué);1992年01期
4 蔡拓;增長(zhǎng)的誤區(qū)及其反思[J];天津師范大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);1993年03期
5 ;泰國(guó)經(jīng)濟(jì)增長(zhǎng)將依然強(qiáng)勁[J];廣西經(jīng)貿(mào);1994年12期
6 楊曉達(dá);經(jīng)濟(jì)增長(zhǎng)臺(tái)階論的內(nèi)涵與限量[J];黑龍江財(cái)專學(xué)報(bào);1994年04期
7 孫克忠,宋效中;科技進(jìn)步與經(jīng)濟(jì)增長(zhǎng)[J];遼寧大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(哲學(xué)社會(huì)科學(xué)版);1994年04期
8 楊云母 ,劉文廣;論對(duì)外貿(mào)易在經(jīng)濟(jì)增長(zhǎng)中的作用[J];吉林省經(jīng)濟(jì)管理干部學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);1994年02期
9 蔡玲;關(guān)于實(shí)現(xiàn)經(jīng)濟(jì)增長(zhǎng)方式轉(zhuǎn)變的戰(zhàn)略思考[J];現(xiàn)代商貿(mào)工業(yè);1995年11期
10 張宗斌;論經(jīng)濟(jì)增長(zhǎng)與通貨膨脹[J];商丘師范學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);1995年01期
中國(guó)重要會(huì)議論文全文數(shù)據(jù)庫(kù) 前10條
1 卓成霞;;金融危機(jī)下保就業(yè)與保經(jīng)濟(jì)增長(zhǎng)的博弈研究[A];建設(shè)經(jīng)濟(jì)文化強(qiáng)。禾魬(zhàn)·機(jī)遇·對(duì)策——山東省社會(huì)科學(xué)界2009年學(xué)術(shù)年會(huì)文集(2)[C];2009年
2 莫文;彭運(yùn)石;;主觀幸福感和經(jīng)濟(jì)增長(zhǎng)[A];第十一屆全國(guó)心理學(xué)學(xué)術(shù)會(huì)議論文摘要集[C];2007年
3 李鴻飛;于進(jìn)才;孟繁一;;試析中國(guó)經(jīng)濟(jì)增長(zhǎng)的環(huán)境成本[A];中華外國(guó)經(jīng)濟(jì)學(xué)說(shuō)研究會(huì)第十四次學(xué)術(shù)討論會(huì)論文摘要文集[C];2006年
4 姜焰生;;現(xiàn)代科技進(jìn)步與經(jīng)濟(jì)增長(zhǎng)研究[A];面向21世紀(jì)的科技進(jìn)步與社會(huì)經(jīng)濟(jì)發(fā)展(下冊(cè))[C];1999年
5 劉渝琳;白艷蘭;;金融深化影響城鄉(xiāng)居民收入差距的作用機(jī)制分析[A];第十一屆中國(guó)管理科學(xué)學(xué)術(shù)年會(huì)論文集[C];2009年
6 吳開(kāi);夏鑫;;技術(shù)創(chuàng)新對(duì)區(qū)域經(jīng)濟(jì)增長(zhǎng)的動(dòng)力機(jī)制[A];2010年(第十屆)中國(guó)制度經(jīng)濟(jì)學(xué)年會(huì)論文集[C];2010年
7 劉忠文;;經(jīng)濟(jì)增長(zhǎng)與人類的可持續(xù)發(fā)展淺析[A];科技、工程與經(jīng)濟(jì)社會(huì)協(xié)調(diào)發(fā)展——中國(guó)科協(xié)第五屆青年學(xué)術(shù)年會(huì)論文集[C];2004年
8 韓中豪;胡雄星;張明旭;;上海市經(jīng)濟(jì)增長(zhǎng)與環(huán)境污染水平的關(guān)系[A];中國(guó)環(huán)境科學(xué)學(xué)會(huì)2006年學(xué)術(shù)年會(huì)優(yōu)秀論文集(上卷)[C];2006年
9 劉幸菡;吳國(guó)蔚;;環(huán)境庫(kù)茲涅茨曲線及其在中國(guó)的實(shí)證檢驗(yàn)[A];中國(guó)環(huán)境科學(xué)學(xué)會(huì)2006年學(xué)術(shù)年會(huì)優(yōu)秀論文集(中卷)[C];2006年
10 王維國(guó);楊曉華;;我國(guó)國(guó)債與經(jīng)濟(jì)增長(zhǎng)關(guān)系的計(jì)量分析——兼論國(guó)債負(fù)擔(dān)對(duì)國(guó)債經(jīng)濟(jì)增長(zhǎng)效應(yīng)的影響[A];第八屆中國(guó)管理科學(xué)學(xué)術(shù)年會(huì)論文集[C];2006年
中國(guó)重要報(bào)紙全文數(shù)據(jù)庫(kù) 前10條
1 趙鳴驥;創(chuàng)新激發(fā)經(jīng)濟(jì)增長(zhǎng)[N];中國(guó)財(cái)經(jīng)報(bào);2002年
2 張曉靜,張開(kāi)飛;經(jīng)濟(jì)增長(zhǎng)能否承受稅收高速增長(zhǎng)之重[N];中國(guó)稅務(wù)報(bào);2005年
3 蔡f ;人力資本與經(jīng)濟(jì)增長(zhǎng)[N];湖北日?qǐng)?bào);2001年
4 陳 頤;教育是經(jīng)濟(jì)增長(zhǎng)關(guān)鍵因素[N];經(jīng)濟(jì)日?qǐng)?bào);2003年
5 李茹萍;工業(yè)產(chǎn)值突破千億珠海經(jīng)濟(jì)增長(zhǎng)提速[N];經(jīng)濟(jì)日?qǐng)?bào);2004年
6 本報(bào)記者 王比學(xué);7%,我們有信心![N];人民日?qǐng)?bào);2003年
7 本報(bào)記者 杜萍;經(jīng)濟(jì)增長(zhǎng)良好 降息大可不必[N];市場(chǎng)報(bào);2001年
8 余少謙;實(shí)現(xiàn)農(nóng)村和諧經(jīng)濟(jì)增長(zhǎng)[N];福建日?qǐng)?bào);2007年
9 見(jiàn)習(xí)記者 王白露;人行預(yù)計(jì):我省今年經(jīng)濟(jì)增長(zhǎng)10%以上[N];湖南經(jīng)濟(jì)報(bào);2007年
10 ;中國(guó)需要重新平衡經(jīng)濟(jì)增長(zhǎng)[N];機(jī)電商報(bào);2007年
中國(guó)博士學(xué)位論文全文數(shù)據(jù)庫(kù) 前10條
1 張琳;中國(guó)能源消費(fèi)與經(jīng)濟(jì)增長(zhǎng)關(guān)系的實(shí)證研究[D];西北大學(xué);2011年
2 程治中;論城市化與經(jīng)濟(jì)增長(zhǎng)[D];西南財(cái)經(jīng)大學(xué);2002年
3 關(guān)春華;印度對(duì)外貿(mào)易政策改革績(jī)效研究[D];遼寧大學(xué);2010年
4 黃菁;環(huán)境污染與經(jīng)濟(jì)可持續(xù)發(fā)展的關(guān)系及影響機(jī)制研究[D];湖南大學(xué);2010年
5 張寶貴;教育科學(xué)發(fā)展管理研究[D];天津大學(xué);2009年
6 陳萍;文化軟實(shí)力的經(jīng)濟(jì)學(xué)分析[D];吉林大學(xué);2010年
7 王然;市場(chǎng)化進(jìn)程、企業(yè)家職能配置與經(jīng)濟(jì)增長(zhǎng)[D];暨南大學(xué);2011年
8 曾祥炎;基于宏觀產(chǎn)權(quán)制度分析框架的中國(guó)經(jīng)濟(jì)增長(zhǎng)研究[D];遼寧大學(xué);2009年
9 劉暢;中國(guó)益貧式增長(zhǎng)中的經(jīng)濟(jì)政策研究[D];東北財(cái)經(jīng)大學(xué);2009年
10 方化雷;中國(guó)經(jīng)濟(jì)增長(zhǎng)與環(huán)境污染之間的關(guān)系[D];山東大學(xué);2011年
中國(guó)碩士學(xué)位論文全文數(shù)據(jù)庫(kù) 前10條
1 劉波;基于對(duì)經(jīng)濟(jì)增長(zhǎng)影響的我國(guó)社會(huì)保障制度健全研究[D];重慶理工大學(xué);2010年
2 于曉黎;青島市經(jīng)濟(jì)增長(zhǎng)與環(huán)境污染關(guān)系研究[D];中國(guó)海洋大學(xué);2010年
3 李田田;標(biāo)準(zhǔn)對(duì)湖南省經(jīng)濟(jì)增長(zhǎng)影響的實(shí)證研究[D];湖南大學(xué);2009年
4 洪韜;制度因素對(duì)經(jīng)濟(jì)增長(zhǎng)影響的國(guó)際比較研究[D];東華大學(xué);2010年
5 候志德;文化產(chǎn)業(yè)發(fā)展對(duì)經(jīng)濟(jì)增長(zhǎng)影響的實(shí)證研究[D];東北財(cái)經(jīng)大學(xué);2010年
6 韓長(zhǎng)春;區(qū)域金融發(fā)展與經(jīng)濟(jì)增長(zhǎng)關(guān)系[D];天津財(cái)經(jīng)大學(xué);2010年
7 丁昌昆;財(cái)政政策與經(jīng)濟(jì)增長(zhǎng)研究[D];西南財(cái)經(jīng)大學(xué);2010年
8 張亞軍;天津市環(huán)境質(zhì)量與經(jīng)濟(jì)增長(zhǎng)關(guān)系的實(shí)證分析[D];天津大學(xué);2010年
9 郭剛軍;遼寧高新技術(shù)產(chǎn)業(yè)對(duì)經(jīng)濟(jì)增長(zhǎng)貢獻(xiàn)的研究[D];東北大學(xué);2007年
10 魯濤;國(guó)有銀行發(fā)展與經(jīng)濟(jì)增長(zhǎng)的實(shí)證研究[D];南京財(cái)經(jīng)大學(xué);2010年
本文編號(hào):1978411
本文鏈接:http://sikaile.net/jingjilunwen/bxjjlw/1978411.html