拉薩市農(nóng)村小學(xué)教師流動問題研究
[Abstract]:The main purpose of this paper is to analyze the flow of rural primary school teachers in Lhasa, Tibet. The significance of this study lies in: the rural primary schools in Lhasa, with the support of the national policy, have implemented the three-package policy in rural and pastoral primary schools, and almost all the teachers' qualifications in the rural primary schools in Lhasa have been able to meet the teaching requirements of rural primary schools. However, there are still some problems. For example, the students' achievements are still not high, the teaching environment needs to be improved, the teacher wastage and so on. Some problems can be understood, but some problems are very confusing. For example, teachers' academic qualifications are already very high. Why is it still worrying about the students' academic achievement and the improvement of the transition rate? This is caused by the unique teaching environment in Tibet. The quality of education in Tibet's agricultural and pastoral areas is influenced by the natural environment, the climate conditions on the plateau, the educational concepts caused by the living habits of farmers and herdsmen, and so on. Therefore, the problem of teacher mobility in rural primary schools in Lhasa can not be achieved overnight, it is a complex problem affected by various factors. Therefore, the research significance of this paper mainly includes the following aspects: first, the basic education of rural primary schools is in an important position in the whole compulsory education stage, and the teachers of rural primary schools in Lhasa play a decisive role in the results of rural primary education; Second, the characteristics of teachers' mobility can make teachers' satisfaction, and have an important impact on the enthusiasm of the work. Third, the rural primary schools in Lhasa city include rural areas, pastoral areas, and schools of agri-pastoral integration. The contents of the research are very rich. The conclusions can be used for reference in other parts of the study area. In order to make the research in this paper more practical and more true to reflect the existing problems, the following research methods are adopted. First, interview, that is, through dialogue to find out the truth of some of the problems. Second, observation means observing the school's hardware facilities, teachers' and students' behavior around the school to judge the school's teaching environment. Third, the literature method, that is, through the knowledge network to check the periodicals, degree papers to understand the latest research results of basic education in Tibet, through the reading of books to master the classical discussion of this field. Fourth, questionnaire method, that is, through the data to be investigated into a table or a simple questionnaire to collect data. At present, the research on teacher mobility in rural primary schools is mainly based on psychology, behavior, economics, ecology and so on. In the scope of the research object, the case study is gradually carried out from the whole region to several schools or even one school in a certain area, which makes the society have a deeper understanding of the problem of the flow of teachers in rural primary schools. However, among a large number of articles on teacher mobility in rural primary schools, there are only a few articles devoted to the flow of rural primary school teachers in ethnic minority areas. There are few articles on the study of teacher mobility in rural primary schools in Tibet, and there are few in-depth and detailed studies on them. Due to the unique plateau environment in Tibet, the author thinks that the conclusion of rural primary school teacher mobility in Tibet cannot be copied from the mainland's conclusion on the flow of rural primary school teachers by looking up relevant documents and personal experience. It is necessary to combine the natural environment of Tibet and the cultural life of farmers and herdsmen and so on. This paper puts forward its own opinion by studying the situation of four primary schools in rural and pastoral areas and combining with the overall situation of Tibet.
【學(xué)位授予單位】:西藏大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】:碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】:2016
【分類號】:G625.1
【相似文獻】
相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條
1 李廣裕;農(nóng)村小學(xué)教師待遇問題調(diào)查[J];第一師范學(xué)報;2000年S1期
2 蔡協(xié)慶,常玉英;對拖欠農(nóng)村小學(xué)教師工資問題的思考[J];江蘇統(tǒng)計;2001年02期
3 賈松林;淺談農(nóng)村小學(xué)教師職業(yè)道德建設(shè)[J];四川教育學(xué)院學(xué)報;2001年08期
4 翁賢浩;農(nóng)村小學(xué)教師“無為”管理的特征及方法[J];當(dāng)代教育科學(xué);2003年08期
5 張玉林;農(nóng)村小學(xué)教師備課情況的調(diào)查與思考[J];教學(xué)與管理;2004年32期
6 關(guān)黌諺;;關(guān)于農(nóng)村小學(xué)教師培訓(xùn)的思考[J];中小學(xué)教師培訓(xùn);2005年05期
7 張文興 ,張良元;對農(nóng)村小學(xué)教師“寫備”現(xiàn)象的反思[J];教學(xué)與管理;2005年14期
8 鄒小琦;;農(nóng)村小學(xué)教師校本教研之現(xiàn)狀及對策[J];科學(xué)咨詢(教育科研);2006年01期
9 張銳;韓玲;;板塊構(gòu)建:常態(tài)下農(nóng)村小學(xué)教師成長的基本途徑[J];教學(xué)與管理;2008年11期
10 段軍;呂大洪;;農(nóng)村小學(xué)教師壓力過重的成因與對策——以蘇北某縣為例[J];基礎(chǔ)教育研究;2009年21期
相關(guān)會議論文 前10條
1 王淑梅;周武忠;;農(nóng)村小學(xué)教師工作量定標(biāo)[A];國家教師科研基金“十一五”成果集(中國名校卷)(一)[C];2009年
2 王淑梅;周武忠;;農(nóng)村小學(xué)教師工作量定標(biāo)[A];國家教師科研基金十一五階段性成果集(內(nèi)蒙古卷)[C];2010年
3 韓志方;宋愛東;;農(nóng)村小學(xué)教師基本素質(zhì)的調(diào)查與思考[A];跨世紀園丁工程論叢[C];2000年
4 韓美榮;;濱州市農(nóng)村小學(xué)教師心理素質(zhì)調(diào)查研究[A];山東省師范教育學(xué)會2002年度師范教育研究優(yōu)秀成果論文集[C];2002年
5 汪建芬;;農(nóng)村小學(xué)教師壓力源及應(yīng)對策略的研究[A];2011年浙江省心理衛(wèi)生協(xié)會第九屆學(xué)術(shù)年會論文匯編[C];2011年
6 謝寶祥;;基于網(wǎng)絡(luò)的農(nóng)村小學(xué)教師校本培訓(xùn)研究[A];中國當(dāng)代教育理論文獻——第四屆中國教育家大會成果匯編(上)[C];2007年
7 陳秀珍;;農(nóng)村小學(xué)教師課堂教學(xué)設(shè)計能力影響因素分析及對策[A];山東省師范教育學(xué)會2002年度師范教育研究優(yōu)秀成果論文集[C];2002年
8 ;2009年農(nóng)村小學(xué)教師省級培訓(xùn)工作匯報[A];河北省教育廳2009年繼續(xù)教育工作會議暨河北省教師教育學(xué)會2009年年會交流材料匯編[C];2009年
9 毛春;;農(nóng)村小學(xué)教師多媒體教學(xué)資源使用意向研究[A];2011年全國電子信息技術(shù)與應(yīng)用學(xué)術(shù)會議論文集[C];2011年
10 李英杰;;東營地區(qū)農(nóng)村小學(xué)教師教學(xué)技能現(xiàn)狀調(diào)查[A];山東省師范教育學(xué)會2002年度師范教育研究優(yōu)秀成果論文集[C];2002年
相關(guān)重要報紙文章 前10條
1 湖北省鄖縣譚山鎮(zhèn)中心學(xué)校 李長明;莫讓論文成村小教師心病[N];中國教育報;2008年
2 張曉晶;山東:農(nóng)村小學(xué)“爺爺奶奶”教師比較多[N];新華每日電訊;2008年
3 記者 陳薇;我市核增955名農(nóng)村小學(xué)教師編制[N];閩東日報;2009年
4 安徽省滁州市南譙區(qū)政協(xié) 徐漢松 華西欣;解決農(nóng)村小學(xué)教師老齡化問題已成當(dāng)務(wù)之急[N];人民政協(xié)報;2011年
5 本報記者 于洪全;農(nóng)村小學(xué)教師能否實行派出制[N];大連日報;2005年
6 ,F(xiàn)勇 茜秀臣 封新河;魏縣為農(nóng)村小學(xué)教師“補課”[N];河北日報;2005年
7 祝國榮邋楊利文 本報記者 胡濤;“三定向”培養(yǎng)農(nóng)村小學(xué)教師[N];撫州日報;2007年
8 林必茂 本報記者 余志華 陳韌;農(nóng)村小學(xué)“師荒”癥結(jié)何在[N];撫州日報;2007年
9 記者 李文軍 通訊員 徐曉光 井光進;濰坊3年引進1650名新教師[N];中國教育報;2009年
10 燕景海;湯陰縣 公開招聘60名農(nóng)村小學(xué)教師[N];安陽日報;2010年
相關(guān)博士學(xué)位論文 前1條
1 趙金坡;聲音與回響:我國農(nóng)村中師畢業(yè)生的歷史考察(1979-2009)[D];華東師范大學(xué);2011年
相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前10條
1 許小平;農(nóng)村小學(xué)教師身份認同研究[D];西南大學(xué);2010年
2 陳曉微;農(nóng)村小學(xué)教師“老齡”問題研究[D];東北師范大學(xué);2010年
3 銀婷;四川藏、漢地區(qū)農(nóng)村小學(xué)教師“幸福感”研究[D];四川師范大學(xué);2010年
4 張道祥;農(nóng)村小學(xué)教師生存狀況與對策研究[D];山東師范大學(xué);2008年
5 張維君;農(nóng)村小學(xué)教師與家長的交往[D];西北師范大學(xué);2011年
6 喬妍;專業(yè)化背景下農(nóng)村小學(xué)教師自主學(xué)習(xí)研究[D];南京師范大學(xué);2011年
7 郭蘇俏;新中國60年四川農(nóng)村小學(xué)教師經(jīng)濟收入變化研究[D];四川師范大學(xué);2011年
8 王燦燦;新疆邊遠地區(qū)農(nóng)村小學(xué)教師收入狀況調(diào)查研究[D];四川師范大學(xué);2011年
9 夏蘭輝;農(nóng)村小學(xué)教師擇業(yè)動機研究[D];湖南大學(xué);2012年
10 劉新;農(nóng)村小學(xué)教師閱讀現(xiàn)狀的調(diào)查研究[D];山東師范大學(xué);2013年
,本文編號:2247940
本文鏈接:http://sikaile.net/jiaoyulunwen/xiaoxuejiaoyu/2247940.html