【摘要】：民族教育一直處在國家意識形態(tài)、地方(民族)意識形態(tài)和個體精英意識形態(tài)的交織與博弈之中,在競爭、磋商和認同中規(guī)定了民族教育的目標、宗旨、內容和國家統(tǒng)一的指導原則、綱要,并在制度化中進一步完善起來,在法律上給予了承認和保障。意識三態(tài)觀作為一種理論視野、一種行動視野和一種范式,不僅僅應用在民族教育研究方面,還可應用在民族理論和民族關系的實踐方面。它本身不是一個大理論,卻為建立大理論提供視野;它也不是一個微理論,但能為建立微理論提供思考和操作;它是一個中型理論的范式,可以將宏大理論與微理論、理論研究與經(jīng)驗研究結合起來。
[Abstract]:National education has always been in the intertwined and game of national ideology, local (national) ideology and individual elite ideology, in the competition, consultation and identification set out the goals and purposes of ethnic education. The content and the national unified guiding principle, outline, and further perfect in the institutionalization, has given the recognition and the safeguard in the law. As a theoretical field of vision, a vision of action and a paradigm, the three-state view of consciousness can be applied not only to the research of ethnic education, but also to the practice of national theory and national relations. It is not a big theory itself, but it provides a field of vision for the establishment of a large theory, nor is it a micro-theory, but it can provide thinking and operation for the establishment of a micro-theory; It is a paradigm of medium-sized theory, which can combine grand theory with micro-theory, theoretical research with empirical research.
【作者單位】： 北京大學社會學系;
【基金】：教育部人文社會科學重點研究基地重大課題(項目編號:11JJD840013)
【分類號】：G750

【參考文獻】

相關期刊論文 前8條

1 錢民輝;;略論多元文化教育的理念與實踐[J];北京大學學報(哲學社會科學版);2011年03期

2 宇曉;瑤族的漢式姓氏和字輩制度──瑤漢文化涵化的一個橫斷面[J];貴州民族研究;1995年04期

3 錢民輝;沈洪成;;從意識三態(tài)觀重新審視現(xiàn)代性與民族教育之關系[J];廣西民族大學學報(哲學社會科學版);2012年04期

4 黃現(xiàn)t，

本文編號：2439297