本文關(guān)鍵詞： 大學(xué) 想象 文學(xué)敘事　出處：《華東師范大學(xué)》2012年碩士論文　論文類型：學(xué)位論文

【摘要】：目前關(guān)于大學(xué)的研究大多聚焦于大學(xué)的制度、結(jié)構(gòu)、理念、歷史或者師生群體,不論整體或者個(gè)案,也大多基于一個(gè)具體問(wèn)題展開(kāi)研究。與之不同,筆者試圖借助小說(shuō)對(duì)大學(xué)的“想象”,文學(xué)敘事對(duì)特定時(shí)代的群體或個(gè)體日常生活的“刻畫”,來(lái)解讀大學(xué)自身在制度、文化層面呈現(xiàn)出來(lái)的特征。由于小說(shuō)更多地著眼于作為社會(huì)主體的人或群體的日常生活、人際關(guān)系、文化習(xí)俗,因此借助小說(shuō)來(lái)解讀大學(xué),既有再現(xiàn)其作為一種社會(huì)存在的結(jié)構(gòu)意義,也有著解構(gòu)的價(jià)值。尤其是近年來(lái)試圖在現(xiàn)實(shí)與虛構(gòu)之間建立一種內(nèi)在關(guān)聯(lián)的文學(xué)“想象”,實(shí)際上在肯定創(chuàng)作者在小說(shuō)中糅合個(gè)體經(jīng)驗(yàn)、普遍社會(huì)意識(shí)和批評(píng)現(xiàn)實(shí)的諸多取向的基礎(chǔ)上,將文學(xué)本身視為一種社會(huì)建構(gòu)的言語(yǔ)行為方式。也就是說(shuō),小說(shuō)所敘述的大學(xué)想象造就了某種意識(shí)形態(tài)與話語(yǔ)權(quán)威。關(guān)于“想象”,筆者在第二章對(duì)其內(nèi)涵及歷史發(fā)展脈絡(luò)進(jìn)行了梳理,同時(shí)也分析了文學(xué)想象介入大學(xué)研究的意義及方式,以及中外大學(xué)發(fā)展歷史對(duì)大學(xué)想象的塑形。 從論述邏輯上看,文學(xué)敘事通過(guò)“大學(xué)想象”與大學(xué)現(xiàn)實(shí)狀況建立關(guān)系,小說(shuō)文本描述大學(xué)故事,大學(xué)故事體現(xiàn)制度環(huán)境,制度環(huán)境規(guī)約意識(shí)形態(tài),意識(shí)形態(tài)轉(zhuǎn)為生活方式。也正是在這一越界與循環(huán)中,大學(xué)想象生成、毀滅與重塑。本文即是在此邏輯中,采用文獻(xiàn)分析的研究方法,探討文學(xué)敘事中大學(xué)想象如何投射著一個(gè)時(shí)代的思想變遷,滋潤(rùn)著當(dāng)代大學(xué)生的校園生活,引領(lǐng)或制約著大學(xué)未來(lái)的發(fā)展方向,從而對(duì)高等教育進(jìn)行宏觀研究分析。 從論述主題上看,筆者圍繞“想象”將之分為大學(xué)、大學(xué)教師和大學(xué)生三部分,分別體現(xiàn)在第三、四、五章。第三章,分析了在學(xué)術(shù)資本主義影響下,大學(xué)如何開(kāi)始創(chuàng)業(yè),并與學(xué)術(shù)行政化聯(lián)姻,共同導(dǎo)致大學(xué)的傳統(tǒng)想象在講堂、出版物和大眾媒體中瓦解與重建。第四章,通過(guò)教授的文學(xué)形象與精英想象的對(duì)比,體現(xiàn)了大學(xué)教師與傳統(tǒng)知識(shí)分子想象的疏離。尤其關(guān)注了“職稱”對(duì)大學(xué)教師價(jià)值信仰的影響,以及去精英化給其帶來(lái)的身份危機(jī)。第五章,借助大學(xué)文化共同體,從現(xiàn)代性以及后現(xiàn)代文化中分析了大學(xué)生敘事的世俗化過(guò)程。 也就是說(shuō),本論文研究的問(wèn)題不是一個(gè)具體的教育現(xiàn)象或教育問(wèn)題,而是在意識(shí)形態(tài)層面上,分析小說(shuō)對(duì)大學(xué)的敘述,如何反映并塑造著我們自身對(duì)大學(xué)的認(rèn)知與觀念。這一過(guò)程是在現(xiàn)代性語(yǔ)境中完成的,現(xiàn)代性的運(yùn)行機(jī)制也就限制了不止是作家、更是社會(huì)集體,對(duì)大學(xué)想象的方式和程度。大學(xué)一旦進(jìn)入想象視域,其實(shí)在性與虛構(gòu)性就被統(tǒng)一起來(lái),由此“大學(xué)想象”成為一個(gè)中介,一個(gè)載體,一個(gè)途徑,通過(guò)這一中介、載體和途徑來(lái)思考中國(guó)大學(xué)的命運(yùn)與前景。
[Abstract]:At present, most of the studies on universities focus on the institutions, structures, ideas, history or groups of teachers and students, whether as a whole or in individual cases, and most of them are based on a specific problem. The author tries to interpret the institution of the university by the "imagination" of the novel and the "depiction" of the daily life of the group or individual in a specific era by the literary narration. Since the novels focus more on the daily life, interpersonal relationships and cultural customs of the people or groups as the main body of society, they use the novel to interpret the university. Having the structural significance of reproducing its social existence, In particular, the attempt in recent years to establish an inherent link between reality and fiction in literary "imagination" is in fact affirming that the creators combine individual experiences in their novels. On the basis of the general social consciousness and the tendency of criticizing reality, literature itself is regarded as a kind of speech act of social construction. The university imagination described in the novel has created a certain ideology and discourse authority. In the second chapter, the author combs its connotation and historical development, and also analyzes the significance and mode of literary imagination in university research. And the history of the development of Chinese and foreign universities to shape the imagination of the university. From the view of argumentation logic, the literary narration establishes the relationship with the university reality through "university imagination", the novel text describes the university story, the university story embodies the system environment, the system environment regulation ideology. It is in this crossing and cycle that the university imagination is generated, destroyed and remolded. This paper, in this logic, adopts the research method of literature analysis. This paper discusses how the university imagination in literary narration projects the ideological changes of an era, moistens the campus life of the contemporary college students, leads or restricts the future development direction of the university, and thus carries on the macroscopic research analysis to the higher education. From the point of view of the theme, the author divides the "imagination" into three parts: universities, university teachers and college students, which are embodied in the third, fourth and fifth chapters respectively. The third chapter analyzes how the university begins to start a business under the influence of academic capitalism. And combined with academic administration, leading to the collapse and reconstruction of the traditional imagination of the university in the lecture hall, publications and mass media. 4th chapters, through the comparison of the literary image of the professor and the imagination of the elite, It reflects the alienation of university teachers from the traditional intellectuals. It pays special attention to the influence of "professional title" on the value belief of university teachers and the identity crisis brought to them by deeliction. Chapter 5th, with the help of the cultural community of the university, pays special attention to the influence of "professional title" on the value belief of university teachers. This paper analyzes the secularization process of college students' narration from modernity and post-modern culture. That is to say, the problem studied in this thesis is not a specific educational phenomenon or educational problem, but an ideological analysis of the narration of the university in the novel. How to reflect and shape our own cognition and concept of university is completed in the context of modernity, and the operating mechanism of modernity restricts not only writers, but also social collectives. The way and degree of university imagination. Once the university enters the horizon of imagination, in fact, the sex and the fictitious nature are unified. Thus, "university imagination" becomes an intermediary, a carrier, a way, through this intermediary. Carriers and ways to think about the fate and prospects of Chinese universities.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：華東師范大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2012
【分類號(hào)】：G640

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 陳平原;;文學(xué)史視野中的“大學(xué)敘事”[J];北京大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(哲學(xué)社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2006年02期

2 閻光才;;教師“身份”的制度與文化根源及當(dāng)下危機(jī)[J];北京師范大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2006年04期

3 劉震;文學(xué)史:作為想象的話語(yǔ)實(shí)踐——對(duì)一種思路的清理[J];楚雄師范學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2003年05期

4 王德威;許子?xùn)|;陳平原;;想象中國(guó)的方法——以小說(shuō)史研究為中心[J];當(dāng)代作家評(píng)論;2007年03期

5 ;認(rèn)識(shí)、游戲與想象——對(duì)文學(xué)功利性問(wèn)題的思考[J];電子科技大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(社科版);2003年04期

6 劉小新;大同詩(shī)學(xué)想象與地方知識(shí)的建構(gòu)——華文文學(xué)研究的兩種路徑及其整合[J];東南學(xué)術(shù);2004年03期

7 許聯(lián);樊平軍;;大學(xué)教師身份考察與大學(xué)文化的復(fù)興[J];國(guó)家教育行政學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2009年10期

8 南翔;;三年樹(shù)人[J];北京文學(xué);2003年09期

9 周宗誠(chéng);大學(xué)教師社會(huì)角色論[J];高等教育研究;2001年05期

10 葉芬梅;;高校教師職稱制度功能探討:一個(gè)制度分析的視角[J];黑龍江高教研究;2009年09期

相關(guān)博士學(xué)位論文 前2條

1 劉子貴;論“兩種文化”矛盾與人文精神的構(gòu)建[D];吉林大學(xué);2006年

2 季劍青;大學(xué)視野中的新文學(xué)[D];北京大學(xué);2007年

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前4條

1 孫福兵;高校教師職稱制度研究[D];山東師范大學(xué);2008年

2 周晨;轉(zhuǎn)型期中國(guó)小說(shuō)大學(xué)敘事研究[D];山東師范大學(xué);2008年

3 單丙波;試論改革開(kāi)放以來(lái)中國(guó)高校教師職稱制度之變遷[D];山東大學(xué);2008年

4 許偉華;教育小說(shuō)視野中的西南聯(lián)大校園文化[D];云南大學(xué);2010年

，

本文編號(hào)：1554201