【摘要】：隨著高等教育發(fā)展加快和戰(zhàn)略地位的上升,其面臨的緊迫任務(wù),是在制度、層次和范圍上建立、完善高等教育質(zhì)量保障體系。當(dāng)高等教育規(guī)模擴(kuò)張到一定程度、高校辦學(xué)條件達(dá)到一定水平、教育成果的基本質(zhì)量標(biāo)準(zhǔn)初步建立之后,完善質(zhì)量保障體系、做到內(nèi)外兼修就成為高等教育進(jìn)一步發(fā)展的必由之路。本文借鑒平衡計(jì)分卡的理念和方法深入研究高等教育質(zhì)量管理的內(nèi)涵,從關(guān)注辦學(xué)條件逐步轉(zhuǎn)變到關(guān)注質(zhì)量生成過程和高校辦學(xué)的流程,從引導(dǎo)高校開展教育教學(xué)基本建設(shè)轉(zhuǎn)變到指導(dǎo)高校進(jìn)行評估指標(biāo)改進(jìn)與教育教學(xué)改革,培養(yǎng)自主保障而非被動參與的質(zhì)量文化,建立健全高等教育質(zhì)量保障體系,從而保障教育質(zhì)量的穩(wěn)步提升。 通過界定和分析大眾化高等教育質(zhì)量保障體系基本理論問題、發(fā)展現(xiàn)狀和趨勢,解析教育質(zhì)量保障體系在高等教育發(fā)展中的重要性,概覽發(fā)達(dá)國家高等教育質(zhì)量保障體系的研究歷程,從中歸納出對我國高等教育質(zhì)量保障體系的宏觀啟示,對平衡計(jì)分卡應(yīng)用于高等教育質(zhì)量保障體系做適用性及優(yōu)越性分析并列出具體操作范式,通過界定高等院校的使命和發(fā)展戰(zhàn)略,采用平衡計(jì)分卡及對應(yīng)的戰(zhàn)略地圖等工具構(gòu)建通用的戰(zhàn)略管理框架,建立高等學(xué)校的戰(zhàn)略宏圖與具體的管理目標(biāo)及執(zhí)行指標(biāo)之間的映射,引導(dǎo)高等學(xué)校建立一套科學(xué)化、可復(fù)制的質(zhì)量保障體系。 綜上,本文的研究不僅從微觀層面上為高等教育質(zhì)量目標(biāo)的達(dá)成提供有力的體系保障,同時(shí)也在宏觀層面上為《國家中長期教育改革和發(fā)展規(guī)劃綱要》在高等學(xué)校的落地與貫徹提供了可借鑒的思路。
[Abstract]:With the acceleration of the development of higher education and the rise of its strategic position, its urgent task is to establish and perfect the quality assurance system of higher education on the system, level and scope. When the scale of higher education has expanded to a certain extent, the conditions for running a university have reached a certain level, and the basic quality standards of educational achievements have been preliminarily established, the quality assurance system will be improved. It is the only way for the further development of higher education to do both internal and external training. Based on the idea and method of balanced Scorecard, this paper deeply studies the connotation of higher education quality management, and gradually changes from paying attention to the condition of running a school to paying attention to the process of quality generation and the process of running a university. From guiding colleges and universities to carrying out education and teaching infrastructure to guiding colleges and universities to improve evaluation indexes and education and teaching reform, to cultivate a quality culture of independent protection rather than passive participation, and to establish and improve the quality assurance system of higher education. Thus ensuring the steady improvement of the quality of education. By defining and analyzing the basic theoretical problems, current situation and trend of mass higher education quality assurance system, this paper analyzes the importance of education quality assurance system in the development of higher education. An overview of the research process of the quality assurance system of higher education in developed countries, from which the macroscopic enlightenment to the quality assurance system of higher education in China is summed up. This paper analyzes the applicability and superiority of the balanced Scorecard in the quality assurance system of higher education, and lists the concrete operation paradigm, and defines the mission and development strategy of the colleges and universities. By using the balanced scorecard and corresponding strategic map, the general strategic management framework is constructed, the mapping between the strategic grand plan of the university and the concrete management goal and the execution index is established, and the scientific set of the university is guided. Replicable quality assurance system. In summary, the research of this paper not only provides a strong system guarantee for the achievement of the quality goal of higher education from the micro level, At the same time, at the macro level, it also provides some useful ideas for the landing and implementation of the National Medium-and Long-Term Education Reform and Development Program in higher education institutions.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：湖北大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2013
【分類號】：G649.2

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 陳寧;;論高等教育質(zhì)量保障體系建設(shè)的框架設(shè)計(jì)[J];西華師范大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(哲學(xué)社會科學(xué)版);2009年06期

2 胡建波;;平衡計(jì)分卡在高校戰(zhàn)略管理中的應(yīng)用[J];高等工程教育研究;2008年05期

3 楊彩霞;;高校內(nèi)部教學(xué)質(zhì)量保障體系評析——教育部評估中心教學(xué)質(zhì)量保障體系研討會啟示[J];中國高等教育評估;2009年04期

4 康宏;高等教育質(zhì)量保障機(jī)制研究[J];國家高級教育行政學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2001年05期

5 高海生;沈紅;;基于自我評估的高校教學(xué)質(zhì)量內(nèi)部保證體系的理論構(gòu)建[J];國家教育行政學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2011年02期

6 冷余生;;從質(zhì)量爭議看高等教育質(zhì)量評價(jià)的現(xiàn)狀和任務(wù)[J];高等教育研究;2007年03期

7 羅建國;;我國高等教育政府評估的困境與對策分析[J];高等教育研究;2007年03期

8 潘懋元;肖海濤;;中國高等教育大眾化結(jié)構(gòu)與體系變革[J];高等教育研究;2008年05期

9 席成孝;黃新民;;地方高校構(gòu)建內(nèi)部教學(xué)質(zhì)量保障體系的主要障礙及其對策[J];陜西理工學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào)(社會科學(xué)版);2010年03期

10 張欣;蔡國春;;院校研究——高等教育質(zhì)量保障的新視角[J];江蘇高教;2010年04期

，

本文編號：2392752