本文選題：工科大學(xué)物理 + 比較研究�。� 參考：《合肥工業(yè)大學(xué)》2013年碩士論文

【摘要】：在2010年6月國家教育部啟動了“卓越工程師教育培養(yǎng)計(jì)劃”的背景下，各個高校都在探索“卓越工程師”的培養(yǎng)方案和方式，各個學(xué)科也努力改革自己的教學(xué)模式與教學(xué)內(nèi)容為培養(yǎng)優(yōu)秀工程人才的目的服務(wù)。大學(xué)物理作為工科各專業(yè)必修的基礎(chǔ)課程，教學(xué)模式與教學(xué)內(nèi)容如何更加符合工科專業(yè)的特色，如何更好的培養(yǎng)工科專業(yè)學(xué)生的能力與素質(zhì)，如何更好的促進(jìn)工科學(xué)生的成長是大學(xué)物理教學(xué)所要積極面對和思考的問題。 論文在“卓越工程師教育培養(yǎng)計(jì)劃”背景下，系統(tǒng)分析和比較針對本科階段的工程師學(xué)歷教育互認(rèn)組織《華盛頓協(xié)議》簽約國與我國工科大學(xué)物理的教學(xué)情況，從教學(xué)內(nèi)容、課程設(shè)置、教材建設(shè)等方面分析了各自的特點(diǎn)。將《華盛頓協(xié)議》簽約國知名教材教學(xué)內(nèi)容，教材編排，習(xí)題等與我國國家教育部高等學(xué)校物理基礎(chǔ)課程教學(xué)指導(dǎo)分委會頒布的《理工科類大學(xué)物理課程教學(xué)基本要求》和國內(nèi)知名大學(xué)物理教材的教學(xué)內(nèi)容相比較，將國內(nèi)高校工科大學(xué)物理課程設(shè)置與《華盛頓協(xié)議》簽約國高校大學(xué)物理課程設(shè)置相比較，分析了《華盛頓協(xié)議》簽約國與我國的工科大學(xué)物理在教學(xué)內(nèi)容、課程設(shè)置、教材建設(shè)方面的差異，并結(jié)合國內(nèi)工科大學(xué)物理教學(xué)對象的基礎(chǔ)和國內(nèi)工科教育的實(shí)際情況總結(jié)了對比研究對我國工科大學(xué)物理教學(xué)改革的啟示。論文指出我國工科大學(xué)物理教學(xué)在教學(xué)內(nèi)容、課程設(shè)置和教材建設(shè)中在保留優(yōu)勢基礎(chǔ)上,要注重創(chuàng)新能力的培養(yǎng)和解決問題的能力的提高，要體現(xiàn)工科專業(yè)特點(diǎn)以及有利于工科學(xué)生的可持續(xù)發(fā)展，更多地體現(xiàn)“人本主義”的特色，更好地促進(jìn)工程教育，，促進(jìn)工科學(xué)生在知識、能力、素質(zhì)全面發(fā)展，為培養(yǎng)卓越優(yōu)秀的工科人才服務(wù)。
[Abstract]:In June 2010, the Ministry of Education launched the "excellent Engineers Education and training Program", each university is exploring the "excellent engineer" training programs and methods. Each discipline also strives to reform its own teaching mode and content to serve the purpose of cultivating outstanding engineering talents. College physics is a compulsory basic course for engineering majors. How can the teaching mode and teaching contents be more in line with the characteristics of engineering majors, and how to better cultivate the ability and quality of engineering students? How to better promote the growth of engineering students is a problem to be actively faced and pondered in college physics teaching. Under the background of "excellent engineer Education and training Program", this paper systematically analyzes and compares the teaching situation of physics between the signatory countries of the "Washington Agreement" and China's engineering universities, aiming at the mutual recognition of engineers' academic qualifications at the undergraduate stage. The characteristics of curriculum and textbook construction are analyzed. The contents of teaching and the arrangement of teaching materials for well-known signatories to the Washington Agreement, The exercises are compared with the basic requirements for Physics Teaching in Universities of Science and Engineering, promulgated by the National Ministry of Education, and the teaching contents of physics textbooks of well-known universities in China. This paper compares the physics curriculum of the engineering university in China with that of the university physics in the signatory country of the Washington Agreement, and analyzes the teaching content and curriculum design of the physics course in the engineering university between the signatory country and our country. The differences in the construction of teaching materials, combined with the foundation of physics teaching objects in engineering universities in China and the actual situation of engineering education in China, are summarized and the enlightenment of the comparative study to the reform of physics teaching in engineering universities in China is summarized. The paper points out that on the basis of retaining advantages in physics teaching of engineering universities in our country, we should pay attention to the cultivation of innovation ability and the improvement of problem-solving ability on the basis of retaining advantages in teaching content, curriculum and textbook construction. It is necessary to embody the characteristics of engineering specialty and be beneficial to the sustainable development of engineering students, to embody the characteristics of humanism, to promote engineering education, and to promote the all-round development of engineering students in knowledge, ability and quality. To train outstanding engineering personnel service.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：合肥工業(yè)大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2013
【分類號】：O4-4;G642

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前4條

1 孟大敏;曹漢軍;胡亞敏;武敏;何曉雄;;《華盛頓協(xié)議》對我國工科物理教育的啟示[J];合肥工業(yè)大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(社會科學(xué)版);2010年04期

2 楊柳;;比較研究法淺析[J];黑龍江教育學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2010年06期

3 王玲;雷環(huán);;《華盛頓協(xié)議》簽約成員的工程教育認(rèn)證特點(diǎn)及其對我國的啟示[J];清華大學(xué)教育研究;2008年05期

4 陳向東;唐曉峰;鄭從義;;中外微生物學(xué)教材建設(shè)狀況調(diào)查與分析比較[J];微生物學(xué)通報(bào);2008年12期

本文編號：2011499