本文選題：科學(xué)推理能力 + 原始物理問題��； 參考：《首都師范大學(xué)》2013年碩士論文

【摘要】：科學(xué)推理能力是科學(xué)探究的一個重要組成部分,當(dāng)前基礎(chǔ)物理課程改革提倡科學(xué)探究,培養(yǎng)學(xué)生的科學(xué)推理能力,但是它與物理問題解決能力之間是否相關(guān)?當(dāng)今的物理師范專業(yè)本科生的科學(xué)推理能力和物理問題的解決能力都處于怎樣的一種水平?這些問題都是值得研究的。 本文選取首都師范大學(xué)物理師范本科生為研究對象,采用問卷調(diào)查的教育學(xué)研究方法和統(tǒng)計學(xué)研究方法,對物理系師范本科生的科學(xué)推理能力水平和物理問題解決能力水平進(jìn)行測試,并且對兩種能力間的相關(guān)性做了研究。 首先應(yīng)用LCTSR科學(xué)推理能力測試量表對物理師范本科生的科學(xué)推理能力水平進(jìn)行測試,將測試結(jié)果應(yīng)用EXCEL做圖分析,結(jié)果顯示物理師范本科生的科學(xué)推理能力大都處于中等水平。進(jìn)一步對LCTSR科學(xué)推理能力測試量表的六個維度進(jìn)行對比分析研究。結(jié)果顯示體積質(zhì)量守恒和比例推理能力這兩個維度的推理能力較好,而控制變量推理,概率推理,相關(guān)推理和假設(shè)演繹推理四個維度的推理能力水平較低。 然后應(yīng)用原始物理問題測試工具,對物理師范本科生物理問題解決能力進(jìn)行測試,將測試結(jié)果應(yīng)用EXCEL作圖分析,結(jié)果顯示物理師范本科生的物理問題解決能力都處于較低水平。 最后將上述兩個測試的結(jié)果應(yīng)用SPSS17軟件進(jìn)行相關(guān)性檢驗,結(jié)果表明,科學(xué)推理能力與物理問題解決能力的相關(guān)性極弱,可以視為不相關(guān)。由于LCTSR的科學(xué)推理能力測試主要包括六個維度即體積質(zhì)量守恒,比例推理,控制變量推理,概率推理,相關(guān)推理及假設(shè)演繹推理。本文分別應(yīng)用SPSS17軟件研究了各個維度與物理問題解決能力的相關(guān)性,數(shù)據(jù)顯示各個維度與物理問題解決能力相關(guān)性極弱可視為不相關(guān)。 本文力圖了解物理師范本科生的科學(xué)推理能力及物理問題解決能力的真實水平,以及兩者間的相關(guān)性�；谘芯拷Y(jié)果,論文提出了教學(xué)建議以期對物理教學(xué)有所裨益。
[Abstract]:The ability of scientific reasoning is an important part of scientific inquiry. At present, the reform of basic physics curriculum advocates scientific inquiry and cultivates students' ability of scientific reasoning, but is it related to the ability of solving physical problems? What is the level of the ability of scientific reasoning and the ability of solving physics problems of the undergraduates majoring in physics teacher training? These problems are worth studying. This paper chooses the physics normal college students of Capital normal University as the research object, adopts the pedagogy research method and the statistical research method of the questionnaire. The scientific reasoning ability and the physics problem-solving ability of the undergraduate students in physics department are tested. The correlation between the two abilities is studied. Firstly, the LCTSR scale is used to test the level of scientific reasoning ability of physics teachers, and the results are analyzed by excel. The results show that the scientific reasoning ability of physics normal undergraduates is mostly at the medium level. Furthermore, the six dimensions of the LCTSR Scientific reasoning ability Test scale (LCTSR) were compared and analyzed. The results show that the volume mass conservation and proportional reasoning ability are better than control variable reasoning and probability reasoning. The reasoning ability of the four dimensions of related reasoning and hypothetical deductive reasoning is relatively low. Then the physical problem solving ability of physics normal undergraduates is tested by using the original physics problem test tool, and the test results are analyzed by excel. The results show that the physics problem solving ability of physics normal undergraduates is at a low level. Finally, the results of the above two tests are tested by SPSS17 software, and the results show that, The correlation between scientific reasoning ability and physical problem solving ability is very weak and can be regarded as irrelevant. The test of LCTSR's scientific reasoning ability includes six dimensions: volume mass conservation, proportional reasoning, control variable reasoning, probabilistic reasoning, correlation reasoning and hypothesis-deductive reasoning. In this paper, we use SPSS17 software to study the correlation between each dimension and physical problem solving ability. The data show that the correlation between each dimension and physical problem-solving ability is very weak. This paper tries to understand the scientific reasoning ability and the real level of physical problem-solving ability of physics normal undergraduates and the correlation between them. Based on the research results, the paper puts forward some teaching suggestions in order to benefit physics teaching.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：首都師范大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2013
【分類號】：G652.4;O4-4

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 魏昕;郭玉英;徐燕;;中小學(xué)生科學(xué)推理能力發(fā)展現(xiàn)狀研究——以北京市中小學(xué)生為樣本[J];北京師范大學(xué)學(xué)報(自然科學(xué)版);2011年05期

2 于克明;談“原始問題”與能力培養(yǎng)[J];大學(xué)物理;1997年05期

3 張軼炳;白明俠;黃昭;;西部地區(qū)大學(xué)生科學(xué)推理能力研究——以寧夏大學(xué)為例[J];淮陰工學(xué)院學(xué)報;2011年02期

4 邢紅軍,陳清梅;論原始物理問題的教育價值及其啟示[J];課程.教材.教法;2005年01期

5 邢紅軍;;原始問題教學(xué):物理教育改革的新視域[J];課程.教材.教法;2007年05期

6 邢紅軍;陳清梅;;原始物理問題測量工具：編制與研究[J];課程.教材.教法;2008年11期

7 邢紅軍;;自組織表征理論:一種物理問題解決的新理論[J];課程.教材.教法;2009年04期

8 王瑛;;皮亞杰兒童認(rèn)知發(fā)展的研究[J];呂梁教育學(xué)院學(xué)報;2012年01期

9 孫清祥;;論皮亞杰認(rèn)知發(fā)展階段理論及其對教育的啟示分析[J];南昌高專學(xué)報;2012年01期

10 王靜,邢紅軍;論原始物理問題的特性及其教育功能[J];平頂山師專學(xué)報;2004年05期

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前3條

1 王靜;高中學(xué)生解決力學(xué)原始物理問題與物理習(xí)題的比較研究[D];首都師范大學(xué);2005年

2 劉利;運(yùn)用原始物理問題培養(yǎng)中學(xué)生物理能力的實踐研究[D];首都師范大學(xué);2006年

3 徐利華;高中生解決電磁學(xué)原始問題的口語報告研究[D];首都師范大學(xué);2009年

，

本文編號：2000896