本文選題：嚴(yán)復(fù) + 北京大學(xué)　； 參考：《北京大學(xué)教育評(píng)論》2013年02期

【摘要】：民元北大校長(zhǎng)嚴(yán)復(fù)被迫去職,主要由兩股力量促成:一為教育部的反嚴(yán)者,特別是次長(zhǎng)董鴻yN、參事蔣維喬等;一為北大學(xué)生中的少數(shù)激進(jìn)革命分子,以理科化學(xué)門的彭佛公為代表。嚴(yán)復(fù)在處理北大事務(wù)過(guò)程中與教育部之間產(chǎn)生的尖銳矛盾和沖突,是后者決心將其更換的主要原因;同時(shí)他吸食鴉片、作風(fēng)散漫的毛病,也為新派人物所不能容忍;而他公然違背國(guó)務(wù)院通令和教育部照會(huì)、接受總統(tǒng)府顧問(wèn)官兼職,則使其落炳于教育部,成為后者發(fā)難的契機(jī)。但由于嚴(yán)復(fù)得到袁世凱和絕大多數(shù)教職員、學(xué)生支持,教育部反嚴(yán)者采取了非正常手段,利用在報(bào)社服務(wù)、曾經(jīng)造謠攻擊過(guò)嚴(yán)復(fù)的彭佛公,制造了嚴(yán)復(fù)在前門車站"攜煙被拘"的謠言,使嚴(yán)復(fù)吸食鴉片的隱私由一個(gè)小范圍而曝光于天下,從而飽受攻擊與非議,不得不去職。對(duì)北大而言,嚴(yán)復(fù)被迫去職不但是教育與學(xué)術(shù)上的失敗,而且引發(fā)了學(xué)生同此后幾任校長(zhǎng)及教育部之間持續(xù)不斷的沖突。
[Abstract]:President Yan Fu of Peking University was forced to leave his post, mainly driven by two forces: first, anti-martial workers of the Ministry of Education, especially Dong Hongyn, deputy minister, and Chiang Wei-chiao, counsellor; and a small number of radical revolutionaries among the students of Peking University. Represented by Pang Foh-kung of the Chemical Department of Science. The sharp contradictions and conflicts between Yan Fu and the Ministry of Education in the course of dealing with the affairs of Peking University are the main reasons for the latter's determination to replace them, at the same time, his habit of smoking opium and his loose style are also not tolerated by the new school figures. In flagrant violation of the State Council's order and the Ministry of Education's notes, he accepted the Presidential Office adviser as a part-time official, making him an opportunity for the Ministry of Education. But because Yan Fu has the support of Yuan Shikai and the vast majority of staff and students, anti-martial workers in the Ministry of Education have taken unusual measures to use newspaper services to attack Pang Foong, who has been accused of spreading rumors against Yan Fu. The rumor that Yan Fu was "smoking and detained" at Qianmen Station exposed the privacy of Yan Fu's opium use from a small area, resulting in criticism and criticism that forced Yan Fu to step down. For Peking University, Yan Fu's forced resignation was not only an educational and academic failure, but also a continuing clash between students and subsequent principals and ministries of education.
【作者單位】： 北京大學(xué)歷史系;
【分類號(hào)】：G649.29;K825.46

【共引文獻(xiàn)】

中國(guó)期刊全文數(shù)據(jù)庫(kù) 前10條

1 沈弘;;中西文化藝術(shù)交流的一朵奇葩——雜議話劇在中國(guó)的起源和發(fā)展[J];文化藝術(shù)研究;2011年04期

2 李子江;楊志;;我國(guó)高考加分政策演變的制度分析——基于歷史制度主義的分析范式[J];清華大學(xué)教育研究;2011年01期

3 馬忠文;;寇連材之死與“烈宦”的誕生[J];清華大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(哲學(xué)社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2012年03期

4 韓濤;;司法變奏的政治底色——以汪兆銘謀刺載灃案為中心[J];清華法律評(píng)論;2009年01期

5 張昭軍;;從復(fù)“義理之�！钡窖浴傲x理之變”——清代今文經(jīng)學(xué)家與程朱理學(xué)關(guān)系辨析[J];清史研究;2010年02期

6 劉少虎;;王，

本文編號(hào)：1947315