本文選題：學(xué)術(shù)權(quán)力 + 合法性�。� 參考：《蘇州大學(xué)》2013年碩士論文

【摘要】：自20世紀(jì)60年代以來(lái)，世界范圍內(nèi)展開關(guān)于“教育危機(jī)”或“大學(xué)危機(jī)”的討論，從歐美到發(fā)展中國(guó)家逐漸成為一種批判力量，從媒體對(duì)于各種學(xué)術(shù)丑聞、研究欺詐以及用人舞弊的關(guān)注上充分顯示了公眾對(duì)高等教育的不滿�；诖髮W(xué)內(nèi)部管理體制的探析，大學(xué)學(xué)術(shù)權(quán)力的式微和錯(cuò)位直接導(dǎo)致了現(xiàn)代大學(xué)的危機(jī)。由于大學(xué)權(quán)力的特殊性，學(xué)術(shù)權(quán)力也不同于政治學(xué)中的一般權(quán)力，學(xué)術(shù)權(quán)力的本質(zhì)在于專業(yè)和學(xué)術(shù)能力，那么作為公立高等學(xué)校中科研與教學(xué)任務(wù)的實(shí)質(zhì)承擔(dān)者的高校教師，理應(yīng)成為學(xué)術(shù)權(quán)力的主體，然而現(xiàn)實(shí)卻不容樂(lè)觀，問(wèn)題出現(xiàn)在公立高等學(xué)校教師從聘用到進(jìn)行教學(xué)活動(dòng)，評(píng)價(jià)、晉升、解雇的一系列環(huán)節(jié)之中。近年來(lái)發(fā)生在這些環(huán)節(jié)的訴訟案件也不在少數(shù)，如關(guān)系到教師聘任的“林某訴西北大學(xué)案”，以及由于學(xué)術(shù)權(quán)力的關(guān)系而引起強(qiáng)大反響的“劉燕文訴北京大學(xué)案”等。這些案件的存在，讓我們不得不對(duì)如何構(gòu)建合理的大學(xué)學(xué)術(shù)管理體制進(jìn)行更深層次的思考。 以往對(duì)于高校的學(xué)術(shù)權(quán)力的研究，多停留在呼吁行政權(quán)力的讓步，而且對(duì)學(xué)術(shù)權(quán)力的主體定位不清。筆者希望通過(guò)對(duì)學(xué)術(shù)權(quán)力及其合法性進(jìn)行探究的基礎(chǔ)上，并結(jié)合相關(guān)案例的分析，從法理學(xué)上提出法律規(guī)范權(quán)力的思想，，進(jìn)而對(duì)法律規(guī)范學(xué)術(shù)權(quán)力進(jìn)行實(shí)體法與程序法方面的探究。本文從法律規(guī)范的角度研究高校教師的學(xué)術(shù)權(quán)力，希望學(xué)界更多的關(guān)注高教領(lǐng)域的法制問(wèn)題，使高校不再以“治外法權(quán)”侵害教師的利益，使高教不至于淪陷為法治的“叢林”。
[Abstract]:Since the 1960s, the worldwide discussion on the "education crisis" or "university crisis" has gradually become a critical force from Europe and the United States to developing countries, from the media to various academic scandals. The concern about fraud and fraud is a good sign of public discontent with higher education. Based on the analysis of the internal management system of universities, the decline and dislocation of academic power directly lead to the crisis of modern universities. Because of the particularity of university power, academic power is different from general power in politics. The essence of academic power lies in specialty and academic ability. It is supposed to be the main body of academic power, but the reality is not optimistic. The problems arise in a series of links from hiring to teaching activities, evaluation, promotion and dismissal of teachers in public institutions of higher learning. In recent years, there are not a few litigation cases in these links, such as the case of Lin v. Northwest University, which is related to the appointment of teachers, and the case of Liu Yanwen v. Peking University, which is strongly reverberated by the relationship of academic power, and so on. With the existence of these cases, we have to think about how to construct a reasonable academic management system. In the past, the research on academic power in colleges and universities has mainly focused on appealing for concessions of administrative power and unclear positioning of the subject of academic power. On the basis of probing into academic power and its legitimacy and combining with the analysis of relevant cases, the author hopes to put forward the idea of legal normative power from jurisprudence. Then, the author probes into the substantive law and the procedural law of the legal normative academic power. This paper studies the academic power of university teachers from the angle of legal norms, and hopes that the academic circles will pay more attention to the legal problems in the field of higher education, so that colleges and universities will no longer encroach on teachers' interests by "extraterritorial jurisdiction". So that higher education does not fall into the "jungle" of the rule of law.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：蘇州大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2013
【分類號(hào)】：G645.1;G644;D922.16

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 歷衛(wèi)宏;德國(guó)高等教育體制與管理[J];高等農(nóng)業(yè)教育;2000年10期

2 朱九思;大學(xué)生命的真諦[J];高等教育研究;2000年05期

3 胡建華;;關(guān)于彰顯學(xué)術(shù)權(quán)力的若干問(wèn)題[J];高等教育研究;2007年10期

4 謝安邦,閻光才;高校的權(quán)力結(jié)構(gòu)與權(quán)力結(jié)構(gòu)的調(diào)整——對(duì)我國(guó)高校管理體制改革方向的探索[J];高等教育研究;1998年02期

5 顏丙峰;論高等學(xué)校學(xué)術(shù)權(quán)力的實(shí)施保障及擴(kuò)張限度[J];黑龍江高教研究;2004年02期

6 黎學(xué)平;美國(guó)高校的教師制度[J];杭州師范學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);1998年02期

7 王大泉;;我國(guó)學(xué)位法律制度的特點(diǎn)及其缺陷分析[J];中國(guó)教育法制評(píng)論;2002年00期

8 呂莉莎;;從我國(guó)現(xiàn)實(shí)的學(xué)位糾紛看法律對(duì)高等學(xué)校權(quán)力的約束[J];中國(guó)教育法制評(píng)論;2006年00期

9 許建領(lǐng);論大學(xué)學(xué)術(shù)權(quán)力擴(kuò)張的可能與限度[J];江蘇高教;2001年03期

10 張康之;合法性的思維歷程:從韋伯到哈貝馬斯[J];教學(xué)與研究;2002年03期

相關(guān)重要報(bào)紙文章 前1條

1 知非;[N];人民政協(xié)報(bào);2005年

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前1條

1 高辰年;法律保留原則研究[D];中國(guó)政法大學(xué);2002年

本文編號(hào)：1942341