本文選題：研究型大學(xué)校長 + 任用制度　； 參考：《華中科技大學(xué)》2013年碩士論文

【摘要】：本研究立足于高等教育大眾化背景下我國創(chuàng)建世界一流大學(xué)所面臨的機(jī)遇與挑戰(zhàn)，認(rèn)為建設(shè)世界一流大學(xué)的關(guān)鍵是提高我國研究型大學(xué)校長的水平，而研究型大學(xué)校長任用制度的改善是提高我國研究型大學(xué)校長勝任能力的重要條件，優(yōu)化高水平大學(xué)校長的甄別機(jī)制是我國創(chuàng)建世界一流大學(xué)的必然途徑。面對我國研究型大學(xué)校長任用制度存在的諸多問題，必須加快推進(jìn)大學(xué)校長任用制度改革，在改革的過程中，有效借鑒美國先進(jìn)的大學(xué)校長任用制度，對于完善我國研究型大學(xué)校長制度建設(shè)具有重要意義。 基于對我國大學(xué)校長任用制度研究現(xiàn)狀的把握，本研究主要分為五部分：第一部分，主要闡述了研究問題的來源，對核心概念進(jìn)行了界定，并進(jìn)行了文獻(xiàn)考察。第二部分，分析比較了中美研究型大學(xué)校長任用制度的歷史變遷，從任用制度的形成過程來客觀分析中美研究型大學(xué)校長任用制度的差異。第三部分，著重比較了中美研究型大學(xué)校長的任職資格、遴選主體、遴選過程、職責(zé)與待遇、任職期限等五個(gè)方面的內(nèi)容。第四部分，，對我國研究型大學(xué)校長任用制度存在的主要問題進(jìn)行了分析和歸納，指出存在的主要問題是任職資格標(biāo)準(zhǔn)不明確、遴選主體單一化、遴選過程不透明、待遇與職責(zé)不匹配、任職期限過短。第五部分，探討了美國研究型大學(xué)校長任用制度對我國的啟示。針對我國研究型大學(xué)校長任用制度存在的問題，結(jié)合美國優(yōu)良的制度設(shè)計(jì)，認(rèn)為完善我國研究型大學(xué)校長任用制度的關(guān)鍵在于加強(qiáng)制度改革，明確大學(xué)校長的任職資格標(biāo)準(zhǔn)，實(shí)行政府領(lǐng)導(dǎo)下的多元遴選主體，實(shí)現(xiàn)遴選過程的公開化，提高大學(xué)校長的待遇水平，依據(jù)校長能力采用靈活的任期。此外，還應(yīng)該鼓勵(lì)校長加強(qiáng)自身修養(yǎng)，不斷提高自身綜合素質(zhì)，提高校長的勝任力。
[Abstract]:This study is based on the opportunities and challenges of establishing world-class universities in China under the background of popularization of higher education. It is considered that the key to building world-class universities is to improve the level of presidents of research universities in China. The improvement of the appointment system of research university presidents is an important condition to improve the competence of research university presidents in China. Optimizing the screening mechanism of high-level university presidents is an inevitable way to establish world-class universities in China. In the face of many problems existing in the appointment system of research university presidents in our country, we must accelerate the reform of the appointment system of university presidents. In the process of reform, we should effectively draw lessons from the advanced university presidents appointment system in the United States. It is of great significance to perfect the system construction of research university presidents in our country. Based on the understanding of the present situation of the research on the appointment system of university presidents in China, this research is divided into five parts: the first part mainly expounds the source of the research problems, defines the core concepts and makes a literature review. In the second part, the author analyzes and compares the historical changes of the appointment system of the presidents of research universities in China and the United States, and analyzes objectively the differences between the appointment system of the presidents of the research universities in China and the United States from the forming process of the appointment system. In the third part, the author compares the qualifications, the selection subjects, the selection process, the duties and the treatment, and the term of office of the presidents of the research universities in China and the United States. In the fourth part, the author analyzes and summarizes the main problems existing in the appointment system of research university presidents, and points out that the main problems are that the qualification criteria are not clear, the selection subject is single, and the selection process is not transparent. The salary does not match the duty, the term of office is too short. The fifth part, discusses the American research university president appointment system to our country enlightenment. In view of the problems existing in the appointment system of research university presidents in China and the excellent system design of the United States, it is considered that the key to perfecting the appointment system of research university presidents in our country lies in strengthening the system reform and clarifying the qualification criteria of university presidents. The pluralistic selection subject under the leadership of the government should be implemented, the selection process should be made public, the treatment level of university presidents should be improved, and flexible tenure should be adopted according to the president's ability. In addition, we should encourage principals to strengthen their self-cultivation, constantly improve their comprehensive quality, and improve their competence.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：華中科技大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2013
【分類號】：G647.12

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 張家勇,李敏;淺析美國大學(xué)校長高薪現(xiàn)象[J];比較教育研究;2003年09期

2 馮錚錚;;對教育學(xué)家成為當(dāng)代中國大學(xué)校長的思考[J];大學(xué)(研究與評價(jià));2007年Z1期

3 呂向虹;;大學(xué)校長該任多久——對哈佛大學(xué)校長任期的考察及思考[J];佛山科學(xué)技術(shù)學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào)(社會科學(xué)版);2005年06期

4 李田;;大學(xué)校長選拔:誤區(qū)與出路[J];廣東技術(shù)師范學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2006年05期

5 劉道玉;中國應(yīng)當(dāng)怎樣遴選大學(xué)校長[J];高教探索;2005年02期

6 李聯(lián)明;;美國大學(xué)校長遴選與考核指標(biāo)體系構(gòu)建及價(jià)值借鑒[J];國家教育行政學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2008年06期

7 許國動(dòng);;我國現(xiàn)代大學(xué)校長遴選機(jī)制研究[J];國家教育行政學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2010年06期

8 樊華強(qiáng);;中美研究型大學(xué)校長任期比較研究[J];復(fù)旦教育論壇;2006年05期

9 季誠鈞;;國內(nèi)外大學(xué)校長選拔制度的比較分析[J];華東師范大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(教育科學(xué)版);2007年02期

10 鄧小林,唐莉;略論近代國立大學(xué)校長之任職資格與教師聘任[J];高等教育研究;2005年09期

本文編號：1912915