本文選題：焦點(diǎn)解決 + 奇跡提問(wèn)��； 參考：《浙江理工大學(xué)》2013年碩士論文

【摘要】：奇跡提問(wèn)是焦點(diǎn)解決治療中最有特色的提問(wèn)技術(shù)之一。與傳統(tǒng)原因提問(wèn)的方向不同，奇跡提問(wèn)主要通過(guò)關(guān)注問(wèn)題已經(jīng)解決的未來(lái)，使當(dāng)事人從被問(wèn)題主宰（constraint-saturated）的狀態(tài)中解脫出來(lái)，并據(jù)此設(shè)定具體治療目標(biāo)。以往關(guān)于奇跡提問(wèn)研究主要關(guān)注其在治療中的作用以及治療師如何使用這項(xiàng)技術(shù)以獲得更佳效果，而循證研究相對(duì)較少。為此，本研究采用WehrGrant（2010）紙筆測(cè)驗(yàn)范式，以期探索和驗(yàn)證奇跡提問(wèn)相關(guān)的如下假設(shè)：（1）奇跡提問(wèn)能夠激發(fā)被試即時(shí)積極情緒，并表現(xiàn)出更為積極的心理狀態(tài)；（2）被試對(duì)奇跡提問(wèn)應(yīng)答傾向于更多積極表述并能促進(jìn)其回憶起更多既往較好狀態(tài)的情境；（3）被試陳述問(wèn)題的嚴(yán)重程度、持續(xù)時(shí)間和發(fā)生頻率與接受奇跡提問(wèn)所激發(fā)出的反應(yīng)沒(méi)有關(guān)聯(lián)。 本研究包含了三個(gè)子研究，其中： 研究一，69名大一學(xué)生被隨機(jī)分入奇跡提問(wèn)組（以下稱(chēng)MQ組，N=35）與原因提問(wèn)組（以下稱(chēng)RQ組，N=34），檢驗(yàn)被試接受提問(wèn)后的情緒體驗(yàn)和積極心理狀態(tài)。組內(nèi)比較提示，MQ組被試在接受提問(wèn)后的自評(píng)自我效能感、希望感、積極／消極情緒與之前比較存在顯著差異（p.01），對(duì)照組差異無(wú)顯著性（p.05）。組間比較提示，MQ組被試積極／消極情緒和希望感的前后測(cè)變化與RQ組相比存在顯著差異（p.05）。結(jié)果支持假設(shè)一，即：奇跡提問(wèn)能夠激發(fā)被試即時(shí)積極情緒，并表現(xiàn)出更為積極的心理狀態(tài)。 研究二，59名大一學(xué)生被隨機(jī)分配到MQ組（N=29）與RQ組（N=30），檢驗(yàn)被試對(duì)奇跡提問(wèn)的應(yīng)答傾向及其與被試能夠記錄下的既往較好狀態(tài)情境數(shù)量的相關(guān)關(guān)系。結(jié)果表明，與對(duì)照組比較，MQ組被試應(yīng)答中使用了更多積極語(yǔ)段（p.01）和更少消極語(yǔ)段（p.01），MQ組被試能夠記錄下既往較好狀態(tài)情境的數(shù)量與RQ組存在顯著差異（p.05），積極語(yǔ)段的數(shù)目與被試記錄下既往較好狀態(tài)情境的數(shù)量相關(guān)具有顯著性（p.05）。結(jié)果支持假設(shè)二，即：奇跡提問(wèn)能夠引導(dǎo)被試更為積極地思考與問(wèn)題有關(guān)的內(nèi)容，這種積極的應(yīng)答傾向促進(jìn)被試回憶起更多關(guān)于既往較好狀態(tài)的情境。 研究三，86名大一至大四學(xué)生接受奇跡提問(wèn)，檢驗(yàn)主訴問(wèn)題的嚴(yán)重程度、持續(xù)時(shí)間和發(fā)生頻率與接受應(yīng)答反應(yīng)之間的關(guān)系。結(jié)果提示，，奇跡提問(wèn)所激發(fā)的積極/消極情緒、積極心理狀態(tài)，在提問(wèn)前后的變化與被試對(duì)問(wèn)題主觀報(bào)告的嚴(yán)重程度、持續(xù)時(shí)間和發(fā)生頻率相關(guān)均無(wú)顯著性（p.05）。但被試自評(píng)積極情緒（p.01）和希望感（p.05）在提問(wèn)前后的變化與解決問(wèn)題信心之間相關(guān)具有顯著性。結(jié)果支持了假設(shè)三，即：被試陳述問(wèn)題的嚴(yán)重程度、持續(xù)時(shí)間和發(fā)生頻率與接受奇跡提問(wèn)所激發(fā)出的反應(yīng)之間沒(méi)有關(guān)聯(lián)。
[Abstract]:Wonder question is one of the most characteristic questioning techniques in focus-solving therapy. Different from the traditional reason question, the miracle question is mainly concerned with the future that the problem has been solved, so that the person concerned can be freed from the state of being constrained by the problem, and set the specific treatment goal accordingly. Previous research on miracle questions focused on its role in treatment and how therapists use the technique to achieve better results, while evidence-based research was relatively rare. Therefore, the present study adopts WehrGrant2010) paper and pen test paradigm to explore the hypothesis that the following hypothesis is relevant to the miracle question: 1) the miracle question can stimulate the participants' immediate positive emotion. The subjects showed a more positive psychological state and a more positive response to a miracle question. The subjects tended to express themselves more positively and to promote their recall of more situations in which they had a better past state. (3) the severity of the subjects' statements was found to be more serious than that of the subjects. Duration and frequency of occurrence were not associated with the response stimulated by a miracle question. This study includes three sub-studies, among which: A total of 69 freshmen were randomly assigned to the Miracle question Group (MQ group) and the reason question Group (RQ group) to test the emotional experience and positive psychological state of the subjects after being asked questions. The results showed that there were significant differences in self-evaluation self-efficacy, sense of hope, positive / negative emotion between the MQ group and the former group (P < 0.01), but there was no significant difference between the control group and the control group. The results showed that there was significant difference in positive / negative emotion and hope between MQ group and RQ group. The results support hypothesis one, that is, miracle questioning can stimulate the participants' immediate positive emotion and show a more positive psychological state. In this study, 59 freshmen were randomly assigned to MQ group (n = 29) and RQ group (n = 30) to test the respondents' tendency to respond to miracle questions and their correlation with the number of previous better state situations recorded by the subjects. The results show that Compared with the control group, there were significant differences in the number of positive segments (p. 01) and negative segments (P. 01) between the MQ group and the RQ group (P. 05), the number of positive speech segments and the number of positive speech segments in the MQ group were significantly different from those in the RQ group. There was a significant correlation between the number of previous good state situations and that of p. 05. The results supported hypothesis two, that is, the miracle question could lead the subjects to think more positively about the content related to the question, and the positive response tendency promoted the subjects to recall more situations about the past better state. In this study, 86 freshmen to senior students were asked miracle questions to test the relationship between the severity of the main complaint problem, duration and frequency of occurrence and the response to the response. The results showed that there was no significant correlation between the positive / negative emotion, the positive psychological state, the changes before and after the question and the severity, duration and frequency of the subjects' subjective report. However, there was a significant correlation between the changes of positive emotion and hope before and after questioning and the confidence in problem-solving. The results support hypothesis three, that is, there is no correlation between the severity, duration and frequency of the subjects' statements and the responses stimulated by the miracle questions.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：浙江理工大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2013
【分類(lèi)號(hào)】：G444;G645.5

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前9條

1 張日f(shuō);徐潔;張?chǎng)?;心理咨詢(xún)與治療研究中的質(zhì)性研究[J];心理科學(xué);2008年03期

2 李超平,時(shí)勘;變革型領(lǐng)導(dǎo)的結(jié)構(gòu)與測(cè)量[J];心理學(xué)報(bào);2005年06期

3 江光榮;心理治療關(guān)系之作用機(jī)制研究述評(píng)[J];心理科學(xué)進(jìn)展;2003年05期

4 張倩;鄭涌;;心理治療的過(guò)程研究[J];心理科學(xué)進(jìn)展;2009年04期

5 江光榮;胡姝婧;;國(guó)內(nèi)心理咨詢(xún)的過(guò)程-效果研究狀況及問(wèn)題[J];心理科學(xué)進(jìn)展;2010年08期

6 邱均平,鄒菲;關(guān)于內(nèi)容分析法的研究[J];中國(guó)圖書(shū)館學(xué)報(bào);2004年02期

7 朱旭;江光榮;;工作同盟的概念[J];中國(guó)臨床心理學(xué)雜志;2011年02期

8 黃麗,楊廷忠,季忠民;正性負(fù)性情緒量表的中國(guó)人群適用性研究[J];中國(guó)心理衛(wèi)生雜志;2003年01期

9 賈曉明;周s

本文編號(hào)：1881399