本文選題：高校輔導(dǎo)員 + 績(jī)效考核　； 參考：《西南交通大學(xué)》2013年碩士論文

【摘要】：隨著我國(guó)高等教育體制改革的深化以及高校逐年的擴(kuò)招,從精英化逐步走向大眾化的高等教育越來越受到人們的關(guān)注,特別是大學(xué)生的綜合素質(zhì)更加成為關(guān)注焦點(diǎn)。高校輔導(dǎo)員作為大學(xué)生思想政治教育的重要組成部分,其工作得到了國(guó)家教育部及相關(guān)部門越來越多的重視。從《中共中央國(guó)務(wù)院關(guān)于進(jìn)一步加強(qiáng)和改進(jìn)大學(xué)生思想政治教育的意見》(中發(fā)[2004]16號(hào))的頒布到教育部《普通高等學(xué)校輔導(dǎo)員隊(duì)伍建設(shè)規(guī)定》的出臺(tái)就可清楚體現(xiàn)出國(guó)家對(duì)大學(xué)生素質(zhì)全面發(fā)展的關(guān)注。 人力資源管理中的重要內(nèi)容之一就是績(jī)效考核。每一個(gè)環(huán)節(jié)都與績(jī)效考核息息相關(guān)：?jiǎn)T工的薪酬分配、培訓(xùn)、職務(wù)升遷、激勵(lì)等。當(dāng)今社會(huì)是人才第一的競(jìng)爭(zhēng)社會(huì),人才競(jìng)爭(zhēng)越來越激烈,高校也開始認(rèn)識(shí)到績(jī)效考核對(duì)實(shí)際工作中的重要性,由此對(duì)包括輔導(dǎo)員績(jī)效考核在內(nèi)的教職工的工作建立了績(jī)效考核體系。 我國(guó)現(xiàn)行的輔導(dǎo)員績(jī)效考核體系發(fā)展尚不成熟,存在著考核指標(biāo)體系設(shè)計(jì)混亂,定性指標(biāo)與定量指標(biāo)得不到有機(jī)結(jié)合,考核主體過于簡(jiǎn)單等諸如此類的問題。這些問題導(dǎo)致輔導(dǎo)員的績(jī)效考核的效果大打折扣,甚至?xí)馆o導(dǎo)員工作積極性受到打擊。因此,分析研究目前高校輔導(dǎo)員工作特點(diǎn)和實(shí)際情況,改進(jìn)完善輔導(dǎo)員績(jī)效考核體系對(duì)于開發(fā)輔導(dǎo)員自身潛力,提高輔導(dǎo)員業(yè)績(jī)是十分有必要的。 本文在詳細(xì)闡述績(jī)效管理與高校輔導(dǎo)員制度相關(guān)理論后,依據(jù)輔導(dǎo)員工作特點(diǎn),結(jié)合輔導(dǎo)員工作實(shí)際,對(duì)CN學(xué)院輔導(dǎo)員績(jī)效考核體系進(jìn)行分析和研究,通過分析輔導(dǎo)員崗位職責(zé)形成職位說明書,用關(guān)鍵績(jī)效指標(biāo)(KPI)法確定考核指標(biāo),并通過層次分析法確定各指標(biāo)權(quán)重,最終采用360度考核法建立了CN學(xué)院輔導(dǎo)員績(jī)效考核體系,并對(duì)新體系的應(yīng)用提出了相關(guān)的政策建議。
[Abstract]:With the deepening of the reform of higher education system and the increasing enrollment of colleges and universities, people pay more and more attention to the higher education from elite to popular, especially the comprehensive quality of college students. As an important part of college students' ideological and political education, college counselors have received more and more attention from the Ministry of Education and related departments. From the promulgation of "opinions of the CPC Central Committee and the State Council on further strengthening and improving the ideological and political Education of College students" (Zhongfa [2004] 16) to the promulgation of the regulations on the Construction of College counselors by the Ministry of Education, it can be clearly reflected. The country pays attention to the all-round development of college students' quality. One of the important contents of human resource management is performance appraisal. Each link is closely related to performance appraisal: salary allocation, training, promotion, motivation, etc. Nowadays, the society is a competitive society with talent first. The competition for talents is becoming more and more intense. Colleges and universities are beginning to realize the importance of performance appraisal in practical work. Therefore, the performance appraisal system is established for the staff including counselors' performance appraisal. The current performance appraisal system of counselors in our country is not mature, there are some problems such as the confusion of the design of evaluation index system, the lack of organic combination of qualitative index and quantitative index, the simplicity of the subject of assessment and so on. These problems make the effect of counselors' performance appraisal greatly reduced, and even the enthusiasm of counselors get hit. Therefore, it is necessary to analyze and study the characteristics and actual situation of college counselors' work and improve the evaluation system of counselors' performance in order to develop the counselors' potential and improve the counselors' performance. After expounding the theory of performance management and college counselors system in detail, according to the work characteristics of counselors and the actual work of counselors, this paper analyzes and studies the performance appraisal system of counselors in CN College. By analyzing the position description of counselors' job responsibilities, determining the evaluation index by using the key performance index (KPI) method, and determining the weight of each index by AHP, finally establishing the evaluation system of the counselors' performance in CN College by using 360 degree assessment method. And put forward the related policy suggestion to the application of the new system.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：西南交通大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2013
【分類號(hào)】：G647.2

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前4條

1 陸興發(fā),袁桂林,翟德智;美國(guó)高等教育自治制度及運(yùn)行模式研究[J];東北電力學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2003年05期

2 劉雨芙;高學(xué)東;;建立科學(xué)的高校輔導(dǎo)員績(jī)效考核體系[J];中國(guó)管理信息化;2011年09期

3 陳劍;張野;張磊;王聰;;香港高校與內(nèi)地高校的學(xué)生事務(wù)管理模式比較[J];北京教育(德育);2012年04期

4 鐘鑫;;高校輔導(dǎo)員績(jī)效管理優(yōu)化研究[J];人力資源管理;2010年10期

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前5條

1 羅怡;CX學(xué)校輔導(dǎo)員績(jī)效考核研究[D];電子科技大學(xué);2011年

2 張藝;四川省獨(dú)立學(xué)院輔導(dǎo)員績(jī)效考評(píng)研究[D];西南財(cái)經(jīng)大學(xué);2011年

3 劉淑慧;關(guān)于ABC大學(xué)輔導(dǎo)員績(jī)效考評(píng)與激勵(lì)的研究[D];東華大學(xué);2005年

4 鄭芬;上海市高校輔導(dǎo)員隊(duì)伍建設(shè)研究[D];上海師范大學(xué);2009年

5 徐颯;高校輔導(dǎo)員績(jī)效考核體系研究[D];中南大學(xué);2009年

，

本文編號(hào)：1800202