發(fā)布時(shí)間：2018-04-24 14:58

  本文選題：中醫(yī)人才培養(yǎng) + 能力結(jié)構(gòu)��； 參考：《山東中醫(yī)藥大學(xué)》2013年碩士論文

【摘要】：目的：分析中醫(yī)學(xué)本科生能力結(jié)構(gòu)，修訂中醫(yī)學(xué)本科生能力自評問卷，進(jìn)一步構(gòu)建和完善中醫(yī)學(xué)本科生評價(jià)體系。 方法：以《中國·中醫(yī)學(xué)本科教育標(biāo)準(zhǔn)》對中醫(yī)學(xué)本科生知識、技能和思想道德和素質(zhì)三方面的要求為基礎(chǔ)，通過文獻(xiàn)綜述和以往對能力的研究修訂中醫(yī)學(xué)本科生的能力要素，采用問卷調(diào)查的方式，進(jìn)一步分析中醫(yī)學(xué)本科生的能力結(jié)構(gòu)。 結(jié)果：用于中醫(yī)學(xué)本科生能力自我評價(jià)的三個(gè)分量表都是由五個(gè)因素組成的，問卷的總體信度及各分量表的總體信度都在0.9左右，各因素的信度在0.7-0.9之間；用于中醫(yī)學(xué)本科生能力客觀問卷經(jīng)過篩選，總體難度在中等范圍之內(nèi)。兩問卷之間以及問卷與各分量表的相關(guān)性顯著。 結(jié)論：中醫(yī)學(xué)本科生能力評價(jià)體系由主觀評價(jià)和客觀評價(jià)兩部分組成，其中主觀評價(jià)部分由三個(gè)分量表組成，每個(gè)分量表都由五個(gè)因素構(gòu)成，且評分標(biāo)準(zhǔn)為1-4級評分標(biāo)準(zhǔn)；客觀評價(jià)由客觀題和主觀題兩部分組成。經(jīng)信效度和相關(guān)性分析表明，主觀自評問卷有很好的信效度，客觀問卷能夠很好的驗(yàn)證主觀問卷。
[Abstract]:Objective: to analyze the ability structure of undergraduates of traditional Chinese medicine (TCM), revise the self-assessment questionnaire of ability of TCM undergraduates, and further construct and perfect the evaluation system of undergraduates of traditional Chinese medicine (TCM). Methods: based on the requirements of Chinese traditional Medicine undergraduate Education Standards in three aspects: knowledge, skill, ideology, morality and quality, the ability factors of Chinese medicine undergraduates were revised through literature review and previous research on competence. A questionnaire survey was used to further analyze the ability structure of undergraduates in traditional Chinese medicine (TCM). Results: the three subscales for ability self-evaluation of Chinese medicine undergraduates were all composed of five factors. The total reliability of the questionnaire and the total reliability of each subscale were about 0.9, and the reliability of each factor was between 0.7-0.9. The objective questionnaire for the ability of Chinese medicine undergraduates was screened, and the overall difficulty was within the middle range. The correlation between the two questionnaires and between the questionnaires and the subscales was significant. Conclusion: the ability evaluation system of Chinese medicine undergraduates is composed of subjective evaluation and objective evaluation. The subjective evaluation is composed of three subscales, each of which is composed of five factors, and the scoring standard is 1-4 grade. Objective evaluation consists of objective questions and subjective questions. The reliability and validity analysis showed that the subjective self-assessment questionnaire had good reliability and validity, and the objective questionnaire could well verify the subjective questionnaire.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：山東中醫(yī)藥大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2013
【分類號】：R-4;G642

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 李勇;王德蕆;;四川中醫(yī)專業(yè)本科畢業(yè)生臨床能力和崗位適應(yīng)性的調(diào)查分析[J];成都中醫(yī)藥大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(教育科學(xué)版);2010年03期

2 陳惠珍;李亞真;蔡建鷹;;中醫(yī)學(xué)生批判性思維能力現(xiàn)狀調(diào)查分析[J];成都中醫(yī)藥大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(教育科學(xué)版);2011年04期

3 張毅,秦明,段渠,李春,公照明;關(guān)于中醫(yī)本科生臨床能力的調(diào)查報(bào)告[J];成都中醫(yī)藥大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào);1997年01期

4 李李;;剪紙課程與中醫(yī)院校人文素質(zhì)培養(yǎng)[J];重慶科技學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2012年09期

5 范涌峰;劉梅;;認(rèn)知心理學(xué)學(xué)習(xí)理論對兒童口語交際能力培養(yǎng)的啟示[J];太原師范學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2010年06期

6 江蓉星;譚漪;劉佳玲;;中醫(yī)學(xué)生臨床工作能力培養(yǎng)與考核的思考[J];成都中醫(yī)藥大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(教育科學(xué)版);2000年02期

7 方群;中醫(yī)學(xué)專業(yè)臨床能力考核方案探討[J];福建中醫(yī)學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2000年02期

8 吳曉義;杜曉穎;;能力概念的多維透視[J];吉林工程技術(shù)師范學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2006年04期

9 王鋼;;師范生專業(yè)實(shí)踐能力的培養(yǎng)——基于現(xiàn)代認(rèn)知心理學(xué)的視角[J];江蘇教育研究;2010年22期

10 閻建平,王美蘭;廣義智力論[J];教育理論與實(shí)踐;2004年09期

，

本文編號：1797119