本文選題：民辦高校 + 國家助學(xué)金��； 參考：《遼寧師范大學(xué)》2015年碩士論文

【摘要】：教育問題越來越受到重視,尤其是高校擴(kuò)招以后,民辦高校數(shù)量劇增。由于民辦高校辦學(xué)經(jīng)費(fèi)主要由自己承擔(dān),導(dǎo)致學(xué)費(fèi)持續(xù)高漲,使一些家庭經(jīng)濟(jì)條件較差的學(xué)生無法享受高等教育的機(jī)會。國家助學(xué)金制度的實(shí)施,為這些貧困學(xué)生創(chuàng)造了求學(xué)機(jī)會,提供了保障。但由于各高校實(shí)施過程中,其評審標(biāo)準(zhǔn)、評審辦法、評審工作流程、實(shí)施方式的不同,導(dǎo)致評審的結(jié)果和效果出現(xiàn)偏差,差強(qiáng)人意,使一些真正需要幫助的學(xué)生未得到實(shí)惠。本研究通過查閱相關(guān)文獻(xiàn)資料,立足民辦高校自身,結(jié)合工作的實(shí)際情況,選取了大連市兩所民辦高校進(jìn)行實(shí)地的走訪座談、問卷調(diào)查,發(fā)現(xiàn)了民辦高校在國家助學(xué)金評審過程中存在著一些問題:評審標(biāo)準(zhǔn)比較模糊單一,缺乏科學(xué)合理性;評審辦法簡單,個別做法不當(dāng);評審工作流程過于粗糙,規(guī)范性較差;評審實(shí)施不到位,重心偏移;評審效果欠佳,部分學(xué)生同學(xué)關(guān)系受到影響,自我約束力下降。經(jīng)過認(rèn)真的分析和研究,整理調(diào)查結(jié)果,本研究提出了一些切實(shí)可行,操作性強(qiáng)的對策建議:一、制定精細(xì)化的定量與定性相結(jié)合的評審標(biāo)準(zhǔn)體系;二、采取多維度的評審辦法;三、確立規(guī)范有效地評審工作流程;四、采取有效地實(shí)施方式;加強(qiáng)對受助學(xué)生的教育和管理。
[Abstract]:More and more attention has been paid to the problem of education, especially after the expansion of colleges and universities, the number of private colleges and universities has increased dramatically. Since private colleges and universities mainly bear the funds for running a school, the tuition fees continue to rise, which makes some students with poor family economic conditions unable to enjoy the opportunity of higher education. The implementation of the state grant system, for these poor students to create opportunities to study, to provide security. However, due to the different evaluation standards, methods, workflow and implementation methods, the results and effects of the review are deviated, so that some students who really need help do not get real benefits. Through consulting the relevant literature, based on the private colleges and universities themselves, combined with the actual situation of the work, two private colleges and universities in Dalian were selected to visit the field, questionnaire survey, It is found that there are some problems in the process of national grant evaluation in private colleges and universities: the evaluation criteria are vague and single, lack of scientific rationality, the evaluation methods are simple, the individual practices are improper, the evaluation work flow is too rough, and the standardization is poor; The evaluation effect is not good, and some students' relationship is affected, and the self-binding force is decreased. After careful analysis and research, and sorting out the investigation results, this study has put forward some feasible and feasible countermeasures and suggestions: first, to formulate a fine evaluation standard system that combines quantitative and qualitative analysis; second, Adopt multi-dimensional evaluation methods; third, establish standardized and effective evaluation work flow; fourth, adopt effective implementation methods; strengthen the education and management of the aided students.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：遼寧師范大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2015
【分類號】：G647

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前9條

1 潘華瑩;;關(guān)于高職院校國家助學(xué)金評選辦法的探索[J];東方企業(yè)文化;2014年05期

2 余瞳;;淺談高校獎助學(xué)金評選困境及對策[J];華章;2013年32期

3 鄭文明;;高職類院校國家獎助學(xué)金評定工作方法探討[J];價值工程;2012年10期

4 蔡穎;;高校國家獎助學(xué)金制度實(shí)施現(xiàn)狀調(diào)查[J];學(xué)校黨建與思想教育;2011年05期

5 靳麗萍;薛皓;;地方高等院校國家獎助學(xué)金評定中的量化模式研究[J];延安大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(社會科學(xué)版);2009年05期

6 黃少玲;;定量與定性相結(jié)合的高校貧困生認(rèn)定機(jī)制初探[J];肇慶學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2009年04期

7 劉鳳;;國家獎助學(xué)金工作中存在的問題及解決辦法[J];河南科技學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2009年01期

8 曾英;;高校國家助學(xué)金評定方法探討[J];現(xiàn)代商貿(mào)工業(yè);2009年04期

9 陳偉伯;任秀芳;李騰龍;;模糊評價法在國家獎助學(xué)金評定工作中的應(yīng)用[J];技術(shù)與創(chuàng)新管理;2007年06期

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前1條

1 薛單;高校助學(xué)金等級評定模型研究及系統(tǒng)開發(fā)[D];北京交通大學(xué);2010年

，

本文編號：1778352