發(fā)布時間：2018-03-22 00:10

  本文選題：大學社會評價　切入點：評價標準　出處：《湖南大學》2013年碩士論文　論文類型：學位論文

【摘要】：隨著高等教育的發(fā)展，社會作為第三方的評價主體對大學的評價作用也日益凸顯。大學的社會評價主要包括認證和排行兩方面，為了更好地對大學教育質量進行評價，需要設置全面、公平、合理及科學的評價標準。評價標準是否客觀、公正、合理決定了大學社會評價的科學性和公正性，決定了其被社會接受和認可的程度。美國作為當今高等教育最發(fā)達的國家之一，其高等教育認證和排行是美國高等教育質量保障體系中的重要組成部分，而我國的高等教育認證和排行發(fā)展稍顯滯后，因而，，筆者選取了中美兩國的大學社會評價標準中具有典型代表的標準進行比較研究。 在認證標準方面，美國選取新英格蘭學校和學院協(xié)會認證標準為例，中國選取普通高等學校本科教學工作水平評估為例，在排行標準方面，美國以《美國新聞與世界報道》為例，中國以武漢大學中國科學評價研究中心發(fā)布的中國高�！案偁幜υu價”為例。在相同點方面：認證標準分別從辦學目的、辦學條件或辦學資源、教育過程以及教育質量的標準分別進行論述；排行標準分別從教育投入、教育過程及教育產出的指標體系進行論述。在不同點方面：認證標準分別從注重學校的自我評估、定性與定量、多樣性和個性化及學生學習結果方面進行論述；排行標準分別從教育質量、科研條件及校友捐贈的指標體系進行論述。同時從政治、文化和技術方面闡述了評價標準產生的原因。最后，在此基礎上，筆者得出了幾點啟示及建議。相關啟示有：轉變政府職能，成立專業(yè)性認證中介機構；立足國情，建立合理的大學分類標準和分類評估；增加排行的信度，擴大數據來源渠道。具體建議有：強調自評為主，重視外部考察與自評相結合；注重定量與定性指標體系相結合；建立一般性指標與個性化指標相結合的指標體系；重視對學生學習結果的評估以及對排行具體指標的設置建議。
[Abstract]:With the development of higher education, the social evaluation of universities, as a third party, is becoming more and more important. The social evaluation of universities mainly includes certification and ranking, in order to better evaluate the quality of university education. It is necessary to set up comprehensive, fair, reasonable and scientific evaluation criteria. Whether the evaluation criteria are objective, fair and reasonable determines the scientific nature and fairness of the university social evaluation. As one of the most developed countries in higher education today, the certification and ranking of higher education in the United States is an important part of the quality assurance system of higher education in the United States. However, the development of higher education certification and ranking in China lags behind. Therefore, the author chooses the representative standard of university social evaluation between China and America to carry on the comparative research. In terms of certification standards, the United States selects the New England School and College Association Certification Standards as an example, China selects the undergraduate teaching level assessment of ordinary institutions of higher learning as an example, and ranks the standards. The United States takes "American News and the World report" as an example, and China takes the "Competitiveness Evaluation" issued by the China Science Evaluation and Research Center of Wuhan University as an example. The conditions or resources for running a school, the educational process and the standards for the quality of education are discussed separately. The index system of educational process and educational output is discussed. In different aspects: certification standards are discussed from the aspects of self-assessment, qualitative and quantitative analysis, diversity and individuation, and students' learning results; The criteria of ranking are discussed from the aspects of education quality, scientific research conditions and the index system of alumni donation. At the same time, the causes of the evaluation criteria are expounded from the political, cultural and technical aspects. Finally, on this basis, The author has obtained several enlightenments and suggestions. The relevant revelations are as follows: transforming government functions, establishing professional certification intermediary organizations; establishing reasonable classification standards and classification evaluation of universities based on national conditions; increasing the reliability of ranking. The concrete suggestions are: emphasizing self-assessment, emphasizing the combination of external inspection and self-assessment, focusing on the combination of quantitative and qualitative index system, establishing the index system of combining general index and individualized index; Attach importance to the evaluation of students' learning results and suggestions for setting up specific indicators for ranking.
【學位授予單位】：湖南大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2013
【分類號】：G649.1

【參考文獻】

相關期刊論文 前10條

1 李守福;論大學的社會評價[J];比較教育研究;2003年05期

2 熊耕;試析美國高等院校認證標準演變的邏輯——以中北部地區(qū)大學與中學協(xié)會的認證標準為例[J];比較教育研究;2004年07期

3 熊耕;美國高等教育認證制度的功能分析[J];比較教育研究;2005年02期

4 李守福;;論大學評價的價值取向[J];比較教育研究;2005年12期

5 高新柱;韓映雄;;美國高等教育認證制度分析——兼議我國高等教育認證制度的走向[J];大學(研究與評價);2009年02期

6 康宏;;美國院校認證標準的價值研究——基于中北部協(xié)會的分析[J];中國高等教育評估;2011年01期

7 施雨丹;;中國高等教育評估的問題及其對策[J];高教探索;2007年02期

8 韓芳;李維U

本文編號：1646175