發(fā)布時(shí)間：2018-03-12 14:08

  本文選題：社會(huì)結(jié)構(gòu)　切入點(diǎn)：行政化　出處：《北京工業(yè)大學(xué)》2013年碩士論文　論文類型：學(xué)位論文

【摘要】：高�！靶姓眴�(wèn)題是上世紀(jì)90年代以來(lái)常被熱議的一個(gè)問(wèn)題，但是究竟什么是“行政化”卻是眾說(shuō)紛紜，難以給出個(gè)統(tǒng)一的標(biāo)準(zhǔn)，因此也有人反駁說(shuō)我國(guó)高校并沒(méi)有“行政化”。對(duì)于這個(gè)問(wèn)題，本文從社會(huì)結(jié)構(gòu)視角出發(fā)，利用“北京市專業(yè)技術(shù)人員收入分配與激勵(lì)機(jī)制調(diào)查”的數(shù)據(jù)資料以及訪談資料，，綜合定性研究與定量研究發(fā)現(xiàn)，高校的社會(huì)結(jié)構(gòu)呈現(xiàn)出權(quán)力因素和技術(shù)因素共同配置資源和機(jī)會(huì)的結(jié)合狀態(tài)，而不是單純地由行政權(quán)力來(lái)決定高校事務(wù)的“行政化”狀態(tài)。而且技術(shù)因素與權(quán)力因素的結(jié)合導(dǎo)致高校權(quán)力集中在了某一特殊群體身上，也就是說(shuō)，真正在高校內(nèi)擁有決定權(quán)的是那些兼任教學(xué)和管理工作的“雙肩挑”群體，他們身兼學(xué)術(shù)職稱，又有著行政級(jí)別，是校內(nèi)行政職能部門領(lǐng)導(dǎo)或院系領(lǐng)導(dǎo)，管理著高校的行政事務(wù)和學(xué)術(shù)事務(wù)。 兼任教學(xué)與管理的“雙肩挑”群體的產(chǎn)生有其一定的歷史原因，在早期也發(fā)揮了積極作用，但是由于高校內(nèi)的大部分資源和機(jī)會(huì)都掌握在他們的手中，這種權(quán)力的集中以及向上偏移，導(dǎo)致了高校出現(xiàn)了行政泛化，并由此產(chǎn)生了分配不公的問(wèn)題。加之普通教師缺少民主參與高校事務(wù)的權(quán)利，使得普通教師群體和一般行政人員的工作積極性都不高，這些都嚴(yán)重影響了高校的良性發(fā)展。 為了解決上述問(wèn)題，必須要從根源下手，才能起到治本之效。本文認(rèn)為，高校的行政管理不可或缺，為了遏制行政權(quán)力泛化的影響，應(yīng)當(dāng)從高�，F(xiàn)在的社會(huì)結(jié)構(gòu)形態(tài)入手，分離權(quán)力因素和技術(shù)因素對(duì)校內(nèi)資源和機(jī)會(huì)分配的影響，抑制學(xué)校行政權(quán)力的膨脹，擴(kuò)大學(xué)術(shù)機(jī)構(gòu)的權(quán)力，讓行政權(quán)力服務(wù)于學(xué)術(shù)研究。
[Abstract]:The issue of "administration" in colleges and universities has been a hot topic since -10s, but there are different opinions on what is "administrative", and it is difficult to give a unified standard. Therefore, some people also retort that there is no "administrative system" in Chinese universities. For this problem, this paper, from the perspective of social structure, makes use of the data and interviews of "investigation of income Distribution and incentive Mechanism of Professional and Technical personnel in Beijing". Comprehensive qualitative and quantitative studies show that the social structure of colleges and universities presents a combination of power factors and technical factors in the allocation of resources and opportunities. It is not simply administrative power that determines the "administrative" state of university affairs. Moreover, the combination of technical factors and power factors leads to the concentration of university power on a special group, that is, Those who really have the right to make decisions in colleges and universities are those "shoulder-picking" groups who are concurrently engaged in teaching and management work. They have academic titles and have administrative levels. They are the heads of administrative departments or departments in schools. To manage the administrative affairs and academic affairs of colleges and universities. There are some historical reasons for the emergence of the "shoulder-picking" group in teaching and management, which also played a positive role in the early stage. However, most of the resources and opportunities in colleges and universities are in their hands. This kind of centralization and upward deviation of power has led to the generalization of administration in colleges and universities, and has resulted in the problem of unfair distribution. In addition, ordinary teachers lack the right to participate in the affairs of colleges and universities democratically. As a result, the working enthusiasm of ordinary teachers and administrative staff is not high, which seriously affects the benign development of colleges and universities. In order to solve the above problems, we must start with the root causes in order to deal with the root causes. This paper holds that the administration of colleges and universities is indispensable, and in order to contain the influence of the generalization of administrative power, we should start with the present social structure of colleges and universities. By separating the influence of power factors and technical factors on the distribution of resources and opportunities in schools, we can restrain the expansion of school administrative power, expand the power of academic institutions, and let administrative power serve academic research.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：北京工業(yè)大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2013
【分類號(hào)】：G647

【相似文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 王慶雨;;高等院校行政化的思考[J];遼寧教育行政學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2010年05期

2 韓冰;;教育去行政化的社會(huì)瓶頸[J];w

本文編號(hào)：1601891