發(fā)布時間：2018-03-08 13:25

  本文選題：公立高校　切入點(diǎn)：受教育平等權(quán)　出處：《復(fù)旦大學(xué)》2013年碩士論文　論文類型：學(xué)位論文

【摘要】：受教育權(quán)作為一種社會權(quán)被寫入憲法,公民平等地接受教育是受教育權(quán)的內(nèi)在要求,也是憲法上平等權(quán)的具體體現(xiàn),因此受教育平等權(quán)是一種憲法權(quán)利。由國家舉辦的公共教育,受到公共財政的支撐,目的在于實(shí)現(xiàn)公民的受教育權(quán),為國家建設(shè)培養(yǎng)人才,理應(yīng)向公民平等開放。但在我國教育實(shí)踐中,高等教育領(lǐng)域受教育權(quán)不平等的現(xiàn)象非常嚴(yán)重。不平等尤其體現(xiàn)在公立高校招生中對不同的地區(qū)分配不同數(shù)量的名額,造成地域之間接受高等教育的機(jī)會差別巨大上。本文分析了我國受教育不平等的現(xiàn)狀,為其提出符合平等原則的改良方向,探究我國受教育平等權(quán)未能受到保障的原因,并相應(yīng)提出保障受教育平等權(quán)制度上的改革設(shè)想。 本文一共四章。第一章首先介紹了受教育平等權(quán)的概念和性質(zhì),并表明本文關(guān)注的是特定領(lǐng)域的受教育平等權(quán),即公立高等教育領(lǐng)域,招生活動中的受教育平等權(quán)。第二章對受教育權(quán)不平等現(xiàn)象在我國的表現(xiàn)進(jìn)行列舉,并且提出作者認(rèn)為平等的招生制度的標(biāo)準(zhǔn)應(yīng)當(dāng)是在擇優(yōu)錄取的基礎(chǔ)上對弱勢群體進(jìn)行補(bǔ)償性的優(yōu)待。第三章研究了我國公立高校招生領(lǐng)域受教育平等權(quán)保障存在諸多問題的原因,包括高校招生制度規(guī)范的缺陷,行政權(quán)力的不當(dāng)使用以及司法救濟(jì)制度的不完善。第四章針對第三章所提出的保障中的缺陷,提出對于保障制度的改革設(shè)想。
[Abstract]:The right to education, as a social right, is written into the Constitution, and the equal education of citizens is the inherent requirement of the right to education, and it is also the concrete embodiment of the right to equality in the Constitution. Therefore, the right to equality in education is a constitutional right. Public education organized by the state is supported by public finance in order to realize the right of citizens to receive education and to train talents for the construction of the country. It is supposed to be open to citizens on an equal footing. However, in our country's educational practice, the inequality of the right to receive education in higher education is very serious. The inequality is reflected in the allocation of different numbers of places to different regions in the enrollment of public colleges and universities. This paper analyzes the present situation of the inequality of education in our country, puts forward the direction of improvement in conformity with the principle of equality, and explores the reasons why the right to equality of education in our country has not been guaranteed. And the corresponding protection of the right to education on the system of reform ideas. The first chapter introduces the concept and nature of the right to equality in education, and shows that this paper is concerned with the right to equality of education in a specific field, that is, the field of public higher education. The right to equal access to education in enrollment activities. Chapter two enumerates the manifestations of inequality in the right to education in China. The author also suggests that the standard of equal enrollment system should be to compensate the disadvantaged groups on the basis of merit-based admission. Chapter three studies the existence of the guarantee of equal right to education in the field of enrollment in public universities and colleges in China. The causes of many problems, It includes the defects of the admission system of colleges and universities, the improper use of the administrative power and the imperfection of the judicial remedy system. Chapter 4th puts forward a tentative plan for the reform of the security system in view of the defects in the security system put forward in the third chapter.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：復(fù)旦大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2013
【分類號】：G647.32

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 李少華;大學(xué)理念與現(xiàn)代大學(xué)制度[J];北京大學(xué)教育評論;2005年S1期

2 覃紅霞;;招生領(lǐng)域高校與學(xué)生的法律關(guān)系研究[J];北京大學(xué)教育評論;2010年02期

3 朱新梅;;重構(gòu)政府與公立高校之間的法律關(guān)系[J];北京師范大學(xué)學(xué)報(社會科學(xué)版);2004年04期

4 韓大元,王世濤;“兩個人權(quán)公約”與我國人權(quán)憲政體制的整合[J];法律科學(xué).西北政法學(xué)院學(xué)報;2001年02期

5 張千帆;;大學(xué)招生考試多元化的憲法底線——兼論高考分省自主命題與大學(xué)自主招生制度的違憲性[J];法商研究;2010年05期

6 劉均勻;;論高等學(xué)校自治與法治[J];法學(xué)雜志;2010年01期

7 周友軍;;德國民法上的公法人制度研究[J];法學(xué)家;2007年04期

8 許維利;黃俊浩;;司法審查高校招生行為的法理分析[J];高教探索;2005年04期

9 白呈明;高校與學(xué)生合同關(guān)系探討[J];復(fù)旦教育論壇;2003年06期

10 馬曉燕;;大學(xué)自治權(quán)的法源探析——基于學(xué)術(shù)自由制度性保障的視角[J];復(fù)旦教育論壇;2008年02期

，

本文編號：1584084