本文關(guān)鍵詞： 產(chǎn)學(xué)研合作教育 角色建構(gòu) 問(wèn)題分析 改進(jìn)建議　出處：《曲阜師范大學(xué)》2013年碩士論文　論文類型：學(xué)位論文

【摘要】：近年來(lái)，隨著知識(shí)經(jīng)濟(jì)和市場(chǎng)經(jīng)濟(jì)的不斷深入發(fā)展,國(guó)家財(cái)政對(duì)教育投入的大幅增長(zhǎng)，產(chǎn)學(xué)研合作教育模式取得的飛速發(fā)展和階段性成果。但該模式的教育供給和廣大人民群眾對(duì)優(yōu)質(zhì)教育資源的需求之間，還存在著一定的距離。在借鑒美國(guó)、日本、德國(guó)等先進(jìn)發(fā)達(dá)國(guó)家的產(chǎn)學(xué)研合作教育模式的發(fā)展經(jīng)驗(yàn)的同時(shí)，結(jié)合我國(guó)產(chǎn)學(xué)研合作教育模式的發(fā)展歷程和國(guó)內(nèi)現(xiàn)階段的相關(guān)研究，提出高校在產(chǎn)學(xué)研合作教育發(fā)展中的幾種主要角色建構(gòu)模式，這對(duì)探究高校在產(chǎn)學(xué)研合作教育模式發(fā)展中的角色轉(zhuǎn)變具有很重要的意義。 借助分工演進(jìn)理論、新興古典經(jīng)濟(jì)學(xué)和激勵(lì)理論，發(fā)現(xiàn)高校在產(chǎn)學(xué)研合作教育模式發(fā)展中的角色建構(gòu)中存在著如下問(wèn)題：參與者及其相互之間的關(guān)系復(fù)雜，交易成本較高，主要是顯性交易成本和隱形交易成本；供求不平衡，表現(xiàn)為供過(guò)于求或者供大于求，即教育供求雙方的愿望都得不到滿足，教育的供給量和需求量不相等；教育機(jī)會(huì)供給與個(gè)人需求不平衡，教育產(chǎn)品供給與社會(huì)用人單位需求的不平衡；完善的合作成果獎(jiǎng)勵(lì)機(jī)制和激勵(lì)機(jī)制尚未建立，全方位的績(jī)效考核指標(biāo)體系不健全，導(dǎo)致了在產(chǎn)學(xué)研合作中各利益方的主觀意向和能動(dòng)性不足，高校自身的投入和產(chǎn)出不協(xié)調(diào)，即利益分配不健全；知識(shí)轉(zhuǎn)移效率低，涉及到高校和科研機(jī)構(gòu)、企業(yè)、知識(shí)、專家、中介機(jī)構(gòu)、轉(zhuǎn)移情景幾個(gè)相關(guān)主體；由發(fā)展環(huán)境混亂、缺乏有效監(jiān)管、服務(wù)內(nèi)容單一、從業(yè)人員提供的服務(wù)水平與層次偏低、創(chuàng)新主體關(guān)系游離導(dǎo)致的科技中介服務(wù)體系不完善。 根據(jù)實(shí)際情況，可以提出這樣的管理策略和制度改進(jìn)建議：一是保障教育持續(xù)穩(wěn)定發(fā)展所需投入，明確“以政府撥款為主，其他多種渠道為輔”的多元化高等教育投資體制，保證高校產(chǎn)學(xué)研合作教育模式的順利進(jìn)行，實(shí)現(xiàn)各合作方和社會(huì)各界的“多贏”；二是充分發(fā)揮高校的自身優(yōu)勢(shì)，促使高等教育逐步成為社會(huì)的中心、知識(shí)經(jīng)濟(jì)的發(fā)動(dòng)機(jī)、知識(shí)經(jīng)濟(jì)社會(huì)運(yùn)轉(zhuǎn)的軸心、科教興國(guó)的主力軍；三是完善產(chǎn)學(xué)研合作教育評(píng)估體系，有原則、有標(biāo)準(zhǔn)的綜合運(yùn)用多種評(píng)價(jià)方式；四是完善激勵(lì)機(jī)制，充分考慮產(chǎn)學(xué)研合作中高校角色構(gòu)建的保健因素和激勵(lì)因素；五是通過(guò)明確科技服務(wù)項(xiàng)目，，完善服務(wù)內(nèi)容、增強(qiáng)內(nèi)部人員素質(zhì)，提高服務(wù)效率、加強(qiáng)與國(guó)內(nèi)外科技中介機(jī)構(gòu)的合作充分發(fā)揮科技中介機(jī)構(gòu)的橋梁作用。當(dāng)前應(yīng)善于借助這些制度措施，進(jìn)最大限度發(fā)揮高校教育資源的優(yōu)勢(shì)，提高其辦學(xué)水平與教學(xué)質(zhì)量，從而實(shí)現(xiàn)多贏的發(fā)展目標(biāo)。
[Abstract]:In recent years, with the continuous development of knowledge economy and market economy, the national financial investment in education has increased substantially. The rapid development and stage achievement of the cooperative education model of industry, college and research. However, there is still a certain distance between the educational supply of this model and the demand for high-quality education resources by the broad masses of the people, so as to draw lessons from the United States. Japan, Germany and other advanced developed countries in the development of the model of industry-university-research cooperation education experience, combined with the development of China's industry-university-research cooperative education model development process and domestic research at the present stage. It is of great significance to explore the role transformation of colleges and universities in the development of industry-university-research cooperative education mode by putting forward several main role construction models in the development of production-university-research cooperative education. With the help of the theory of division of labor evolution, new classical economics and incentive theory, it is found that there are the following problems in the role construction of colleges and universities in the development of industry-university-research cooperative education mode: the participants and their relationship are complex. The transaction cost is high, mainly the explicit transaction cost and the invisible transaction cost; The imbalance of supply and demand is manifested in oversupply or oversupply, that is, the desire of both sides of educational supply and demand is not satisfied, and the quantity of supply and demand of education is not equal; The imbalance between the supply of educational opportunities and the demand of individuals, and the imbalance between the supply of educational products and the demand of social employers; The perfect reward mechanism and incentive mechanism of cooperation results have not been established, and the comprehensive performance appraisal index system is not perfect, which leads to the lack of subjective intention and initiative of all stakeholders in the cooperation of industry, college and research. The input and output of colleges and universities are not coordinated, that is, the distribution of benefits is not perfect; The efficiency of knowledge transfer is low, which involves several related subjects such as universities and scientific research institutions, enterprises, knowledge, experts, intermediary organizations and transfer scenarios. Due to the confusion of development environment, lack of effective supervision, single service content, low level and level of service provided by practitioners, imperfect service system of science and technology intermediary caused by the dissociation of innovation subject relationship. According to the actual situation, we can put forward such management strategy and system improvement suggestions: first, to ensure the sustained and stable development of education needs investment, clearly "mainly on government funding." The diversified investment system of higher education, which is supplemented by various other channels, ensures the smooth progress of the cooperative education mode of production, college and research in colleges and universities, and realizes the "multi-win" of each partner and all walks of life of the society; Second, give full play to the advantages of colleges and universities, and promote higher education to gradually become the center of society, the engine of knowledge economy, the axis of the operation of knowledge economy society, and the main force of revitalizing the country through science and education; Third, improve the evaluation system of industry-university-research cooperation education, have principles and standards of comprehensive use of a variety of evaluation methods; Fourth, perfect the incentive mechanism and fully consider the health care factors and incentive factors of the role construction of universities in the cooperation of industry, college and research; Fifth, through the clear science and technology service project, consummates the service content, enhances the internal personnel quality, enhances the service efficiency. Strengthen the cooperation with domestic and foreign science and technology intermediary organizations to give full play to the bridge role of science and technology intermediary organizations. At present, we should be good at taking advantage of these system measures to maximize the advantages of educational resources in colleges and universities. Improve the level of running schools and teaching quality, so as to achieve the development goal of win-win.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：曲阜師范大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2013
【分類號(hào)】：G647

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 ;創(chuàng)新型國(guó)家建設(shè)國(guó)外經(jīng)驗(yàn)縱覽(上)[J];安徽科技;2007年04期

2 ;創(chuàng)新型國(guó)家建設(shè)國(guó)外經(jīng)驗(yàn)縱覽(下)[J];安徽科技;2007年05期

3 許昭敏;熊健;;村級(jí)會(huì)計(jì)委托代理制的新制度經(jīng)濟(jì)學(xué)分析[J];安徽農(nóng)學(xué)通報(bào);2007年08期

4 顧偉忠;劉蘭;;我國(guó)產(chǎn)學(xué)研合作存在的問(wèn)題及其政策研究[J];北京機(jī)械工業(yè)學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2006年01期

5 黃禮健;吳祈宗;張強(qiáng);;具有模糊聯(lián)盟值的n人合作博弈的模糊Shapley值[J];北京理工大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào);2007年08期

6 謝逢潔,劉書慶;管理者最優(yōu)監(jiān)督幅度的研究[J];商業(yè)研究;2004年17期

7 陸興發(fā);翟勇洪;羅靖;;企業(yè)激勵(lì)機(jī)制的博弈分析[J];商業(yè)研究;2006年24期

8 劉福滿,于紅莉;對(duì)目前我國(guó)產(chǎn)學(xué)研合作問(wèn)題的幾點(diǎn)思考[J];長(zhǎng)春大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào);2001年02期

9 李成虎;高云;;關(guān)于開展高校研究生創(chuàng)業(yè)教育的思考[J];中國(guó)城市經(jīng)濟(jì);2011年08期

10 朱富強(qiáng);;中國(guó)經(jīng)濟(jì)學(xué)范式思考:兩個(gè)層次的契合[J];財(cái)經(jīng)研究;2008年05期

相關(guān)重要報(bào)紙文章 前1條

1 本報(bào)記者 張巧玲;[N];科學(xué)時(shí)報(bào);2010年

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前2條

1 于力;農(nóng)村義務(wù)教育學(xué)校委托管理問(wèn)題研究[D];曲阜師范大學(xué);2011年

2 陳新立;關(guān)于產(chǎn)學(xué)研合作科技創(chuàng)新的制度研究[D];武漢理工大學(xué);2009年

本文編號(hào)：1475517