本文關(guān)鍵詞： 大學(xué)公共選修課程 價(jià)值取向 質(zhì)量保證　出處：《中南民族大學(xué)》2013年碩士論文　論文類型：學(xué)位論文

【摘要】：隨著高等教育管理體制改革的不斷深入，大學(xué)的辦學(xué)自主權(quán)逐漸得到落實(shí)。許多大學(xué)為了加強(qiáng)大學(xué)生文化素質(zhì)的培養(yǎng)，拓寬學(xué)生的知識(shí)領(lǐng)域而紛紛設(shè)置公共選修課程，為學(xué)生創(chuàng)造更多主動(dòng)、自主學(xué)習(xí)的機(jī)會(huì)。應(yīng)該說(shuō)公共選修課取得了一定的成績(jī)和教育效果。但是在各個(gè)高校中，公選課的開設(shè)情況卻良莠不齊，有的可以堂堂爆滿，有的但卻門可羅雀，公共選修課在課程實(shí)施過(guò)程中逐漸暴露出了很多問(wèn)題，公選課的質(zhì)量不容樂(lè)觀。究其根本，還是在于我國(guó)對(duì)公選課的開設(shè)缺乏足夠理論上的支持，對(duì)公共選修課在實(shí)施過(guò)程中可能會(huì)出現(xiàn)的問(wèn)題缺乏足夠的預(yù)見及解決方法，甚至公共選修課應(yīng)該以怎么樣的價(jià)值觀作為開設(shè)指導(dǎo)理念也尚不明確�？傊覈�(guó)公共選修課的開設(shè)缺乏詳盡的自上而下的設(shè)計(jì)。 本研究以高等教育改革和國(guó)際化為背景，通過(guò)研究國(guó)內(nèi)外高校課程質(zhì)量的歷史，總結(jié)其存在的問(wèn)題，分析其經(jīng)驗(yàn)，著重探討大學(xué)公共選修課程在高等教育中的價(jià)值追求與目標(biāo)追求，提出大學(xué)公共選修課程的價(jià)值追求是建立在多元價(jià)值的相互融合基礎(chǔ)之上。其次回顧了大學(xué)公共選修課程的發(fā)展歷程，并在調(diào)查分析的基礎(chǔ)上，從課程的開設(shè)、實(shí)施和管理三個(gè)方面對(duì)大學(xué)公共選修課程存在的問(wèn)題進(jìn)行了反思。最后在探討大學(xué)公共選修課程質(zhì)量保證的實(shí)現(xiàn)途徑時(shí)，筆者著重從大學(xué)公共選修課程的內(nèi)部質(zhì)量保證構(gòu)建進(jìn)行分析，分別在輸入、過(guò)程和輸出階段提出相應(yīng)的保證策略。本文共分四章： 第一章導(dǎo)論部分主要介紹了選題緣由與研究意義、主要研究?jī)?nèi)容與研究方法、相關(guān)文獻(xiàn)綜述及相關(guān)概念的界定。 第二章重點(diǎn)闡述了大學(xué)公共選修課程的價(jià)值追求與目標(biāo)追求。大學(xué)公共選修課程的價(jià)值取向既有工具性價(jià)值和社會(huì)價(jià)值，也有注重民族文化傳統(tǒng)的價(jià)值追求、回歸人類活動(dòng)的價(jià)值追求以及促進(jìn)個(gè)體發(fā)展的價(jià)值追求。公選課的價(jià)值追求是多元價(jià)值的融合。大學(xué)公共選修課程的目標(biāo)追求則主要是致力于促進(jìn)學(xué)生知識(shí)和價(jià)值結(jié)構(gòu)的完善、個(gè)性的發(fā)展、能力和社會(huì)責(zé)任感的培養(yǎng)。 第三章是對(duì)我國(guó)大學(xué)公共選修課程的反思。在文獻(xiàn)研究和調(diào)查分析的基礎(chǔ)上分析公共選修課實(shí)施過(guò)程中存在的問(wèn)題，如公共選課存量少，在整個(gè)大學(xué)課程中所占比例低，，開課隨意性強(qiáng)，學(xué)生選課目的不明確，開課與選課的過(guò)程中均存在功利性強(qiáng)和實(shí)用主義傾向，缺乏完善的公選課進(jìn)入退出機(jī)制等問(wèn)題。這些問(wèn)題在一定程度上制約了大學(xué)公共選修課的質(zhì)量，削弱了公共選修課在培養(yǎng)人才方面的作用。 第四章探討了大學(xué)公共選修課程質(zhì)量保證的實(shí)現(xiàn)途徑。筆者以全面質(zhì)量管理的理念作為指導(dǎo)，從影響公共選修課質(zhì)量的輸入保證、過(guò)程保證和輸出保證的關(guān)鍵因子作為討論的角度，構(gòu)建了對(duì)公共選修課質(zhì)量影響重大的內(nèi)部質(zhì)量保證體系，具有較強(qiáng)的可操作性和一定的理論意義。
[Abstract]:With the deepening of the reform of higher education management system, the autonomy of running a university has been gradually implemented. Many universities in order to strengthen the cultivation of cultural quality of college students. Broaden students' fields of knowledge and set up public elective courses for students to create more initiative, independent learning opportunities. It should be said that public elective courses have achieved certain results and educational results. But in each university. However, the opening of public elective courses is mixed, some can be filled, but some are open, public elective courses in the course of implementation gradually exposed a lot of problems. The quality of public elective courses is not optimistic. The fundamental reason lies in the lack of sufficient theoretical support for the opening of public elective courses in our country. In the process of implementation of public elective courses may appear in the lack of sufficient foresight and solutions, even public elective courses should be based on what kind of values as the guiding concept is not clear. The opening of public elective courses in our country lacks detailed top-down design. This research takes the higher education reform and internationalization as the background, through the research domestic and foreign university curriculum quality history, summarizes its existence question, analyzes its experience. This paper focuses on the value and goal pursuit of public elective courses in higher education. This paper puts forward that the value pursuit of university public elective courses is based on the integration of multiple values. Secondly, it reviews the development of university public elective courses, and on the basis of investigation and analysis, from the course opening. The implementation and management of the three aspects of the university public elective curriculum problems are reflected. Finally, in the discussion of the university public elective course quality assurance approach. The author focuses on the internal quality assurance construction of the university public elective courses, and puts forward the corresponding assurance strategies in the input, process and output stages. This paper is divided into four chapters: The first chapter introduces the reason and significance of the topic, the main research content and research methods, related literature review and the definition of related concepts. The second chapter focuses on the value pursuit and goal pursuit of the university public elective course. The value orientation of the university public elective course has both the instrumental value and the social value, as well as the value pursuit of paying attention to the national culture tradition. Return to the value pursuit of human activities and the value pursuit of promoting individual development. The value pursuit of public elective courses is the integration of multiple values. The goal pursuit of university public elective courses is mainly to promote students' knowledge and price. The perfection of value structure. The development of personality, ability and social responsibility. The third chapter is the reflection of public elective courses in universities in China. On the basis of literature research and investigation and analysis, the problems existing in the implementation of public elective courses, such as the small stock of public elective courses, are analyzed. In the whole university curriculum, the proportion is low, the opening of the course is arbitrary, the purpose of the students is not clear, and there are utilitarian and pragmatic tendencies in the course of the course and the course selection. These problems restrict the quality of public elective courses and weaken the role of public elective courses in training talents. Chapter 4th discusses the way to realize the quality assurance of public elective courses in universities. The author takes the concept of total quality management as the guidance, from the input assurance that affects the quality of public elective courses. Based on the key factors of process assurance and output assurance, the internal quality assurance system which has great influence on the quality of public elective courses is constructed, which has strong maneuverability and certain theoretical significance.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：中南民族大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2013
【分類號(hào)】：G642

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 陳向明;美國(guó)哈佛大學(xué)本科課程體系的四次改革浪潮[J];比較教育研究;1997年03期

2 周文軍,陸小平;深化公共選修課教學(xué)改革 全面推進(jìn)大學(xué)生素質(zhì)教育[J];常熟高專學(xué)報(bào);2002年06期

3 馬樹杉;高等教育大眾階段的教育質(zhì)量及其管理[J];常州工學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2001年03期

4 于明業(yè),李欣則;關(guān)于公共選修課的現(xiàn)狀與改革[J];大連大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào);2000年03期

5 陳紅英;全校公共選修課的改革與管理芻議[J];廣東工業(yè)大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2002年04期

6 古廣靈;;本科院校教學(xué)質(zhì)量保障體系的構(gòu)建與運(yùn)行探索[J];高教探索;2007年01期

7 黃偉力;;國(guó)內(nèi)外高校公共選修課的設(shè)置情況分析及對(duì)高校思想政治理論課配套選修課建設(shè)的啟示[J];高教探索;2007年04期

8 左崇良;劉愈;;中美研究型大學(xué)通識(shí)課程實(shí)踐的比較——以哈佛大學(xué)與北京大學(xué)為例[J];高等教育研究(成都);2007年03期

9 冷東;開設(shè)全校選修課的幾點(diǎn)體會(huì)[J];廣州大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2002年09期

10 唐艷蘭;大學(xué)課程保障體系構(gòu)建:“系統(tǒng)”的視角[J];黑龍江高教研究;2004年09期

相關(guān)博士學(xué)位論文 前1條

1 李世謳;教育碩士課程體系構(gòu)建研究[D];西南大學(xué);2010年

本文編號(hào)：1444386