【摘要】：隨著中央政府推行農(nóng)村學(xué)生營養(yǎng)改善政策,為農(nóng)村學(xué)生提供營養(yǎng)餐從民間慈善行為演變?yōu)檎袆?也引起了教育學(xué)界的興趣,成為當(dāng)今教育學(xué)領(lǐng)域?qū)W者關(guān)注的熱點之一。雖然國務(wù)院十四部委聯(lián)合下發(fā)了五個關(guān)于營養(yǎng)餐政策實行的配套文件,用于指導(dǎo)營養(yǎng)餐的供餐；但是其中對于營養(yǎng)餐的具體供餐模式介紹的較為簡略,國內(nèi)學(xué)者也較少涉及這個領(lǐng)域的研究。 鑒于以上分析,本文將研究的著力點定位于營養(yǎng)餐的供餐模式。文章第一部分為導(dǎo)論,主要介紹研究意義、研究緣起、研究成果綜述、研究方法和研究路徑,并且對相關(guān)概念做出了界定；第二部分介紹農(nóng)村學(xué)生營養(yǎng)改善政策出臺的政策背景和時代背景,指出雖然該項政策的出臺受到了民間“免費午餐”公益活動的積極影響,但是也有其必然性,該部分還對現(xiàn)階段該項政策做了簡要介紹。 在介紹了農(nóng)村營養(yǎng)餐政策的基本情況后,本文從第三部分開始具體介紹三種供餐模式,第三部分、第四部分、第五部分分別介紹學(xué)校模式、企業(yè)模式和家庭模式。學(xué)校供餐模式的優(yōu)點可以概括為政府主導(dǎo)、內(nèi)容豐富、易于推廣三個方面；但是同時正是基于其政府主導(dǎo)性,該模式又具有資金保障不足、規(guī)范過于籠統(tǒng)、人員管理困難的弊端。與學(xué)校模式相比,企業(yè)模式最大的區(qū)別在于企業(yè)是供餐的主體,所以它具有運營效率高、節(jié)約行政成本、節(jié)約時間成本的優(yōu)勢；但弊端同樣明顯,其一企業(yè)的逐利性可能會沖擊營養(yǎng)餐的公益色彩,其二、存在食品安全隱患,其三、食品營養(yǎng)單一,其四、受交通運輸條件制約較大。家庭供餐模式是一種與企業(yè)模式相似的模式,只不過其規(guī)模小、準(zhǔn)入條件低,所以它的優(yōu)點體現(xiàn)在操作簡便、成本低廉、可以最低保障三個方面;但是該模式的自身局限性使其弊端明顯,表現(xiàn)在食品安全隱患巨大、監(jiān)管困難、責(zé)任人確定困難三個方面。 面對三種模式的優(yōu)缺點,本文的第六部分總結(jié)了它們的啟示,就是要堅持以學(xué)校模式為主體,以公益為核心,以效率為目標(biāo)。同時,對于三種供餐模式的弊端必須重視,要通過健全法律法規(guī)體系、加大保障資金投入力度、加強領(lǐng)導(dǎo)完善監(jiān)管等多方面努力,使得三種供餐模式都能夠積極發(fā)揮作用。
[Abstract]:With the central government carrying out the policy of improving the nutrition of rural students, the provision of nutritious food for rural students has evolved from folk charitable behavior to government action, which has also aroused the interest of the educational circles and become one of the hot spots that scholars pay attention to in the field of pedagogy. Although the 14 ministries and commissions of the State Council jointly issued five supporting documents on the implementation of the nutritious meal policy, which were used to guide the feeding of the nutritious meal; However, the specific feeding model of nutritious meal is relatively simple, and the domestic scholars seldom involved in this field. In view of the above analysis, this paper focuses on the feeding model of nutritious meals. The first part of the article is an introduction, which mainly introduces the significance of the research, the origin of the research, the summary of the research results, the research methods and the research path, and defines the related concepts. The second part introduces the policy background and times background of rural students' nutrition improvement policy, and points out that although the policy is positively influenced by the "free lunch" public welfare activities, it has its inevitability. This part also makes a brief introduction to this policy at the present stage. After introducing the basic situation of the rural nutritious meal policy, this article introduces three kinds of feeding modes in detail from the third part, the fourth part, the fifth part respectively introduces the school pattern, the enterprise model and the family model. The advantages of school feeding model can be summarized as government-led, rich in content, easy to promote in three aspects; But at the same time, based on the guidance of the government, the model has the disadvantages of inadequate fund guarantee, too general norms and difficult personnel management. Compared with the school model, the biggest difference between the enterprise model and the school model is that the enterprise is the main body of catering, so it has the advantages of high operational efficiency, saving administrative cost and saving time cost; But the drawback is also obvious. One enterprise may impinge the commonweal color of the nutritious meal, the other is the hidden trouble of food safety, the third is the single food nutrition, and the fourth is restricted by the transportation conditions. Family feeding model is similar to the enterprise model, but its scale is small, access conditions are low, so its advantages are easy to operate, low cost, can be the lowest security in three aspects; However, the limitation of this model makes its disadvantages obvious, such as the huge hidden trouble of food safety, the difficulty of supervision and the difficulty of determining the responsible person. In the face of the advantages and disadvantages of the three models, the sixth part of this paper summarizes their enlightenment, that is, to adhere to the school model as the main body, public welfare as the core, efficiency as the goal. At the same time, we must pay attention to the malpractice of the three kinds of feeding modes. We should improve the system of laws and regulations, increase the investment of guarantee funds, strengthen the leadership and perfect the supervision and so on, so that the three modes of feeding can play an active role.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：華中師范大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2014
【分類號】：G521

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 馬明;;多視角下的教育公益性[J];國家教育行政學(xué)院學(xué)報;2006年01期

2 謝菲;;美國中小學(xué)營養(yǎng)午餐計劃對我國的啟示[J];管理工程師;2012年02期

3 勞凱聲;面臨挑戰(zhàn)的教育公益性[J];教育研究;2003年02期

4 李文;汪三貴;王Y，

本文編號：2385838