【摘要】：本研究采用問卷調(diào)查法，選取昆明市第二職業(yè)中專307名中職生作為研究對(duì)象，，以SCL-90和應(yīng)對(duì)方式量表為研究工具，研究不同應(yīng)對(duì)方式對(duì)中職生心理健康的影響。得出如下結(jié)果: 1.中職生在一般情境下的應(yīng)對(duì)方式頻率的使用依次是解決問題、求助、幻想、退避、合理化、自責(zé)。 2.中職生應(yīng)對(duì)方式在年級(jí)上存在顯著差異，主要表現(xiàn)為解決問題。高一年級(jí)比高二年級(jí)更多的使用解決問題的對(duì)方式；中職生應(yīng)對(duì)方式在性別上差異不顯著，但男生比女生更多使用解決問題、自責(zé)、退避、合理化的應(yīng)對(duì)方式。 3.中職生應(yīng)對(duì)方式在是否是班委上的差異主要表現(xiàn)為幻想和合理化。其他因子中，除了自責(zé)一個(gè)因子不存在差異，其余均存在差異。不是班委的學(xué)生比是班委的學(xué)生更多地使用幻想和合理化這兩種應(yīng)對(duì)方式。 4.中職生SCL-90的各因子得分及總分均高于國(guó)內(nèi)正常人常模，且差異極其顯著，排前三位的因子是強(qiáng)迫癥狀、敵對(duì)、人際關(guān)系敏感。在中職生群體中，男生總體心理健康水平要優(yōu)于女生。 5.中職生解決問題、求助兩種應(yīng)對(duì)方式和心理健康各因子及總均分為負(fù)相關(guān)外，其余均為正相關(guān)。多使用解決問題和求助的應(yīng)對(duì)方式，心理健康水平越高；多使用自責(zé)、幻想、合理化的應(yīng)對(duì)方式，心理健康水平越低。六種應(yīng)對(duì)方式中除了退避以外，都對(duì)心理健康水平有預(yù)測(cè)作用。其中，自責(zé)對(duì)心理健康水平的預(yù)測(cè)作用最強(qiáng)。
[Abstract]:In this study, 307 secondary vocational students in the second vocational secondary school in Kunming were investigated by questionnaire, and the effects of different coping styles on mental health of secondary vocational school students were studied with SCL-90 and coping style scale as the research tools. The results are as follows: 1. The frequency of coping style of secondary vocational students in general situation is problem solving, seeking help, fantasy, retreat, rationalization, self-accusation. 2. There are significant differences in coping styles of secondary vocational school students in grade, mainly for solving problems. The students of secondary vocational school had no significant difference in coping styles, but boys were more likely to use problem-solving, self-reproach, avoidance and rationalization than girls. 3. The difference between secondary vocational school students' coping style and class committee is mainly fantasy and rationalization. Among the other factors, there were no differences except for one factor of self-blame, but there were differences among the other factors. Students who are not committee members use fantasy and rationalization more than class committee students. 4. The scores and total scores of SCL-90 of secondary vocational school students were higher than that of normal people in China, and the difference was extremely significant. The top three factors were obsessive-compulsive symptoms, hostility and interpersonal sensitivity. In secondary vocational school students, the overall mental health level of male students is better than that of female students. 5. The secondary vocational students' problem solving, seeking help and mental health factors were negatively correlated, while the others were positively correlated. The higher the level of mental health is, and the lower the level of mental health is, the lower the level of mental health is if the coping style of self-accusation, fantasy and rationalization is used more frequently. All of the six coping styles have predictive effect on mental health except avoidance. Among them, self-blame has the strongest effect on predicting mental health level.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：云南師范大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2014
【分類號(hào)】：B844.2

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 張建衛(wèi),劉玉新,金盛華;大學(xué)生壓力與應(yīng)對(duì)方式特點(diǎn)的實(shí)證研究[J];北京理工大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2003年01期

2 姜偉國(guó);;當(dāng)前中職生盲目從眾的原因探析[J];承德民族師專學(xué)報(bào);2008年03期

3 劉麗;劉立娜;;單親高中生家庭環(huán)境與心理健康特點(diǎn)的研究[J];長(zhǎng)春大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào);2011年02期

4 邵華;;關(guān)于應(yīng)對(duì)的研究總結(jié)與展望[J];黑龍江教育(高教研究與評(píng)估);2012年01期

5 周韶俊;杭州地區(qū)職業(yè)高級(jí)中學(xué)學(xué)生心理健康狀況調(diào)查及對(duì)策研究[J];和田師范專科學(xué)校學(xué)報(bào);2005年03期

6 韓啟放;心理防御與心理健康[J];健康心理學(xué);1994年01期

7 蔣獎(jiǎng);父母教養(yǎng)方式與青少年行為問題關(guān)系的研究[J];健康心理學(xué)雜志;2004年01期

8 翟德春,潘秀丹 ,李慧英 ,任智梅 ,周旭松 ,朱巧玲;醫(yī)科大學(xué)生焦慮情緒的心理社會(huì)因素探討[J];中國(guó)健康心理學(xué)雜志;2005年02期

9 馬梁紅;藍(lán)瓊麗;田昕;駱桂秀;陳意曼;張小玲;農(nóng)超英;韋家成;;小學(xué)生心理健康與家庭環(huán)境相關(guān)性分析[J];中國(guó)健康心理學(xué)雜志;2007年09期

10 趙強(qiáng);;元認(rèn)知與心理健康標(biāo)準(zhǔn)的探析[J];中國(guó)健康心理學(xué)雜志;2009年11期

本文編號(hào)：2334854