本文選題：幼兒　切入點：父親教養(yǎng)行為　出處：《魯東大學(xué)》2014年碩士論文

【摘要】：本文首先對目前國內(nèi)外有關(guān)父親教養(yǎng)行為和父子依戀的研究進行了歸納和總結(jié)，梳理了父親教養(yǎng)行為和父子依戀的結(jié)構(gòu)、測量方法、研究歷史與研究現(xiàn)狀。在總結(jié)前人研究經(jīng)驗、訪談多位幼兒父親、頻繁入戶觀察兩個幼兒家庭的基礎(chǔ)上，自行編制了《幼兒父親教養(yǎng)行為問卷》，向200名幼兒父親發(fā)放了《幼兒父親教養(yǎng)行為問卷》進行試測，對收回的156份有效問卷進行了探索性因素分析，向120名幼兒父親發(fā)放了修改后的《幼兒父親教養(yǎng)行為問卷》，對收回的104份有效問卷進行了驗證性因素分析，最后對問卷進行了信效度檢驗并得到了包含22個題目的正式的《幼兒父親教養(yǎng)行為問卷》；依照同樣方法，，自行編制了《幼兒父子依戀行為問卷》，對155位幼兒父親發(fā)放了《幼兒父子依戀行為問卷》進行試測，對收回的143份有效問卷進行探索性因素分析，向120名幼兒父親發(fā)放了修改后的《幼兒父子依戀行為問卷》，對收回的95份有效問卷進行了驗證性因素分析，最后對問卷進行了信效度檢驗并得到了包含16個題目的正式的《幼兒父子依戀行為問卷》；最終向232位幼兒父親同時發(fā)放了兩份正式問卷，探討了兩者的特點與關(guān)系，并得出以下結(jié)論： 1、從敏感性、反應(yīng)性、控制性、情緒性四個維度編制的《幼兒父親教養(yǎng)行為問卷》和從親近性、焦慮性、撫慰性三個維度編制的《幼兒父子依戀行為問卷》有著較好的結(jié)構(gòu)與信效度，兩份問卷是可行的。 2、父親教養(yǎng)行為會因父母與幼兒年齡、父母的文化程度、家庭收入狀況的不同而存在差異，而不因幼兒性別、家庭結(jié)構(gòu)的不同而存在差異。 3、父子依戀會因父親的年齡、家庭收入和家庭結(jié)構(gòu)的不同而存在差異，而不因母親的年齡、幼兒的性別與年齡、父母文化程度的不同而存在差異。 4、在控制了父母與幼兒的年齡、父母文化程度、家庭收入與結(jié)構(gòu)這些因素的情況下，父親教養(yǎng)行為的各維度與父子依戀的各維度之間存在極其顯著的相關(guān)。其中，父親教養(yǎng)行為的控制性與父子依戀的親近性之間存在顯著的負相關(guān)，父親教養(yǎng)行為的敏感性、反應(yīng)性和情緒性與幼兒父子依戀的各個維度之間都存在極其顯著的正相關(guān)。 5、父親教養(yǎng)行為中的敏感性和情緒性對幼兒父子依戀的作用很大，它們能夠顯著正向預(yù)測父子依戀的親近性和撫慰性，父親教養(yǎng)行為中的敏感性能夠顯著正向預(yù)測父子依戀的焦慮性，而父親教養(yǎng)行為中的反應(yīng)性和控制性不能顯著預(yù)測父子依戀。
[Abstract]:In this paper, the current research on father rearing behavior and paternity attachment at home and abroad is summarized, and the structure and measurement methods of father rearing behavior and paternity attachment are analyzed. On the basis of summing up the previous research experience, interviewing many child fathers and observing the families of two young children frequently, The questionnaire of parenting behavior of infant fathers was compiled by ourselves, 200 fathers were given the questionnaire of parenting behavior of young children, and 156 valid questionnaires were analyzed by exploratory factor analysis. 120 child fathers were given the revised Child rearing behavior questionnaire, and 104 valid questionnaires were analyzed by confirmatory factor analysis. Finally, the reliability and validity of the questionnaire were tested and a formal questionnaire on parenting behavior of young fathers was obtained, which included 22 topics. The questionnaire of father-son attachment behavior was compiled, 155 fathers were given out the questionnaire of father-son attachment behavior, 143 valid questionnaires were analyzed by exploratory factor analysis. 120 child fathers were given out the revised "Child paternity attachment behavior questionnaire", and 95 valid questionnaires were analyzed by confirmatory factor analysis. Finally, the reliability and validity of the questionnaire were tested, and the formal questionnaire of father-son attachment behavior was obtained, which included 16 topics. Finally, two formal questionnaires were distributed to 232 fathers at the same time, and the characteristics and relationship of the two questionnaires were discussed. The following conclusions are drawn:. 1. The questionnaire was developed from four dimensions of sensitivity, reactivity, control and emotion, and from closeness and anxiety. The questionnaire of father-son attachment developed by three dimensions of comfort has good structure and reliability, and the two questionnaires are feasible. 2. The father's rearing behavior will be different according to the age of parents and children, the parents' education level, the family income, but not the children's sex and family structure. 3. The attachment of father and son will be different with the age of father, family income and family structure, but not with the age of mother, the sex and age of infant, and the educational level of parents. 4. In the case of controlling the age of parents and young children, parents' education level, family income and structure, there is a significant correlation between the dimensions of father's upbringing behavior and the dimensions of parent-son attachment. There is a significant negative correlation between the control of father's upbringing behavior and the closeness of paternity and son attachment. The sensitivity, reactivity and emotion of father's upbringing behavior have extremely significant positive correlation with each dimension of father-son attachment. 5. The sensitivity and emotion of father's rearing behavior have great effect on the attachment of father and son, and they can predict the closeness and comfort of father and son attachment. The sensitivity of father's upbringing behavior can predict the anxiety of father's and son's attachment positively, but the reactivity and control of father's rearing behavior can't predict father's son's attachment significantly.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：魯東大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2014
【分類號】：B844.12

【參考文獻】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 于海琴;親子依戀對兒童社會性發(fā)展影響的研究進展[J];華中科技大學(xué)學(xué)報(人文社會科學(xué)版);2002年01期

2 王志梅;初中生父母教養(yǎng)方式影響因素的研究[J];教育理論與實踐;2005年18期

3 鈕勝芳;;父親教養(yǎng)方式的影響因素分析及其與兒童自我概念的相關(guān)研究[J];貴州師范大學(xué)學(xué)報(自然科學(xué)版);2011年02期

4 周素珍;;學(xué)前兒童父親教養(yǎng)行為研究綜述[J];前沿;2007年03期

5 晏紅;父母對兒童性別偏愛的差異之研究[J];天津市教科院學(xué)報;2003年03期

6 紀(jì)成雙;;父親不能淡出家庭教育[J];現(xiàn)代家教;2000年08期

7 鄔佩霞,陶沙,曾琦,王耘,董奇;2～6歲兒童的氣質(zhì)特點與母親撫養(yǎng)困難的關(guān)系[J];心理發(fā)展與教育;1997年03期

8 劉金花;家庭研究新觀點述評[J];心理科學(xué);1996年01期

9 許巖;;父親參與兒童教養(yǎng)影響因素研究述評[J];煙臺師范學(xué)院學(xué)報(哲學(xué)社會科學(xué)版);2006年01期

10 王茜;陳會昌;;父母教養(yǎng)行為在兒童2歲和7歲時的差異及與兒童抑制性的關(guān)系[J];中國心理衛(wèi)生雜志;2007年09期

本文編號：1700553