本文選題：禁止擇校 + 合法性��； 參考：《遼寧師范大學(xué)》2012年博士論文

【摘要】：我國(guó)義務(wù)教育自清末1904年發(fā)軔至今已經(jīng)有一個(gè)多世紀(jì)的時(shí)間。在長(zhǎng)達(dá)一個(gè)多世紀(jì)的時(shí)間里，受到戰(zhàn)爭(zhēng)、生產(chǎn)力水平、社會(huì)轉(zhuǎn)型、教育思潮等眾多因素的影響，義務(wù)教育的發(fā)展經(jīng)歷了從無(wú)到有，從徘徊停滯到厲行推展的曲折歷程。當(dāng)前，我國(guó)義務(wù)教育已獲得卓越的成績(jī)，城鄉(xiāng)免費(fèi)義務(wù)教育全面實(shí)現(xiàn)，普及率、入學(xué)率、師資水平、辦學(xué)條件等方面都有顯著改善，已經(jīng)進(jìn)入以促進(jìn)公平為重點(diǎn)，以提高質(zhì)量為核心，，全面實(shí)施素質(zhì)教育的新階段。在取得成績(jī)的同時(shí)，義務(wù)教育也日漸暴露出一些問題，這些問題在不同程度上影響阻礙了義務(wù)教育的發(fā)展，其中“擇校”問題作為長(zhǎng)期存在、久治未愈、危害較多的難點(diǎn)問題日漸突顯出來(lái)。為治理“擇校”問題，從1995年至今，中央和地方政府頒布了大量“禁止擇校政策”，禁止招收擇校生、禁止擇校亂收費(fèi)，禁止舉辦升學(xué)培訓(xùn)班等等，然而經(jīng)過(guò)長(zhǎng)期的政策治理后，“擇校”問題非但沒有解決，反而愈演愈烈，成為義務(wù)教育階段最難解的問題之一。更為嚴(yán)重的是，一系列“禁止擇校政策”還衍生了新的問題，比如教育尋租問題、“占坑班”問題等。基于此，我們不禁對(duì)“禁止擇校政策”本身產(chǎn)生了質(zhì)疑，“禁止擇校政策”是一種最優(yōu)的政策選擇么，“禁止擇校政策”具有科學(xué)有效性么，“禁止擇校政策”具有合法性、合理性么，我們應(yīng)該依據(jù)怎樣的原則制定解決“擇�！眴栴}的政策？為解決這些問題，本文主要開展以下幾個(gè)部分的研究： 第一部分主要闡述本文的研究背景、研究目的、研究意義，對(duì)已有研究進(jìn)行綜述，界定主要概念，提出研究思路和研究?jī)?nèi)容。 第二部分重點(diǎn)梳理近十余年中央和地方政府頒布的一系列“禁止擇校政策”，分析得出中央和地方政府頒布的“禁止擇校政策”的主要特征，同時(shí)指出中央和地方政府“禁止擇校政策”在實(shí)施中存在的問題。 第三部分對(duì)“禁止擇校政策”進(jìn)行合法性分析，以意識(shí)形態(tài)、政府運(yùn)行機(jī)制、法律法規(guī)、公眾教育需要等四部分內(nèi)容構(gòu)建“禁止擇校政策”合法性分析的框架體系，并據(jù)此對(duì)“禁止擇校政策”是否具有合法性進(jìn)行判斷。 第四部分對(duì)“禁止擇校政策”進(jìn)行合理性分析，以對(duì)義務(wù)教育的內(nèi)在規(guī)定性和義務(wù)教育政策應(yīng)然功能的規(guī)律性認(rèn)識(shí)為基礎(chǔ)構(gòu)建“禁止擇校政策”合理性的判斷標(biāo)準(zhǔn)，并據(jù)此對(duì)“禁止擇校政策”是否具有合理性進(jìn)行分析。 第五部分首先對(duì)“禁止擇校政策”實(shí)施有效性進(jìn)行分析，認(rèn)為要提高解決“擇�！眴栴}政策的有效性，必須依據(jù)一些基本原則來(lái)制定政策，這些基本原則包括保證政策具有合法性的原則和保證政策具有合理性的原則。另外本文還提出應(yīng)從多個(gè)方面改革和完善政策的運(yùn)行環(huán)境。
[Abstract]:There has been more than a century since the beginning of compulsory education in China in late Qing Dynasty and 1904. For more than a century, the development of compulsory education has experienced a tortuous course from scratch, from stagnation to vigorous development, under the influence of many factors, such as war, productivity level, social transformation, educational trend and so on. At present, China's compulsory education has achieved remarkable results. The comprehensive realization of free compulsory education in urban and rural areas, the popularization rate, the school enrolment rate, the level of teachers, the conditions for running schools, and so on, have all improved significantly, and they have entered the focus on promoting equity. To improve quality as the core, comprehensive implementation of the new stage of quality education. At the same time, there are also some problems in compulsory education, which affect the development of compulsory education to some extent. Among them, the problem of "choosing school" exists for a long time and has not been cured for a long time. The more harmful difficult problems are becoming more and more prominent. In order to deal with the problem of "school selection", from 1995 to now, the central and local governments have promulgated a large number of "prohibited school selection policies," prohibiting the recruitment of school selection students, prohibiting arbitrary fees for school selection, and prohibiting the holding of further studies and training courses, and so on. However, after a long period of policy management, the problem of "choosing schools" has not been solved, but has become more and more serious, and has become one of the most difficult problems in compulsory education. What's more, a series of "forbidden school policy" has spawned new problems, such as education rent-seeking problem, "occupation class" problem and so on. Based on this, we can not help questioning the policy itself. Is the policy of banning school selection the best policy choice, is the policy of banning school selection scientific and effective, and the policy of banning school selection has the legitimacy? Is it reasonable, what principles should we base on to solve the problem of "school selection" policy? In order to solve these problems, this paper mainly carries out the following parts of the research: The first part mainly describes the research background, purpose and significance of this paper, summarizes the existing research, defines the main concepts, and puts forward the research ideas and research content. The second part focuses on combing a series of "forbidden school selection policies" promulgated by the central and local governments in the past ten years, and analyzes the main characteristics of the "forbidden school selection policies" promulgated by the central and local governments. At the same time, it points out the problems existing in the implementation of the "forbidden school selection policy" of the central and local governments. The third part analyzes the legality of the "forbidden school policy", and constructs the framework system of "forbidden school policy" legitimacy analysis by ideology, government operating mechanism, laws and regulations, public education needs, etc. On the basis of this, we judge the legality of the forbidden school policy. In the fourth part, we analyze the rationality of the "forbidden school policy", and construct the judgment standard of the rationality of "forbidden school policy" based on the understanding of the inherent rules of compulsory education and the regularity of the function of compulsory education policy. On the basis of this, the article analyzes whether the policy of banning school selection is reasonable. In the fifth part, the author analyzes the effectiveness of the "No School Choice Policy", and thinks that in order to improve the effectiveness of the policy, we must make the policy according to some basic principles. These basic principles include the principle of the legitimacy of the policy and the principle of the rationality of the policy. In addition, this paper also puts forward that we should reform and perfect the operating environment of the policy from many aspects.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：遼寧師范大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：博士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2012
【分類號(hào)】：G522.3

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 張國(guó)慶;論理性主義公共政策分析的局限性[J];北京大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(哲學(xué)社會(huì)科學(xué)版);1997年04期

2 閻光才;教育的功能、功用到功效──20世紀(jì)西方公共教育政策價(jià)值取向的演進(jìn)邏輯[J];比較教育研究;2002年03期

3 朱家存;從限制到鼓勵(lì):國(guó)外擇校政策透視[J];比較教育研究;2003年12期

4 榮黎霞;;發(fā)展中國(guó)家如何致力于更加公平的教育——以印度和南非為例[J];比較教育研究;2007年02期

5 皮擁軍;;OECD國(guó)家推進(jìn)教育公平的典范——韓國(guó)和芬蘭[J];比較教育研究;2007年02期

6 ;借鑒國(guó)外經(jīng)驗(yàn),創(chuàng)建中國(guó)的“擇校教育券”制度[J];比較教育研究;2007年08期

7 董輝;盧乃桂;;國(guó)外擇校研究的前沿圖景:現(xiàn)象與政策[J];比較教育研究;2010年12期

8 曾曉東;;“擇�！睂�(duì)義務(wù)教育制度的挑戰(zhàn)及發(fā)達(dá)國(guó)家實(shí)踐中的“變革”[J];比較教育研究;2010年12期

9 劉智運(yùn),胡德海;對(duì)教育本質(zhì)的再認(rèn)識(shí)[J];北京大學(xué)教育評(píng)論;2004年04期

10 文東茅;;我國(guó)城市義務(wù)教育階段的擇校及其對(duì)弱勢(shì)群體的影響[J];北京大學(xué)教育評(píng)論;2006年02期

相關(guān)重要報(bào)紙文章 前2條

1 曾德明邋李玉婷;[N];人民政協(xié)報(bào);2007年

2 本報(bào)記者 車輝;[N];工人日?qǐng)?bào);2011年

相關(guān)博士學(xué)位論文 前4條

1 顏佳華;當(dāng)代中國(guó)社會(huì)轉(zhuǎn)型期政府權(quán)力運(yùn)行機(jī)制重塑研究[D];華東師范大學(xué);2004年

2 趙爽;教育政策合法性研究[D];東北師范大學(xué);2005年

3 李軍;我國(guó)義務(wù)教育階段就近入學(xué)政策分析[D];華東師范大學(xué);2007年

4 謝金林;公共政策的倫理基礎(chǔ)研究[D];中南大學(xué);2007年

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前1條

1 陶玫娜;重慶市大渡口區(qū)義務(wù)教育階段擇校現(xiàn)狀與對(duì)策的研究[D];重慶大學(xué);2007年

本文編號(hào)：1884588