本文選題：中庸實踐思維 + 家庭功能　； 參考：《中南大學》2012年博士論文

【摘要】：目的： 1、在家庭成員父母樣本和青少年子女樣本中進行中庸行為自評量表和中庸價值量表的信效度檢驗。 2、探索中庸實踐思維對家庭功能和心理健康的影響及影響路徑。 方法： 1、以方便抽樣的方式,抽取湖南省長沙市248名成年人和248青少年,對條目進行前期試測。隨后分別再抽取278名成年人和青少年,采用主成分分析法對量表進行探索性因素分析。最后抽取401戶家庭成員,其中780名父母和401名青少年子女對量表進行信效度檢驗。8周后,其中150名參加重測。信度采用Cronbach's α系數(shù)、條目與分量表相關(guān)和重測信度。驗證性因素分析與分量表的相關(guān)檢驗結(jié)構(gòu)效度。 2、采用相關(guān)分析、聚類分析、多元方差分析、線性回歸分析的統(tǒng)計方法研究中庸實踐思維對家庭功能和心理健康的影響,用LISEREL8.7軟件建構(gòu)中庸實踐思維中介模型。 結(jié)果： 1、中庸量表信效度(1)修訂后的中庸行為自評量表,進行探索性因素分析,提取四個因子累積解釋率分別為63.07%。在成人樣本中量表Cronbach's α系數(shù)為.713,各因子α系數(shù)在.710-.752之間；重測信度為0.687；條目與相應的因子作相關(guān)系數(shù)在0.47到0.76之間。青少年樣本中量表Cronbach's α系數(shù)為.682,各因子α系數(shù)在.611-.689之間；重測信度為0.671；條目與相應的因子作相關(guān)系數(shù)在0.40到0.79之間。驗證性因子分析的指標均達到測量學要求。(2)對中庸價值量表進行探索性因素分析,提取兩個因子累積解釋率為43.07%。中庸價值量表在成人樣本中量表Cronbach's α系數(shù)為.723,各因子α系數(shù)在.621-.684之間；重測信度為0.722；條目與相應的因子作相關(guān)系數(shù)在0.48到0.54之間。青少年樣本中量表Cronbach's α系數(shù)為.727,各因子α系數(shù)在.633-.639之間；重測信度為0.595；條目與相應的因子作相關(guān)系數(shù)在0.46到0.65之間。驗證性因子分析的指標均達到測量學要求。 2、中庸實踐思維對家庭功能和心理健康的影響：(1)中庸行為和中庸價值均與家庭功能和心理健康呈顯著性相關(guān)(P0.01)。(2)中庸價值的中庸核心和自我收斂因子是家庭功能與心理健康的中介變量。中庸行為自評的負面中庸和克己因子是家庭功能與心理健康的中介變量。(3)中庸行為是中庸價值與家庭功能的中介變量。 結(jié)論： 1、中庸價值量表和修訂后的中庸行為自評量表有較好信效度。 2、中庸實踐思維正向影響家庭功能和心理健康。中庸實踐思維在家庭功能與心理健康關(guān)系中具有中介效應。
[Abstract]:Objective: 1. The reliability and validity of the mean behavior Self-Rating scale and the mean value scale were tested in the parents' sample of family members and the sample of adolescent's children. 2. To explore the influence and path of mediocre practical thinking on family function and mental health. Methods: 1. 248 adults and 248 adolescents in Changsha, Hunan province were sampled by convenient sampling. Then 278 adults and adolescents were selected, and principal component analysis (PCA) was used to analyze the factors of the scale. Finally, 401 family members were selected, of whom 780 parents and 401 adolescent children were tested for reliability and validity of the scale for 8 weeks, of which 150 took part in the retest. The reliability was based on Cronbach's 偽 coefficient, item and subscale correlation and retest reliability. Confirmatory factor analysis and the correlation test of the component table are used to verify the structural validity. 2. Correlation analysis, cluster analysis, multivariate variance analysis and linear regression analysis were used to study the influence of mean practical thinking on family function and mental health, and LISEREL8.7 software was used to construct the mediating model of mean practical thinking. Results: 1. The reliability and validity of the mean scale were revised, and the exploratory factor analysis was carried out. The cumulative interpretation rate of the four factors was 63.07. In adult samples, the Cronbach's 偽 coefficient of the scale was .713, the 偽 coefficient of each factor was between .710-.752, the test-retest reliability was 0.687, and the correlation coefficient between the items and the corresponding factors was between 0.47 and 0.76. The Cronbach's 偽 coefficient of the scale was .682, the 偽 coefficient of each factor was between .611-.689, the test-retest reliability was 0.671, and the correlation coefficient between the items and the corresponding factors was between 0.40 and 0.79. The indexes of confirmatory factor analysis were all up to the requirement of measurement. (2) the exploratory factor analysis of the mean value scale was carried out, and the cumulative interpretation rate of the two factors was 43.07. The mean value scale in adult samples had a Cronbach's 偽 coefficient of .723, a coefficient of between .621-.684, a test-retest reliability of 0.722, and a correlation coefficient of 0.48 to 0.54. The Cronbach's 偽 coefficient of the scale was .727, the 偽 coefficient of each factor was between .633-.639, the test-retest reliability was 0.595, and the correlation coefficient between the items and the corresponding factors was 0.46 to 0.65. The index of confirmatory factor analysis is up to the requirement of measurement. (2) the influence of practical thinking of the mean on Family function and Mental Health: (1) mean behavior and mean value are significantly related to family function and mental health. The intermediary variable of mental health. The negative mediating factor of self-evaluation of mean behavior is the intermediary variable of family function and mental health. (3) mean behavior is the intermediary variable of mean value and family function. Conclusion: 1. The mean value scale and the revised mean behavior scale have good reliability and validity. 2. The practical thinking of the mean positively affects family function and mental health. Mediating practical thinking plays an intermediary role in the relationship between family function and mental health.
【學位授予單位】：中南大學
【學位級別】：博士
【學位授予年份】：2012
【分類號】：B844.2

【參考文獻】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 沈怡芳,張曉莉;大學生應對方式與家庭功能的關(guān)系[J];安徽衛(wèi)生職業(yè)技術(shù)學院學報;2003年05期

2 金盛華,辛志勇;中國人價值觀研究的現(xiàn)狀及發(fā)展趨勢[J];北京師范大學學報(社會科學版);2003年03期

3 蔡忠建;;對描述性統(tǒng)計量的偏度和峰度應用的研究[J];北京體育大學學報;2009年03期

4 呂繁，顧nr;家庭APGAR問卷及其臨床應用[J];國外醫(yī)學(醫(yī)院管理分冊);1995年02期

5 李曉芳,楊淑紅,王敏娜;單親家庭子女個性特征和行為問題對照研究[J];中國健康心理學雜志;2005年05期

6 郭侃;曾維希;;大學生中庸思維在情緒調(diào)節(jié)和情緒間的作用[J];中國健康心理學雜志;2012年07期

7 田廣清;中庸:實現(xiàn)社會和諧的正確思想方法[J];孔子研究;2000年03期

8 邢強;性別形成和差異的社會認知理論述評[J];南京師大學報(社會科學版);2002年02期

9 徐京華;;人腦功能的混沌動力學[J];科學;1990年04期

10 易法建;家庭功能與大學生社會化的研究[J];青年研究;1998年06期

，

本文編號：1781567