【摘要】：教育為國家的發(fā)展和進(jìn)步提供動(dòng)力,教師是教育實(shí)踐中的主要實(shí)施者。近幾年國家相繼出臺(tái)了關(guān)于提升教師能力的相關(guān)文件和政策。課堂教學(xué)能力是教師所應(yīng)具有的所有能力中的重要組成。本研究第一部分對(duì)整體的背景進(jìn)行了研究,第一點(diǎn)來自于政策的推進(jìn);第二點(diǎn)來自于教師能力研討的展開;第三點(diǎn)來自于物理學(xué)科本身的特點(diǎn)。以上角度作為研究的基點(diǎn)對(duì)研究進(jìn)行展開。第二部分主要是確立了本研究的核心概念,通過文獻(xiàn)梳理建立評(píng)價(jià)指標(biāo)系統(tǒng),同時(shí)為保證本研究的科學(xué)性,筆者走訪了相關(guān)專家,對(duì)評(píng)價(jià)指標(biāo)的幾個(gè)維度劃分進(jìn)行了意見收集。根據(jù)專家們的意見筆者對(duì)評(píng)價(jià)指標(biāo)進(jìn)行了修改,根據(jù)修改意見重新修正了指標(biāo)。最后將修改后的指標(biāo)體再次反饋給各位專家。專家對(duì)每一條目進(jìn)行了打分。經(jīng)過梳理和專家打分情況筆者利用專家排序法統(tǒng)計(jì)了指標(biāo)權(quán)重。本研究的第三部分根據(jù)指標(biāo)的權(quán)重的分配確立了初步的調(diào)查問卷,對(duì)課堂實(shí)驗(yàn)?zāi)芰@一權(quán)重值大的指標(biāo)在題量上有所側(cè)重。并對(duì)問卷進(jìn)行了40名師范生小范圍的測量。根據(jù)初步測量的結(jié)果對(duì)問卷進(jìn)行了修正,同時(shí)筆者對(duì)初測問卷進(jìn)行了信度和效度的檢驗(yàn)。檢驗(yàn)合格后形成最終的調(diào)查問卷。本研究的第四部分亦即論文的主體部分,發(fā)放最終形成的調(diào)查問卷并對(duì)120名物理師范生進(jìn)行調(diào)查,專家回訪的問卷信度和效度較之第一次均有明顯提升。筆者對(duì)調(diào)查結(jié)果進(jìn)行統(tǒng)計(jì)分析和影響因素的分析。根據(jù)數(shù)據(jù)反映的結(jié)果得出了每項(xiàng)一級(jí)指標(biāo)目前的現(xiàn)狀,總結(jié)了物理師范生現(xiàn)有的優(yōu)勢(shì)和欠缺。以上工作之后,從師范生自身的角度、學(xué)校培養(yǎng)的角度、各項(xiàng)指標(biāo)的現(xiàn)狀角度總結(jié)了研究的結(jié)論。在師范生自身方面,建議增強(qiáng)能力提升的意識(shí),充分發(fā)揮現(xiàn)有的優(yōu)勢(shì);學(xué)校培養(yǎng)方面,提出適當(dāng)延長實(shí)習(xí)時(shí)間的建議。就五項(xiàng)一級(jí)指標(biāo)對(duì)應(yīng)能力分析了優(yōu)勢(shì)和不足。對(duì)每項(xiàng)能力不足之處給出了提升策略。最后筆者對(duì)本次研究的不足和所遇到的問題進(jìn)行反思。旨在今后的學(xué)習(xí)和研究中改進(jìn)和提升。
[Abstract]:Education provides the motive force for the development and progress of the country, and teachers are the main implementers in the educational practice. In recent years, the country has issued the relevant documents and policies on improving teachers' ability. Classroom teaching ability is an important component of all abilities teachers should have. The first part of this study studies the whole background, the first point comes from the promotion of policy; the second part comes from the development of teacher ability research; the third part comes from the characteristics of physics discipline itself. The above angle is used as the basic point of the research. The second part mainly establishes the core concept of this study, establishes the evaluation index system through the literature combing, at the same time, in order to ensure the scientific nature of this research, the author visits the relevant experts, and carries on the opinion collection to several dimensions division of the evaluation index. According to the opinions of the experts, the author modifies the evaluation index and revises the index according to the revised opinion. Finally, the revised index body will be feedback to the experts again. The experts rated each entry. After combing and expert scoring the author uses the expert ranking method to calculate the index weight. The third part of this study establishes a preliminary questionnaire according to the distribution of the weight of the indicators, focusing on the classroom experiment ability, which has a large weight. The questionnaire was used to measure 40 normal students in a small range. According to the results of preliminary measurement, the questionnaire was revised, and the reliability and validity of the initial questionnaire were tested. The final questionnaire is formed after passing the test. The fourth part of this study is the main part of the paper, which distributes the final questionnaire and investigates 120 physics normal students. The reliability and validity of the questionnaire returned by the experts are significantly improved compared with the first time. The author carries on the statistical analysis and the influence factor analysis to the investigation result. According to the results of the data, the present situation of each primary index is obtained, and the advantages and disadvantages of physics normal students are summarized. After the above work, the conclusion of the research is summarized from the point of view of normal students themselves, the angle of school cultivation and the present situation of each index. In the aspect of normal school students themselves, it is suggested to enhance the awareness of ability promotion and give full play to the existing advantages, while in the aspect of school training, some suggestions are put forward to extend the practice time appropriately. This paper analyzes the advantages and disadvantages of the corresponding ability of the five primary indicators. The improvement strategy is given for each ability deficiency. Finally, the author reflects on the shortcomings and problems of this study. The aim is to improve and improve the future study and research.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：沈陽師范大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2017
【分類號(hào)】：G652;O4-4

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 姚計(jì)海;王喜雪;;近十年來我國教育研究方法的分析與反思[J];教育研究;2013年03期

2 王麗珍;林海;馬存根;胡衛(wèi)平;;近三十年我國教師能力的研究狀況與趨勢(shì)分析[J];教育理論與實(shí)踐;2012年10期

3 楊帆;穆肅;;終身學(xué)習(xí)能力構(gòu)成及能力項(xiàng)關(guān)系的研究[J];開放教育研究;2011年03期

4 楊維東;賈楠;;建構(gòu)主義學(xué)習(xí)理論述評(píng)[J];理論導(dǎo)刊;2011年05期

5 ;關(guān)于印發(fā)《師范教育司2011年工作要點(diǎn)》的通知[J];中小學(xué)教師培訓(xùn);2011年03期

6 張延華;;艾利斯ABC理論的應(yīng)用及對(duì)大學(xué)生教育的啟示[J];浙江青年專修學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2010年03期

7 王沛;關(guān)文軍;王陽;;中小學(xué)教師教育教學(xué)能力的內(nèi)涵與結(jié)構(gòu)[J];課程·教材·教法;2010年06期

8 顧明遠(yuǎn);;終身學(xué)習(xí)與人的全面發(fā)展[J];北京師范大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2008年06期

9 張學(xué)民;申繼亮;林崇德;;小學(xué)教師課堂信息加工能力的研究[J];心理發(fā)展與教育;2007年01期

10 續(xù)潤華;閆梅紅;梁方;;終身教育理論及其對(duì)我國基礎(chǔ)教育課程與教學(xué)改革的影響[J];河南機(jī)電高等�？茖W(xué)校學(xué)報(bào);2006年01期

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前2條

1 黨帥;職前教師課堂教學(xué)能力培養(yǎng)研究[D];陜西師范大學(xué);2013年

2 馮曉麗;高師院校碩士研究生教學(xué)實(shí)踐能力的培養(yǎng)策略研究[D];曲阜師范大學(xué);2009年

，

本文編號(hào)：2281249