【摘要】：隨著大學治理的深入推進、學院規(guī)模的不斷增大,學院治理十分必要。學院治理是多元學院利益相關者在權(quán)力多中心分化的基礎上為了實現(xiàn)共同目標以民主、協(xié)商等方式協(xié)調(diào)彼此權(quán)力義務關系、配置學院資源的一系列過程。相較于傳統(tǒng)的教育行政管理,學院治理更有利于實現(xiàn)大學“基層變革”。在日益高漲的國家教育體制改革浪潮中,自2011年開始的國家試點學院改革在學生招錄與選拔、人才培養(yǎng)模式、教師遴選考核制度以及學院內(nèi)部治理結(jié)構(gòu)等四個方面做出了有益探索,但現(xiàn)實中存在的諸多問題使學院治理困難重重。學院管理行政化遏制了學院治理的民主化和多中心化進程,學術共同體的分裂消解了學院凝聚力和治理動力,學院治理的象征性更是以“偽治理”掩蓋了“真治理”的實際困窘。要變象征性治理為實質(zhì)性治理,就必須設法去除學院管理行政化、重構(gòu)學院學術共同體。目前無論在理論研究還是實踐操作領域,國外一流大學學院治理都具先進性。論文選取美國公立大學、英國公立大學和日本國立大學進行案例研究,著重分析這些國家學院治理結(jié)構(gòu)及其運行模式,以期為我國提供啟示和借鑒。為實現(xiàn)以學術為魂、以民主為體、以多中心為形的學院治理愿景,我們將再造理論與治理理論相結(jié)合,提出學院再造的理論模型和再造原則。學院再造的基本原則建立在治理的本質(zhì)之上,主要包括“兩類”,共“四點”內(nèi)容:第一類涉及學院外部治理,應遵循“掌舵與劃槳分離”和“權(quán)力與責任統(tǒng)一”原則;第二類涉及學院內(nèi)部治理,應遵循“多中心治理主體”和“多中心治理權(quán)力”的原則。在學院再造原則指導下,通過建立由教授等專業(yè)人士構(gòu)成的治理委員會進行共同治理是我國大學學院治理的基本方式和必然選擇。學院治理不是為了治理而治理,學院治理的最終目的在于建立現(xiàn)代學院制度。現(xiàn)代學院制度是學院治理制度化的產(chǎn)物,是具有創(chuàng)新慣性和持續(xù)改進能力的現(xiàn)代學院組織及運行體制。不管是學院治理還是現(xiàn)代學院制度,都以重振學術精神、促進大學治理體系和治理能力現(xiàn)代化為旨歸,都以建設世界一流大學和一流學科為目標。
[Abstract]:With the deepening of university governance, the scale of the college continues to grow, college governance is very necessary. College governance is a series of processes in which multiple college stakeholders, on the basis of multi-center differentiation of power, coordinate their power and obligation relations and allocate college resources in order to achieve the common goal, such as democracy, consultation and so on. Compared with the traditional educational administration, college governance is more conducive to the realization of the "grass-roots reform" of universities. In the rising tide of the reform of the national education system, the reform of the national pilot colleges began in 2011 in the recruitment and selection of students, talent training model, The system of teacher selection and appraisal and the internal governance structure of the college have made beneficial exploration, but in reality many problems exist in the management of the college. The administrative management of the college has restrained the process of democratization and multi-centralization of the governance of the college, and the division of the academic community has dispelled the cohesive force and the power of governance of the college. The symbolism of college governance is to cover up the actual embarrassment of "true governance" with "false governance". In order to change symbolic governance into substantive governance, we must try to remove the administration of college management and reconstruct the academic community. At present, whether in the field of theoretical research or practical operation, the governance of foreign first-class universities and colleges are advanced. This paper selects American public universities, British public universities and Japanese national universities as case studies, and analyzes the governance structure and operating mode of these national colleges in order to provide enlightenment and reference for our country. In order to realize the vision of academic governance, democracy and multi-center, we combine the theory of reengineering with the theory of governance, and put forward the theoretical model and principle of reengineering. The basic principles of college reengineering are based on the essence of governance, including "two types" and "four points" in total: the first kind involves the external governance of the college, which should follow the principles of "separation of steering and paddling" and "unity of power and responsibility"; The second kind involves the internal governance of the college, and should follow the principles of "the main body of polycentric governance" and "the power of polycentric governance". Under the guidance of the principle of college reengineering, it is the basic way and inevitable choice of college governance in our country to establish a governance committee composed of professors and other professionals. College governance is not governance for the sake of governance, the ultimate goal of college governance is to establish a modern college system. The modern college system is the product of the institutionalization of college governance, and it is a modern college organization and operation system with the ability of innovation and continuous improvement. The aim of college governance and modern college system is to reinvigorate academic spirit, to promote the modernization of university governance system and governance ability, and to build world-class universities and disciplines.
【學位授予單位】：南京師范大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2017
【分類號】：G647

【參考文獻】

相關期刊論文 前10條

1 陳廷柱;;院系治理改革的路徑選擇及其系統(tǒng)化策略[J];中國高教研究;2017年01期

2 王建華;;學院的性質(zhì)及其治理[J];中國高教研究;2017年01期

3 吳康寧;;世界一流大學建設應當放眼世界[J];探索與爭鳴;2016年07期

4 宣勇;;論大學的校院關系與二級學院治理[J];現(xiàn)代教育管理;2016年07期

5 劉愛生;;世界一流大學人才培養(yǎng)、教師發(fā)展與院長職責——斯坦福大學教育學院院長施瓦茲·單訪談錄[J];高校教育管理;2016年04期

6 潘懋元;左崇良;;高等教育治理的規(guī)約機制[J];吉首大學學報(社會科學版);2016年03期

7 馮景波;史萬兵;;美國州立大學內(nèi)部治理結(jié)構(gòu)的哲學分析[J];國家教育行政學院學報;2016年01期

8 甘暉;;基于大學治理能力現(xiàn)代化的大學治理體系構(gòu)建[J];高等教育研究;2015年07期

9 羅仲尤;劉櫻;;美國公立大學教師薪酬制度的特點與啟示——以加州大學為例[J];大學教育科學;2015年04期

10 陳運超;;大學治理之痛與治[J];復旦教育論壇;2015年03期

相關重要報紙文章 前2條

1 石中英;;大學辦學院還是“學院辦大學”[N];光明日報;2016年

2 羅伯特·J·薩繆爾森;;“管理資本主義”的末期[N];第一財經(jīng)日報;2006年

相關博士學位論文 前2條

1 劉恩允;治理理論視閾下的我國大學院系治理研究[D];蘇州大學;2014年

2 劉香菊;治理視域下的我國大學院長角色研究[D];華中科技大學;2014年

相關碩士學位論文 前1條

1 張良玉;試點學院改革研究[D];蘭州大學;2014年

，

本文編號：2130921