本文選題：高考 + 高校招生�。� 參考：《華東師范大學(xué)》2017年碩士論文

【摘要】：由于高校招生長(zhǎng)期以高考成績(jī)作為錄取與否的主要標(biāo)準(zhǔn),使得高考和招生評(píng)價(jià)經(jīng)�；鞛橐徽劇ｋS著招生與考試相對(duì)分離,必須明確高考只是高校招生評(píng)價(jià)的要素之一,高考招生也只是高校招生的模式之一。高校招生評(píng)價(jià)上連高等教育、下引基礎(chǔ)教育,是教育體系中的重要環(huán)節(jié),具有核心樞紐的調(diào)節(jié)作用。一方面,它關(guān)乎高等教育人才培養(yǎng)的起點(diǎn);另一方面,又對(duì)基礎(chǔ)教育有著強(qiáng)大的引導(dǎo)效力。因此,是教育學(xué)研究中帶有全局性的重大問(wèn)題。值此恢復(fù)高考四十周年之際,本研究以普通本科高校招生評(píng)價(jià)模式為研究對(duì)象。首先,按照高考、保送生、自主招生、綜合評(píng)價(jià)四類招生模式為四條線索,回顧了 1977年以來(lái)我國(guó)高校招生評(píng)價(jià)的改革歷程,為定位當(dāng)前改革方向?qū)で筝^有深度的歷史參照。其次,通過(guò)介紹美、英、俄、日、韓、澳六國(guó)的高校招生評(píng)價(jià)模式,分析得出各國(guó)模式的共性與差異,為破解我國(guó)日漸凸顯的招生評(píng)價(jià)難題,獲取可資借鑒的域外經(jīng)驗(yàn)。進(jìn)而在功能辨析與功效比較的基礎(chǔ)上,思索高考、綜合評(píng)價(jià)兩大招生模式的協(xié)調(diào)策略。最后基于對(duì)高考改革中問(wèn)題和誤區(qū)的反思,探究進(jìn)一步改良高考招生模式的方法與對(duì)策。研究發(fā)現(xiàn),我國(guó)的高校招生評(píng)價(jià)肩負(fù)著育人功能、選拔功能和社會(huì)功能,高考招生和綜合評(píng)價(jià)招生在各項(xiàng)功效上互有優(yōu)劣。為了銜接好高等教育與基礎(chǔ)教育間的選拔與育人,兼顧教育功能與社會(huì)功能間的效率與公平。需要在堅(jiān)持高考招生模式為主的前提下,穩(wěn)步推廣綜合評(píng)價(jià)招生模式。就高考招生模式而言,以"兩依據(jù)、一參考"為導(dǎo)向的新一輪改革有其理想的出發(fā)點(diǎn),但也面臨招生錄取、高中教學(xué)、學(xué)生成長(zhǎng)中的一系列問(wèn)題。為解決這些問(wèn)題,完善高考方案,可以嘗試"合并高考學(xué)考,實(shí)行九科統(tǒng)考";"分?jǐn)?shù)多重表征,成績(jī)按需取用";"各科權(quán)重不一,分值因人而異"等改革新思路。
[Abstract]:College entrance examination and enrollment evaluation are often confused because of the long term performance of college entrance examination as the main criterion for admission or not.With the relative separation of enrollment and examination, it is necessary to make clear that the college entrance examination is only one of the elements of college enrollment evaluation, and the college entrance examination enrollment is only one of the models of college enrollment.It is an important link in the educational system to evaluate the enrollment of colleges and universities with higher education and basic education, which has the regulating function of the core pivot.On the one hand, it is related to the starting point of talent training in higher education; on the other hand, it has a strong guiding effect on basic education.Therefore, it is a major problem with overall significance in pedagogy research.On the occasion of the 40th anniversary of the restoration of the college entrance examination, this study focuses on the evaluation model of the enrollment of ordinary undergraduate colleges and universities.First of all, according to the college entrance examination, the guarantee student, the independent enrollment, the comprehensive evaluation four kinds of enrollment pattern is four clues, has reviewed our country university enrollment appraisal reform process since 1977, has sought the deeper historical reference for the localization current reform direction.Secondly, by introducing the college enrollment evaluation models of the United States, Britain, Russia, Japan, South Korea and Australia, the author analyzes the commonness and difference of the models of each country, in order to solve the increasingly prominent problems of enrollment evaluation in our country, and obtain the foreign experience that can be used for reference.Then, on the basis of function discrimination and efficiency comparison, the author thinks about college entrance examination and synthetically evaluates the coordination strategy of the two enrollment modes.Finally, based on the reflection of the problems and misunderstandings in the reform of the college entrance examination, the author explores the methods and countermeasures of further improving the enrollment mode of the college entrance examination.It is found that the evaluation of college enrollment in our country shoulders the functions of educating, selecting and social, and the college entrance examination and the comprehensive evaluation of enrollment have advantages and disadvantages.Under the premise of insisting on the college entrance examination enrollment model, the comprehensive evaluation enrollment model should be popularized steadily.As far as the college entrance examination enrollment model is concerned, the new round of reform guided by "two bases and one reference" has its ideal starting point, but it also faces a series of problems in enrollment, high school teaching and students' growth.In order to solve these problems and perfect the plan of college entrance examination, we can try to reform new ideas such as "combining the examination of college entrance examination and carrying out nine subjects unified examination", "the scores are represented many times, the results are used according to needs", and "the weight of each subject is different, the value of each subject is different from one person to another" and so on.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：華東師范大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2017
【分類號(hào)】：G647.32

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 王洪席;;我國(guó)綜合素質(zhì)評(píng)價(jià)政策的演進(jìn)歷程及特征分析——基于(1999—2014年)政策文本的分析[J];課程.教材.教法;2016年12期

2 劉云;李文英;;日本國(guó)立大學(xué)招生考試制度及其啟示[J];河北大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(哲學(xué)社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2016年06期

3 于婷;;英國(guó)高校招生考試制度探析[J];中國(guó)考試;2016年11期

4 宮春子;趙立銘;;數(shù)說(shuō)高考加分那些事[J];中國(guó)統(tǒng)計(jì);2016年10期

5 紀(jì)德奎;朱聰;;高考改革背景下“走班制”訴求與問(wèn)題反思[J];課程.教材.教法;2016年10期

6 李雄鷹;王穎;;日本大學(xué)入學(xué)考試中的綜合評(píng)價(jià)研究[J];當(dāng)代教育科學(xué);2016年18期

7 劉希偉;;新試點(diǎn)高考招生制度:價(jià)值、問(wèn)題及政策建議[J];教育發(fā)展研究;2016年10期

8 章亞駿;;從“組合”到“排列”——論高考科目改革的思維轉(zhuǎn)型[J];考試研究;2016年03期

9 王潤(rùn);周先進(jìn);;新高考改革背景下高中走班制機(jī)制構(gòu)建[J];當(dāng)代教育科學(xué);2016年06期

10 章建石;;一項(xiàng)公平與效率兼?zhèn)涞母呖几母餅槭裁措y以為繼?——標(biāo)準(zhǔn)分制度的變遷及其折射的治理困境[J];北京師范大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2016年01期

相關(guān)重要報(bào)紙文章 前1條

1 劉海峰;;統(tǒng)一高考無(wú)以取代 自主招生仍需探索[N];中國(guó)社會(huì)科學(xué)報(bào);2010年

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前3條

1 萬(wàn)世超;我國(guó)高校招生制度改革中的政府職能研究[D];西北大學(xué);2011年

2 劉玲;新課標(biāo)下中國(guó)高考制度的改革[D];吉林大學(xué);2011年

3 馬延朝;我國(guó)高考改革預(yù)期目標(biāo)實(shí)現(xiàn)及其偏離分析[D];湖南師范大學(xué);2010年

，

本文編號(hào)：1744203