本文關(guān)鍵詞：大學生科學探究能力評價研究　出處：《東南大學》2016年碩士論文　論文類型：學位論文

  更多相關(guān)文章： 大學生 科學探究能力評價 工作單 紙筆測試

【摘要】：從20世紀中后期開始,以美國為首的國家開始進行科學教育改革,各國政府及相關(guān)國際評價組織越來越重視對學生科學探究能力水平的評價。而通過前期閱讀相關(guān)文獻發(fā)現(xiàn),我國有關(guān)科學探究能力的研究對象大多數(shù)集中于中小學生,針對大學生科學探究能力的研究相對匱乏,并且評價方式單一。本研究選擇南京某重點高校及某普通高校大一學生,對其科學探究能力水平進行評價。本研究主要包括以下兩方面的內(nèi)容：(1)理論研究：對有關(guān)概念進行界定,介紹并分析了國內(nèi)外科學探究能力評價方式及評價體系,為研究提供了理論基礎(chǔ)。(2)實證研究：本研究的核心部分。本研究結(jié)合“基本要素分析法”,確定了科學的評價體系,有著明確的評價目標,并結(jié)合工作單及紙筆測試兩種評價方式,對南京地區(qū)兩所高校大學生的科學探究能力進行考察。根據(jù)研究發(fā)現(xiàn)：目前大學生具備了基本的探究能力；不同學生之間能力發(fā)展水平不同,兩種方式下：校際、高中分科、本科專業(yè)三個因素上差異均顯著,戶籍因素上差異均不顯著。性別因素在工作單方式下差異不顯著,紙筆測試方式下差異顯著；整體上看,工作單得分高于紙筆測試,兩種方式的結(jié)合使用可以很好地對大學生的科學探究能力進行評價。本研究針對發(fā)現(xiàn)的問題,從高校、教師與評價者、學生三方面提出了相應(yīng)的改進建議：高校要調(diào)整課程設(shè)置、加強各院系合作；教師要因材施教、鼓勵男女合作、加強師生互動；評價者采用合適評測體系科學評價；學生要對自身的科學探究能力水平有著清晰的了解,及時學習并掌握相關(guān)能力提升的方法。
[Abstract]:From the beginning in late twentieth Century, led by the United States government began the reform of science education, governments and relevant international organizations to evaluate more and more attention to the evaluation of the students' scientific inquiry ability. And through the early reading of related literature, the research object in our country on the scientific inquiry ability mainly focus on primary and secondary school students, according to the study of College Students' scientific inquiry the ability is relatively poor, and a single evaluation method. This research chooses Nanjing as a key university and a college freshman, to evaluate the abilities of science inquiry. This study mainly includes the following two aspects: (1) theoretical research: defines the related concepts, introduces and analyzes the domestic and foreign scientific inquiry ability evaluation methods and evaluation system, provides a theoretical basis for the study. (2) an empirical study: the core part of this study. This study combined " The factor analysis method, to determine the scientific evaluation system, a clear evaluation target, combined with the single and pen test two kinds of evaluation methods, to investigate two university students in Nanjing area of scientific inquiry ability. According to the findings of the research: at present, college students have the basic ability of inquiry; ability development among the students of different, in two ways: schools, high school division, undergraduate three factors were significant difference between household factors, the differences were not significant. The gender factor in a single way under different pen and paper test methods showed significant differences; overall, single scored higher than the pen test combining the two ways, can be very good on College Students' scientific inquiry ability evaluation. This study aimed at the problem of discovery, from universities, teachers and evaluation, put forward the corresponding improvement of students in three areas Suggestion: universities should adjust the curriculum, strengthen the cooperation of each department; teachers should teach students in accordance with their aptitude, to encourage cooperation between men and women, to strengthen teacher-student interaction; evaluation of the appropriate evaluation system of scientific evaluation; students of their abilities of science inquiry has a clear understanding, learning and mastering methods in improving the ability.

【學位授予單位】：東南大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2016
【分類號】：G642

【參考文獻】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前8條

1 夏小俊;顧乃景;柏毅;;TIMSS 2015與NAEP 2015科學評估框架的比較研究[J];考試研究;2016年01期

2 謝紹平;董秀紅;;國內(nèi)科學探究能力評價研究的現(xiàn)狀及展望[J];教學研究;2012年01期

3 鐘媚;;英國APU科學探究能力測評及其啟示[J];外國中小學教育;2010年11期

4 李雪梅;范春玲;;運用“探究日志”評價中學生的科學探究能力[J];物理教學探討;2008年07期

5 羅國忠;;基于紙筆測驗的科學探究能力評價的有效性研究[J];上海教育科研;2007年10期

6 羅國忠;;科學探究能力的評價方法[J];教育科學;2007年03期

7 黃t，

本文編號：1385856