【摘要】：本文主要論述了如何處理對(duì)外漢語(yǔ)課本編寫中的變調(diào)標(biāo)記符號(hào)問(wèn)題。無(wú)論是外國(guó)學(xué)者在漢語(yǔ)課本編寫中對(duì)“變調(diào)”標(biāo)記符號(hào)制訂與使用的歷史 ,還是中國(guó)學(xué)者在漢語(yǔ)語(yǔ)音研究中對(duì)“變調(diào)”標(biāo)記符號(hào)的制訂與使用的歷史 ,都表明不能以漢語(yǔ)語(yǔ)音“變調(diào)”研究代替對(duì)外漢語(yǔ)教學(xué)語(yǔ)音“變調(diào)”教學(xué)。本文還探討了對(duì)外漢語(yǔ)教學(xué)課本編寫中“變調(diào)”標(biāo)記符號(hào)的具體處理原則與方法。
[Abstract]:This paper mainly discusses how to deal with the problem of tone symbols in the compilation of textbooks for Chinese as a foreign language. Whether it is the history of the establishment and use of the "variant" mark symbols in the compilation of Chinese textbooks, or the history of the Chinese scholars' making and using of the "tone change" mark symbols in the study of Chinese phonology. All of them indicate that the study of tone change in Chinese pronunciation can not replace the teaching of tone change in teaching Chinese as a foreign language. This paper also discusses the principles and methods of "changing tone" mark symbols in the compilation of textbooks for teaching Chinese as a foreign language.
【作者單位】： 吉林大學(xué)古籍研究所 吉林大學(xué)國(guó)際交流學(xué)院
【分類號(hào)】：H195.3

【相似文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前1條

1 李無(wú)未,岳輝;對(duì)外漢語(yǔ)教學(xué)課本中的“變調(diào)”符號(hào)問(wèn)題[J];漢語(yǔ)學(xué)習(xí);2003年06期

，

本文編號(hào)：2245967