本文選題：ICP + 建筑國際比較��； 參考：《東北財(cái)經(jīng)大學(xué)》2013年碩士論文

【摘要】：ICP是一項(xiàng)全球性統(tǒng)計(jì)合作項(xiàng)目,主要目的是測算各種貨幣的購買力平價(jià)(PPP),以便以PPP為轉(zhuǎn)換系數(shù),將各國國內(nèi)生產(chǎn)總值(GDP)轉(zhuǎn)換為用統(tǒng)一貨幣單位表示的數(shù)據(jù),從而比較和評(píng)價(jià)各國的實(shí)際經(jīng)濟(jì)規(guī)模和結(jié)構(gòu)。ICP每5年舉行一次,目前為止該項(xiàng)目已經(jīng)完成七輪國際比較,2011年是全球第八輪ICP活動(dòng)的調(diào)查基準(zhǔn)年,自2011年1月起,全球170個(gè)國家和地區(qū)同時(shí)開展ICP調(diào)查,整個(gè)項(xiàng)目活動(dòng)預(yù)期會(huì)在2013年底結(jié)束。經(jīng)國務(wù)院批準(zhǔn),我國將首次全面參加新一輪ICP活動(dòng)。 本文基于第八輪國際比較大背景,對(duì)建筑業(yè)國際比較方法進(jìn)行研究。建筑業(yè)作為固定資產(chǎn)形成總額的一部分,其在國民生產(chǎn)總值中的比重是不容忽視的。在比較過程中,由于建筑業(yè)存在較強(qiáng)的地域性、民族性及結(jié)構(gòu)復(fù)雜性,使得其不能采用國際比較的通用方法,即建筑業(yè)必須采用特有的、專門性的國際比較方法進(jìn)行建筑國際比較,但也正是由于建筑業(yè)較強(qiáng)的地域性、民族性及結(jié)構(gòu)復(fù)雜性,使得建筑比較方法的研究異常困難,一直被視為國際比較的“頑疾”。目前,學(xué)術(shù)界對(duì)建筑國際比較方法的研究成果很有限。本文致力于該領(lǐng)域的研究,爭取為國際比較項(xiàng)目中建筑國際比較方法體系的完善添一份力。 本文共分為五個(gè)章節(jié)。 第一章為緒論。介紹本文的研究背景及意義,并總結(jié)國內(nèi)外研究成果,歸納并形成文獻(xiàn)綜述。 第二章為建筑國際比較常用方法研究。本章主要闡釋三種常使用的其他建筑國際比較方法：OECD-Eurostat方法、CIS方法、BOCC方法,每一種方法的闡述分為兩個(gè)方面：一是方法的理論闡釋,二是方法的述評(píng)。通過理論框架的分析可以對(duì)該方法有一個(gè)整體的了解,然后對(duì)方法存在的不足進(jìn)行闡述,爭取為方法的進(jìn)一步完善提供借鑒。 第三章為2011輪ICP建筑國際比較的方法研究。本章將2011輪建筑國際比較方法按項(xiàng)目實(shí)施進(jìn)程,分階段闡述,新方法的實(shí)施過程主要分四個(gè)階段進(jìn)行,一是價(jià)格數(shù)據(jù)獲取階段,該階段的主要內(nèi)容為建筑層級(jí)劃分；制定材料清單；價(jià)格數(shù)據(jù)及物品重要性數(shù)據(jù)的獲取,二是權(quán)重?cái)?shù)據(jù)獲取階段,其主要內(nèi)容包括子類在每個(gè)基本類中的權(quán)重；三大基本類在建筑中的權(quán)重,三是PPP數(shù)據(jù)調(diào)整階段,數(shù)據(jù)調(diào)整主要包括各種調(diào)整因子的調(diào)整及生產(chǎn)率的調(diào)整,四是數(shù)據(jù)驗(yàn)證階段,數(shù)據(jù)驗(yàn)證主要分為國家內(nèi)部的驗(yàn)證；區(qū)域范圍的驗(yàn)證；全球范圍的驗(yàn)證三個(gè)層次。 第四章為建筑國際比較的重難點(diǎn)研究。主要從兼顧建筑規(guī)格品的代表性與可比性；材料和產(chǎn)品存在質(zhì)量差異問題；數(shù)據(jù)的有效性三個(gè)方面進(jìn)行分析,這是本文的主要內(nèi)容。 第五章為我國參與建筑國際比較存在的問題及建議。本章從我國建筑業(yè)對(duì)外開放程度及市場化程度不高；我國建筑項(xiàng)目招標(biāo)中,圍標(biāo)、串標(biāo)現(xiàn)象影響正常價(jià)格水平的獲取；我國建筑項(xiàng)目規(guī)模分化與發(fā)達(dá)國家存在差異；我國統(tǒng)計(jì)發(fā)展水平的限制四個(gè)方面進(jìn)行分析。 本文的創(chuàng)新點(diǎn)為：本文以建筑國際比較為研究題目本身就是一個(gè)創(chuàng)新點(diǎn),目前,國際對(duì)建筑國際比較的研究大都集中于整體的國際比較,對(duì)建筑業(yè)的研究較少,國內(nèi)對(duì)該領(lǐng)域的研究幾乎處于空白狀態(tài),因此,對(duì)建筑國際比較的研究是本文的一個(gè)創(chuàng)新點(diǎn)。 本文的不足：(1)對(duì)建筑國際比較的方法研究主要集中在理論分析層面；因沒有機(jī)會(huì)參與建筑國際比較的實(shí)際操作,因此對(duì)這些方法在操作環(huán)節(jié)上的可能存在的問題未能做細(xì)致研究。(2)對(duì)建筑國際比較的研究,主要是基于統(tǒng)計(jì)學(xué)專業(yè)角度,建筑專業(yè)角度的分析顯得不足。
[Abstract]:ICP is a global statistical cooperation project, the main purpose of which is to measure the purchasing power parity (PPP) of various currencies in order to convert national gross domestic product (GDP) to data expressed in a unified monetary unit with PPP as a conversion factor, thus comparing and evaluating the actual economic scale and structure of countries to be held every 5 years, so far The project has completed seven rounds of international comparison. 2011 is the baseline year of the global eighth round of ICP activities. Since January 2011, 170 countries and regions have carried out ICP surveys simultaneously. The entire project activity is expected to end in the end of 2013. With the approval of the State Council, China will take part in the first round of the new round of ICP activities for the first time.
Based on the eighth round international comparative background, this paper studies the international comparison method of the construction industry. As a part of the total amount of the fixed assets, the proportion of the construction industry in the gross national product can not be ignored. In the process of comparison, because of the strong regional, national and structural complexity of the construction industry, it can not be exploited. With the universal method of international comparison, that is, the construction industry must adopt unique and specialized international comparison methods for international comparison of architecture, but it is also due to the strong regional, national and structural complexity of the construction industry, which makes the research of the architectural comparison method very difficult, a "stubborn disease" which is regarded as international comparison. The research results of the international comparative method of architecture are very limited. This paper is devoted to the research in this field and strives to add a great contribution to the improvement of the international comparative method system in the international comparison projects.
This article is divided into five chapters.
The first chapter is an introduction. It introduces the background and significance of this study, summarizes the research results at home and abroad, and concludes and forms a literature review.
The second chapter is the study of common methods in international architecture. This chapter mainly explains three commonly used international comparison methods of other buildings: OECD-Eurostat method, CIS method and BOCC method. The elaboration of each method is divided into two aspects: the first is the theoretical interpretation of the method, and the two is the review of the method. Have a comprehensive understanding, and then explain the shortcomings of the method, and strive to provide a reference for further improvement of the method.
The third chapter is the study of the international comparison of the 2011 round ICP architecture. This chapter introduces the international comparison method of the 2011 round architecture according to the project implementation process. The implementation process of the new method is divided into four stages, one is the phase of the price data acquisition, the main content of this stage is the construction level division, the material list and the price data are made. And the acquisition of material importance data, two is the weight data acquisition stage, its main content includes the weight of sub class in each basic class; the weight of the three basic classes in the building, three is the PPP data adjustment stage, the data adjustment mainly includes the adjustment of various adjustment factors and the adjustment of production yield, four is the data verification stage, data inspection. The certificate is mainly divided into three parts: the verification within the country; the verification of the regional scope; and the verification of the whole world.
The fourth chapter is the important and difficult research in the international comparison of architecture. The main content is to take into account the representativeness and comparability of the architectural specifications, the quality differences of materials and products, and the three aspects of the validity of the data.
The fifth chapter is the problems and suggestions for the international comparison of China's participation in the building of architecture. This chapter is not high in the degree of opening to the outside world and the degree of marketization in the construction industry of our country; in the bidding of construction projects in China, the phenomenon of bids and collusion affects the acquisition of the normal price level; the differentiation of the scale of construction projects in our country is different from that of the developed countries; Four aspects of the level are analyzed.
The innovation point of this article is that the research topic itself is an innovation point with the international comparison of architecture. At present, the international comparison of architectural international comparison is mostly concentrated on the international comparison of the whole, the research on the construction industry is less, and the domestic research on this field is almost blank. Therefore, the research on the international comparison of the architecture is the original. An innovative point in the article.
The insufficiency of this article: (1) the research on the methods of building international comparison is mainly focused on the theoretical analysis level; because there is no opportunity to participate in the actual operation of the international comparison of the architecture, the possible problems of these methods in the operation are not studied carefully. (2) the Research on the international comparison of the architecture is mainly based on the statistics specialty. The angle of view, the analysis of the architectural professional angle is insufficient.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：東北財(cái)經(jīng)大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2013
【分類號(hào)】：F426.92

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 王成岐;匯率法與ICP法換算各國人均收入偏差的實(shí)證分析[J];財(cái)經(jīng)問題研究;1994年05期

2 余芳東;;我國經(jīng)濟(jì)的國際地位和發(fā)展差距[J];調(diào)研世界;2011年03期

3 華人鳳;;建設(shè)工程招投標(biāo)中不平等問題的探討[J];建筑經(jīng)濟(jì);2008年11期

4 段軍;如何看待我國的購買力平價(jià)[J];統(tǒng)計(jì)與決策;2003年04期

5 余芳東;購買力平價(jià)匯總方法及評(píng)價(jià)[J];統(tǒng)計(jì)教育;2004年04期

6 余芳東;;國際比較項(xiàng)目數(shù)據(jù)質(zhì)量評(píng)估框架[J];統(tǒng)計(jì)教育;2010年06期

7 鄭尊信,沈福喜,任英華;購買力平價(jià)理論的應(yīng)用探析[J];統(tǒng)計(jì)與信息論壇;2003年01期

8 余芳東;購買力平價(jià)和匯率方法的差異程度及其原因分析[J];統(tǒng)計(jì)研究;2003年08期

9 常寧;IMF的數(shù)據(jù)質(zhì)量評(píng)估框架及啟示[J];統(tǒng)計(jì)研究;2004年01期

10 余芳東;;當(dāng)前全球國際比較項(xiàng)目(ICP)的進(jìn)展及其基本方法[J];統(tǒng)計(jì)研究;2007年01期

，

本文編號(hào)：2089842