本文選題：耐藥菌 + 謹(jǐn)慎處理　； 參考：《科技導(dǎo)報》2016年23期

【摘要】：正2016年11月,瑞典哥德堡大學(xué)研究人員在《Microbiome》發(fā)表"The structureand diversity of human,animal and envi-ronmental resistomes"(人、動物和環(huán)境耐藥基因組的結(jié)構(gòu)與多樣性)一文,被部分國內(nèi)媒體誤讀,將北京霧霾與耐藥菌捆綁在一起,稱北京霧霾中存在耐藥菌且其對抗生素具有耐藥性,引發(fā)了公眾熱議。隨后,國內(nèi)權(quán)威媒體邀請相關(guān)領(lǐng)域科研人員進(jìn)行了解讀辟謠,但"搶先發(fā)布、隨后矯正"的報道方式并不利于科學(xué)的有效傳播。學(xué)術(shù)成果的科學(xué)化報道究竟如何開展,對待存疑的結(jié)論,如何謹(jǐn)慎處理并客
[Abstract]:In November 2016, researchers at the University of Gothenburg in Sweden published an article entitled "The structureand diversity of human animal and envi-ronmental resistomes" (structure and diversity of drug-resistant genomes in humans, animals and environments), which was misread by some domestic media and bundled Beijing haze with drug-resistant bacteria. Public debate over the presence of drug-resistant bacteria in Beijing's haze and their resistance to antibiotics has sparked public debate. Later, the domestic authoritative media invited researchers in relevant fields to interpret and refute the rumor, but the "first release, then correction" report was not conducive to the effective dissemination of science. How to carry out the Scientific report on academic achievements, how to deal with the conclusion of doubt, and how to deal with the problem carefully
【分類號】：G206;G322
，

本文編號：1985079