本文選題：專利交易訴訟戰(zhàn)略　切入點：專利掠奪訴訟戰(zhàn)略　出處：《華中科技大學》2011年博士論文　論文類型：學位論文

【摘要】：在激烈的市場競爭中,專利對外授權(quán)許可使用或經(jīng)由訴訟賠償所產(chǎn)生的巨額收益已經(jīng)成為企業(yè)的重要收入來源之一,企業(yè)也更多地尋求通過專利訴訟戰(zhàn)略來獲得競爭優(yōu)勢。本文通過探討企業(yè)專利訴訟戰(zhàn)略的內(nèi)涵、形成和運作模式,指出企業(yè)專利訴訟戰(zhàn)略對我國企業(yè)發(fā)展的影響,并且為增強我國企業(yè)在國內(nèi)外市場競爭中的糾紛處理、預(yù)防潛在專利訴訟風險的能力提出了對策建議。本文的主要研究內(nèi)容如下： 首先,基于戰(zhàn)略管理的視角,本文指出企業(yè)專利訴訟戰(zhàn)略的形成呈現(xiàn)出一種以企業(yè)專利戰(zhàn)略規(guī)劃、選擇與實施的三個步驟為中心的邏輯主軸。在此基礎(chǔ)上,提煉出企業(yè)專利交易訴訟戰(zhàn)略、專利掠奪訴訟戰(zhàn)略、專利投資訴訟戰(zhàn)略和專利訴訟防御戰(zhàn)略四種訴訟戰(zhàn)略類型。并進一步從這四種專利訴訟戰(zhàn)略的內(nèi)涵、戰(zhàn)略的運用、訴訟資源獲取等方面進行比較分析,探索了它們與專利戰(zhàn)略之間相互作用、相互影響的動態(tài)關(guān)聯(lián)性。 其次,本文構(gòu)建了基于博弈論視角的企業(yè)專利訴訟戰(zhàn)略模型,并重點運用模型詮釋了四種專利訴訟戰(zhàn)略的實施條件和戰(zhàn)略結(jié)果,進而得以討論了專利訴訟戰(zhàn)略的運行機理,以及不同的戰(zhàn)略類型與企業(yè)技術(shù)創(chuàng)新的關(guān)系。研究結(jié)果指出,不同的專利組合差距和損害賠償?shù)慕M合可能對應(yīng)不同的專利訴訟戰(zhàn)略類型,而不同的專利訴訟戰(zhàn)略類型對企業(yè)技術(shù)創(chuàng)新的影響程度和關(guān)系也具有明顯的差異。 再次,對當前新的創(chuàng)新模式和商業(yè)模式下,具有代表性的企業(yè)專利訴訟戰(zhàn)略運作模式進行深入剖析。本研究以專利聯(lián)盟、專利釣餌、專利信托聯(lián)盟(AST公司)、合理交易公司(RPX公司)以及美國高智發(fā)明公司(IV公司)作為研究典型,通過案例研究方法,深入分析了這些組織或公司的專利訴訟戰(zhàn)略運作模式,指出：專利聯(lián)盟內(nèi)部通過許可協(xié)議避免了專利侵權(quán)風險、完成了交易的過程,而專利聯(lián)盟外部則體現(xiàn)對非聯(lián)盟成員或競爭對手實施專利掠奪訴訟戰(zhàn)略；專利釣餌實施專利投資訴訟戰(zhàn)略,通過風險資本的運作,對外收購專利,將這些專利進行一定的組合發(fā)揮規(guī)模優(yōu)勢,反過來再運用專利訴訟戰(zhàn)略所產(chǎn)生的現(xiàn)金流用以支撐未來的收購行為；專利信托聯(lián)盟與合理交易公司代表著訴訟防御戰(zhàn)略運作模式的出現(xiàn),這是一種應(yīng)對專利釣餌投資訴訟戰(zhàn)略的反制機制；高智發(fā)明公司的運作模式則代表著企業(yè)專利訴訟戰(zhàn)略的一種組合實施,利用其匯集起來龐大的專利資產(chǎn)庫,不但進行專利資產(chǎn)的交易和投資,而且還可以防御專利訴訟,有時甚至通過訴訟戰(zhàn)略直接對外掠奪。 最后,針對企業(yè)專利訴訟戰(zhàn)略提出了對策建議。本研究選取了三個典型案例,分析了企業(yè)專利訴訟戰(zhàn)略對我國企業(yè)的影響及其成因,在此基礎(chǔ)上提出了我國企業(yè)應(yīng)對專利訴訟戰(zhàn)略的具體對策建議：首先,建議加強我國企業(yè)內(nèi)部知識產(chǎn)權(quán)管理體系的建設(shè),從創(chuàng)造、管理、交易、影響和防御五個環(huán)節(jié),建立一套完善的應(yīng)對侵權(quán)指控的操作程序；其次,提出建立全行業(yè)聯(lián)合防御機制,增強企業(yè)共同抵御外來風險的能力；最后,建議政府應(yīng)從立法、監(jiān)管和引導三個方面發(fā)揮積極作用,監(jiān)視外國企業(yè)在中國的知識產(chǎn)權(quán)交易行為,幫助企業(yè)防范侵權(quán)訴訟指控。
[Abstract]:In the fierce market competition, the huge gains foreign patent licensing or through lawsuits arising has become an important source of income of the enterprise, the enterprise will seek more through patent litigation strategy to gain a competitive advantage. This paper discusses the connotation of corporate patent litigation strategy, form and mode of operation, and points out that the effect of patent litigation the strategy for the development of Chinese enterprises, and to enhance the market competition at home and abroad to settle disputes in China's enterprises, and puts forward some countermeasures and suggestions to prevent potential patent litigation risk. The main contents of this paper are as follows:
First of all, based on the perspective of strategic management, this paper points out that the formation of corporate patent litigation strategy presents a clear enterprise patent strategy planning, three steps of selection and implementation of logic as the center of the spindle. On this basis, refine the enterprise patent trading litigation strategy patent plunder litigation strategy, patent investing litigation and patent litigation strategy defense strategy four litigation strategy. And further from the connotation of the four types of patent litigation strategies, strategy use, litigation resource acquisition and so on, to explore the interaction between them and the patent strategy, the dynamic relationship between the mutual influence.
Secondly, this paper constructs a game theory of enterprise patent litigation strategy model based on the perspective of the interpretation of the model and focus on the use of four kinds of patent litigation strategy implementation conditions and strategic results, and to the operation mechanism of patent litigation strategy is discussed, and the relationship between innovation strategy and different types of enterprise technology. The results indicate that the different patent portfolio gaps and damages may correspond to different combinations of the types of patent litigation strategy, and the influence degree and the relationship of different types of patent litigation strategy on the technological innovation of the enterprise also has the obvious difference.
Again, the new model of innovation and business mode, representative enterprise patent litigation strategy mode in-depth analysis. Based on the patent alliance, patent trolls, patent trust Alliance (AST), reasonable trading company (RPX company) and the United States intellectual company (IV company) as a typical study and through the case study method, in-depth analysis of the patent litigation strategy mode of operation, the organization or company that the patent pool avoids the risk of patent infringement by the license agreement, the completion of the transaction process, and is reflected in the implementation of the patent patent alliance external predatory litigation strategy for non union members or competitors; patent trolls patent investment the litigation strategy, through venture capital operation, the acquisition of foreign patents, these patents are combined together to take advantage of the scale, and then use the counter to patent litigation battle A little cash flow to support future acquisitions; patent trust alliance and reasonable trading company represents the litigation defense strategy mode of operation, this is a response to the Patent Troll litigation strategy investment counter mechanism; intellectual mode of operation of the company will represent a combination of patent litigation strategy the implementation of the patent together huge asset base, not only for patent asset trading and investment, but also can defense patent litigation, sometimes through litigation strategy of foreign direct plunder.
Finally, in view of the enterprise patent litigation strategy and puts forward some countermeasures and suggestions. This study selected three typical cases, analyzes the influence of enterprise patent litigation strategy for China's enterprises and their causes, and puts forward some specific countermeasures and suggestions for Chinese enterprises to cope with the patent litigation strategy: first, suggestions to strengthen our internal management of intellectual property rights the construction of the system, from the creation, management, transaction, impact and defense five links, set up a perfect deal with the infringement procedures; secondly, the whole industry proposed the establishment of a joint defense mechanism, enhance the ability of enterprises toresist risk; finally, suggested that the government should be legislative, regulatory and guide the three aspects play the active role of the surveillance of foreign enterprise intellectual property transactions in Chinese, help enterprises to prevent infringement lawsuit.

【學位授予單位】：華中科技大學
【學位級別】：博士
【學位授予年份】：2011
【分類號】：F279.2;G306

【引證文獻】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前3條

1 盧章平;黃晉;;美國涉訴專利分析及啟示[J];科技管理研究;2014年06期

2 白穎;;云計算專利分析與企業(yè)專利戰(zhàn)略研究[J];現(xiàn)代計算機;2013年19期

3 鄭義;王思楠;;保護性專利審查機制對企業(yè)專利戰(zhàn)略效應(yīng)研究——基于專利條件壽命期的視角[J];中小企業(yè)管理與科技(下旬刊);2014年09期

相關(guān)碩士學位論文 前5條

1 柴森;企業(yè)PCT專利戰(zhàn)略研究[D];廣東商學院;2013年

2 程榮榮;基于主從博弈模型的專利許可與專利訴訟策略研究[D];青島大學;2013年

3 王偉;國際知識產(chǎn)權(quán)環(huán)境下中國企業(yè)專利保護研究[D];上海交通大學;2013年

4 龔夢;廣東省戰(zhàn)略性新興產(chǎn)業(yè)專利聯(lián)盟合作博弈研究[D];廣東工業(yè)大學;2014年

5 王雯;云計算的專利權(quán)保護研究[D];蘭州大學;2014年

，

本文編號：1597402