本文選題：城市功能　切入點(diǎn)：科技創(chuàng)新功能　出處：《華東師范大學(xué)》2012年碩士論文　論文類型：學(xué)位論文

【摘要】：科技創(chuàng)新能力已經(jīng)成為衡量一個(gè)城市綜合實(shí)力的重要標(biāo)準(zhǔn)�，F(xiàn)代城市間的競爭愈來愈集中于科學(xué)創(chuàng)新能力的競爭,創(chuàng)新已成為推動(dòng)城市經(jīng)濟(jì)發(fā)展的重要內(nèi)在動(dòng)力,并逐漸發(fā)展成為城市的一個(gè)重要功能。北京與上海作為我國最大的兩座城市,都擔(dān)負(fù)著建設(shè)社會(huì)主義現(xiàn)代化國際大都市的歷史使命,而這個(gè)目標(biāo)的實(shí)現(xiàn),離不開科技創(chuàng)新的推動(dòng)和支撐。考察紐約、倫敦、東京等著名全球性城市的發(fā)展規(guī)律,不難發(fā)現(xiàn),國際經(jīng)濟(jì)中心城市的建設(shè),不僅僅是將城市規(guī)模和經(jīng)濟(jì)總量繼續(xù)做大,更重要的是要不斷提升城市的創(chuàng)新功能。研究科技創(chuàng)新在北京與上海城市功能中的定位,有利于北京和上海提高各自的綜合實(shí)力。 本文借助城市經(jīng)濟(jì)基礎(chǔ)和城市功能的相關(guān)理論,闡明了城市功能、科技創(chuàng)新與科技創(chuàng)新城市的關(guān)系,提出了城市科技創(chuàng)新功能的概念、內(nèi)涵和表現(xiàn)方式,并從城市經(jīng)濟(jì)活動(dòng)的基本部分與非基本部分兩個(gè)方面入手,構(gòu)建了城市科技創(chuàng)新功能的評(píng)價(jià)指標(biāo)體系,提出了科技創(chuàng)新城市的概念內(nèi)涵,并初步設(shè)定了科技創(chuàng)新城市的判定標(biāo)準(zhǔn)。北京與上海的科技創(chuàng)新功能的評(píng)價(jià)結(jié)果表明：目前北京與上海科技創(chuàng)新功能雖然近幾年來有所發(fā)展,但仍然未達(dá)到科技創(chuàng)新城市所需的最低功能要求,離科技創(chuàng)新城市還有較大距離。上海的科技創(chuàng)新功能總體表現(xiàn)比北京好,上海的科技創(chuàng)新投入較少,但效益更高；尤其是基本部分發(fā)展較快,即科技創(chuàng)新對(duì)外輻射與服務(wù)的水平比北京高。北京與上海仍然都是以制造業(yè)為主的城市,科技創(chuàng)新功能與其他城市功能的優(yōu)勢地位不夠明顯。北京與上海的科技創(chuàng)新功能易受國際環(huán)境的影響,這與北京上海的大部分科技創(chuàng)新活動(dòng)仍舊處于低端技術(shù)服務(wù)的市場地位有關(guān),核心技術(shù)和原始創(chuàng)新不足導(dǎo)致了它們科技創(chuàng)新功能的發(fā)展處于相對(duì)不穩(wěn)定的狀態(tài)。目前,兩個(gè)城市都處于科技創(chuàng)新功能發(fā)展的關(guān)鍵時(shí)刻,由于還受到國內(nèi)外其他城市的激烈競爭,它們的科技創(chuàng)新功能發(fā)展面臨較大的挑戰(zhàn)。 本文掛靠2011年上海市科技發(fā)展基金軟科學(xué)研究重點(diǎn)項(xiàng)目“上海城市發(fā)展中科技創(chuàng)新功能定位與發(fā)展路徑研究”(項(xiàng)目編號(hào)：11692100700)。通過上述實(shí)證分析,針對(duì)北京和上�？萍紕�(chuàng)新功能發(fā)展的問題、任務(wù),本文從以下三方面來設(shè)計(jì)北京與上海未來科技創(chuàng)新功能提升的發(fā)展與具體對(duì)策：(1)建設(shè)一批高素質(zhì)的科技創(chuàng)新人才隊(duì)伍；(2)鼓勵(lì)本地企業(yè)積極開展科技創(chuàng)新活動(dòng)；(3)優(yōu)化城市的科技創(chuàng)新環(huán)境。
[Abstract]:The ability of scientific and technological innovation has become an important standard to measure the comprehensive strength of a city. The competition among modern cities is more and more concentrated on the competition of scientific innovation ability, and innovation has become an important internal power to promote the development of urban economy. Beijing and Shanghai, as the two largest cities in our country, both shoulder the historical mission of building a socialist modern international metropolis, and this goal is realized. It is not difficult to find that the construction of international economic center cities will not only continue to expand the scale and total economic volume of cities, but also the development laws of famous global cities, such as New York, London and Tokyo, can not be separated from the promotion and support of scientific and technological innovation. It is more important to continuously improve the innovation function of the city, and to study the position of scientific and technological innovation in the urban function of Beijing and Shanghai is beneficial to the improvement of their comprehensive strength. Based on the relevant theories of urban economic base and urban function, this paper clarifies the relationship between urban function, scientific and technological innovation and scientific and technological innovation city, and puts forward the concept, connotation and expression of urban sci-tech innovation function. Starting with the basic and non-basic parts of urban economic activities, this paper constructs the evaluation index system of the function of urban scientific and technological innovation, and puts forward the concept connotation of scientific and technological innovation city. The evaluation results of the functions of science and technology innovation in Beijing and Shanghai show that although the functions of science and technology innovation in Beijing and Shanghai have developed in recent years, However, the function of science and technology innovation in Shanghai is better than that in Beijing, the investment of science and technology innovation in Shanghai is less, but the benefit is higher. In particular, the basic parts are developing faster, that is, the level of external radiation and service of science and technology innovation is higher than that of Beijing. Both Beijing and Shanghai are still mainly manufacturing cities. The functions of science and technology innovation and other cities are not obvious enough. The functions of science and technology innovation in Beijing and Shanghai are easily influenced by the international environment. This is related to the fact that most of the scientific and technological innovation activities in Beijing and Shanghai are still in the market position of low-end technology services. The lack of core technology and original innovation has led to the relatively unstable development of their scientific and technological innovation functions. At present, Both cities are in the critical moment of the development of science and technology innovation function, because of the fierce competition of other cities at home and abroad, their science and technology innovation function development faces great challenge. This paper is based on the key project of soft science research of Shanghai Science and Technology Development Foundation in 2011, "Research on function orientation and Development path of Science and Technology Innovation in Shanghai Urban Development" (Project No.: 11692100700). In view of the problems and tasks of the development of scientific and technological innovation functions in Beijing and Shanghai, This paper designs the following three aspects to design the development and concrete countermeasures of the future scientific and technological innovation function promotion in Beijing and Shanghai. (1) to build a group of high-quality scientific and technological innovation talents. (2) to encourage local enterprises to actively carry out scientific and technological innovation activities. The scientific and technological innovation environment of the city.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：華東師范大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2012
【分類號(hào)】：G322.7

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 陳良猷,韓新偉;未來科技創(chuàng)新趨勢與特點(diǎn)的一些認(rèn)識(shí)[J];北京航空航天大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2002年03期

2 劉志頤;;北京建設(shè)世界城市的經(jīng)濟(jì)控制力與人才戰(zhàn)略研究[J];北京市經(jīng)濟(jì)管理干部學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2011年01期

3 李國平;世界城市格局演化與北京建設(shè)世界城市的基本定位[J];城市發(fā)展研究;2000年01期

4 徐穎;;北京建設(shè)世界城市戰(zhàn)略定位與發(fā)展模式研究[J];城市發(fā)展研究;2011年03期

5 童昕,王緝慈;北京與上海創(chuàng)新性產(chǎn)業(yè)比較研究[J];城市規(guī)劃;2005年04期

6 曾剛;李英戈;樊杰;;京滬區(qū)域創(chuàng)新系統(tǒng)比較研究[J];城市規(guī)劃;2006年03期

7 唐禮智;;硅谷模式的模仿與創(chuàng)新——以新竹和班加羅爾為例[J];城市問題;2007年10期

8 薛東前,姚士謀,李波;我國省會(huì)城市職能類型的分離與職能優(yōu)化配置[J];地理科學(xué)進(jìn)展;2000年02期

9 周一星,R.布雷德肖;中國城市(包括轄縣)的工業(yè)職能分類——理論、方法和結(jié)果[J];地理學(xué)報(bào);1988年04期

10 甄峰,徐海賢,朱傳耿;創(chuàng)新地理學(xué)——一門新興的地理學(xué)分支學(xué)科[J];地域研究與開發(fā);2001年01期

相關(guān)博士學(xué)位論文 前3條

1 張付剛;我國省會(huì)城市城市功能差異研究[D];蘭州大學(xué);2011年

2 趙志強(qiáng);連云港市科技創(chuàng)新能力建設(shè)及評(píng)估體系研究[D];南京林業(yè)大學(xué);2004年

3 申小蓉;國際視野下的科技型城市研究[D];四川大學(xué);2006年

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前10條

1 黃力韻;產(chǎn)業(yè)創(chuàng)新與上海城市功能提升研究[D];華東師范大學(xué);2011年

2 占毅;關(guān)于科技創(chuàng)新體系建構(gòu)中的若干問題及對(duì)策探討[D];武漢理工大學(xué);2004年

3 崔蘊(yùn);上海市生產(chǎn)性服務(wù)業(yè)發(fā)展與城市功能提升研究[D];華東師范大學(xué);2005年

4 汪偉;上海市科技創(chuàng)新能力及其績效評(píng)價(jià)[D];同濟(jì)大學(xué);2006年

5 陳萍萍;上海城市功能提升與城市更新[D];華東師范大學(xué);2006年

6 張紅彩;北京制造業(yè)技術(shù)創(chuàng)新能力與技術(shù)創(chuàng)新效率的研究[D];北京工業(yè)大學(xué);2006年

7 翟孝強(qiáng);關(guān)于把上海建成世界城市的思考[D];東南大學(xué);2006年

8 溫潔潔;珠三角城市群中心城市競爭和功能聯(lián)系研究[D];暨南大學(xué);2007年

9 孫克;京滬技術(shù)創(chuàng)新能力比較分析[D];北京大學(xué);2008年

10 韓秀霜;以發(fā)展生產(chǎn)性服務(wù)業(yè)提升北京城市功能[D];首都師范大學(xué);2008年

，

本文編號(hào)：1570952