商業(yè)銀行越來(lái)越多地采用業(yè)務(wù)信息技術(shù)（業(yè)務(wù)信息技術(shù)）配合,前景充滿希望,而其復(fù)雜性仍然具有挑戰(zhàn)性。如果要利用最佳成果,如何準(zhǔn)確地調(diào)整業(yè)務(wù)需求,提高業(yè)務(wù)對(duì)專業(yè)知識(shí)和新穎的呼叫。本研究分析了企業(yè)-信息技術(shù)協(xié)調(diào)對(duì)塞拉利昂銀行業(yè)務(wù)業(yè)績(jī)的影響。兩種業(yè)務(wù)-信息技術(shù)對(duì)銀行財(cái)務(wù)、業(yè)務(wù)業(yè)績(jī)和業(yè)務(wù)-信息技術(shù)對(duì)銀行非財(cái)務(wù)業(yè)務(wù)業(yè)績(jī)的影響。在收集數(shù)據(jù)和選擇正確樣本后,利用SPSS和Smart PLS軟件分析了數(shù)據(jù)。SPSS被用來(lái)計(jì)算Cronbach的Alpha號(hào)進(jìn)行試驗(yàn)測(cè)試和人口信息。利用智能PLS軟件分析了兩種模型的測(cè)量和結(jié)構(gòu)結(jié)果。分析方法是基于局部最小二乘結(jié)構(gòu)方程建模。第一個(gè)模型的結(jié)果表明,治理、能力/價(jià)值衡量、技能、伙伴關(guān)系、范圍和企業(yè)-信息技術(shù)協(xié)調(diào)結(jié)構(gòu),對(duì)塞拉利昂商業(yè)銀行的財(cái)務(wù)、業(yè)務(wù)業(yè)績(jī)產(chǎn)生了積極和重大的影響。雖然能力和價(jià)值測(cè)量稍有正面性,但只有通信變量顯示微不足道。第二個(gè)模型,除了能力和價(jià)值測(cè)量之外,這表明業(yè)務(wù)與信息技術(shù)對(duì)齊無(wú)關(guān)。其余部分與銀行部門的非金融業(yè)務(wù)業(yè)績(jī)有著重大的積極聯(lián)系。治理對(duì)銀行財(cái)務(wù)、業(yè)務(wù)業(yè)績(jī)的影響最大,其次是技能和范圍以及架構(gòu)。對(duì)銀行財(cái)務(wù)、業(yè)務(wù)業(yè)績(jī)的影響最小的變量是能力/價(jià)值衡量。在第二... 

【文章來(lái)源】：哈爾濱工業(yè)大學(xué)黑龍江省 211工程院校 985工程院校

【文章頁(yè)數(shù)】：94 頁(yè)

【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士

【文章目錄】：
摘要
Abstract
List of Acronyms
Chapter 1.Introduction
    1.1 Background and Significance of the Study
        1.1.1 Background
        1.1.2 Significance of the Study
    1.2 Problem Statement and Objectives
        1.2.1 Problem Statement
        1.2.2 Research Objective
        1.2.3 Research Questions
    1.3 Literature Review
    1.4 Main Research Contents and Structure
        1.4.1 Main Research Content
        1.4.2 Research Structure
Chapter 2.Relative Theories
    2.1 Relative Theories
        2.1.1 The Strategic Alignment Model（SAM）
        2.1.2 The Generic Framework Alignment Model（GFAM）
        2.1.3 Extended Strategic Alignment Model（E-SAM）
        2.1.4 Inhibitors and Enablers of Strategic Alignment
        2.1.5 Strategic Alignment Maturity Model（SAMM）
        2.1.6 Other Models Measuring Strategic-Alignment
    2.2 Chapter Summary
Chapter 3.Research Methodology And Hypothesis
    3.1 Research Model
    3.2 Relative Methods
        3.2.1 The Structural Equation Modelling（SEM）
        3.2.2 Relative Methods of SEM analysis
    3.3 Hypothesis Development
        3.3.1 Communication-BIT-Alignment with Operational Financial Performance
        3.3.2 Competency/Value Measurement-BIT-Alignment with Operational Performance
        3.3.3 Governance–BIT-Alignment with Operational Performance
        3.3.4 Skills-BIT-Alignment with Operational Performance
        3.3.5 Scope and Architecture-BIT-Alignment with Operational Performance
        3.3.6 Business Partnership-BIT-Alignment with Operational Performance
    3.4 Research Instrument and Method
        3.4.1 Research Instrument
        3.4.2 Research Technique
    3.5 Method of Data Analysis
    3.6 Demographic Information of Participants
    3.7 Chapter Summary
Chapter 4.Experiments And Results
    4.1 Model1;Business-IT-Alignment and Operational-Financial-Performance
        4.1.1 Convergent Validity of Model 1
        4.1.2 Internal Consistency of Model 1
        4.1.3 Discriminant Validity of Model 1
        4.1.4 The Model Fit of Model 1
        4.1.5 Structural Model 1
    4.2 Model2;Business-IT Alignment and Operational Non-Financial Performance
        4.2.1 Internal Consistency of Model 2
        4.2.2 Convergent Validity of Model 2
        4.2.3 Discriminant Validity of Model 2
        4.2.4 Goodness of Fit of Model2
        4.2.5 Structural Model 2
    4.3 Results Discussion
    4.4 Main Contribution of the Study
        4.4.1 Theoretical Contributions
        4.4.2 Practical Contributions
    4.5 Chapter Summary
Conclusion and Further Work
Reference
Appendix
Acknowledgements
Resume



本文編號(hào)：2989767