我國(guó)投資銀行IPO定價(jià)效率研究
發(fā)布時(shí)間：2018-09-19 17:55
【摘要】：我國(guó)證券市場(chǎng)經(jīng)過(guò)近二十年的高速發(fā)展,形成了主板、中小板、創(chuàng)業(yè)板以及三板市場(chǎng)等的多層次資本市場(chǎng)體系,成為國(guó)民經(jīng)濟(jì)中不可或缺的組成部分,對(duì)我國(guó)經(jīng)濟(jì)的順暢運(yùn)行發(fā)揮著越來(lái)越關(guān)鍵的作用。然而,在我國(guó)上市公司數(shù)量急劇增加、融資規(guī)模不斷擴(kuò)大的同時(shí),高發(fā)行市盈率、高抑價(jià)率的“雙高現(xiàn)象”也一直是我國(guó)證券市場(chǎng)的熱門討論話題。新股動(dòng)輒五六十倍、甚至上百倍的發(fā)行市盈率,新股上市首日爆炒增長(zhǎng)翻倍的現(xiàn)象頻繁發(fā)生。這不免讓人們對(duì)我國(guó)IPO定價(jià)水平的合理性及IPO定價(jià)的有效性產(chǎn)生懷疑。 國(guó)內(nèi)外研究文獻(xiàn)普遍采用新股抑價(jià)水平來(lái)度量新股定價(jià)的有效性,并從信息不對(duì)稱、行為金融理論等角度對(duì)新股抑價(jià)現(xiàn)象進(jìn)行了論證和解釋�？傮w來(lái)看,信息不對(duì)稱解釋模型以有效市場(chǎng)和完全理性為前提,認(rèn)為二級(jí)市場(chǎng)價(jià)格是有效的,反映了股票的內(nèi)在價(jià)值,新股定價(jià)偏低；而行為金融理論則承認(rèn)非理性行為的存在,認(rèn)為市場(chǎng)上存在噪聲交易者,二級(jí)市場(chǎng)價(jià)格并非有效,而是受投資者情緒的影響而存在溢價(jià)。既往研究對(duì)新股上市首日超額收益到底是反映一級(jí)市場(chǎng)抑價(jià),還是反映二級(jí)市場(chǎng)溢價(jià),尚未形成統(tǒng)一的認(rèn)識(shí)。 本文在梳理和歸納國(guó)內(nèi)外新股抑價(jià)理論的基礎(chǔ)上,實(shí)證檢驗(yàn)了我國(guó)新股發(fā)行市場(chǎng)化改革進(jìn)程中IPO定價(jià)的有效性,以期為新股抑價(jià)現(xiàn)象的解釋提供進(jìn)一步的經(jīng)驗(yàn)證據(jù)。本文實(shí)證研究結(jié)果表明,2005-2012年我國(guó)IPO普遍存在抑價(jià)現(xiàn)象,而隨著2009年6月證監(jiān)會(huì)發(fā)布《關(guān)于進(jìn)一步改革和完善新股發(fā)行體制的指導(dǎo)意見》,新股抑價(jià)水平明顯下降；我國(guó)投資銀行IPO定價(jià)具備一定的有效性,能夠反映盈利能力、營(yíng)運(yùn)能力等公司內(nèi)在價(jià)值因素,且與創(chuàng)業(yè)板相比,主板、中小板的IPO定價(jià)表現(xiàn)出更高的效率；我國(guó)一級(jí)市場(chǎng)價(jià)格比二級(jí)市場(chǎng)價(jià)格表現(xiàn)出更強(qiáng)的有效性,我國(guó)二級(jí)市場(chǎng)價(jià)格并非完全有效,因此我國(guó)IPO抑價(jià)現(xiàn)象并不能完全以有效市場(chǎng)下的信息不對(duì)稱角度進(jìn)行解釋。 同時(shí),本文還實(shí)證檢驗(yàn)了投資銀行聲譽(yù)、費(fèi)率對(duì)IPO定價(jià)效率的影響,實(shí)證研究結(jié)果表明：我國(guó)投資銀行聲譽(yù)與IPO抑價(jià)水平之間呈負(fù)相關(guān)關(guān)系,但不顯著,這說(shuō)明我國(guó)尚未建立有效的投資銀行聲譽(yù)機(jī)制；而與高聲譽(yù)投資銀行相比,低聲譽(yù)投資銀行的IPO定價(jià)表現(xiàn)出與公司內(nèi)在價(jià)值因素之間更高的關(guān)聯(lián)度,我們認(rèn)為這可能是高聲譽(yù)投資銀行面臨較低的發(fā)行風(fēng)險(xiǎn)和合理定價(jià)壓力；我們沒有發(fā)現(xiàn)投資銀行費(fèi)率與IPO定價(jià)效率、抑價(jià)水平之間存在顯著相關(guān)關(guān)系；上市首日換手率與IPO抑價(jià)水平呈顯著正相關(guān)關(guān)系,這說(shuō)明投資者情緒及其對(duì)發(fā)行人的異質(zhì)預(yù)期是影響IPO抑價(jià)水平的一個(gè)重要因素。 最后,本文在總結(jié)相關(guān)研究結(jié)論的基礎(chǔ)上從引導(dǎo)投資者理性定價(jià)和強(qiáng)化投資銀行聲譽(yù)機(jī)制兩個(gè)角度,提出了相關(guān)政策建議。
[Abstract]:After nearly 20 years of rapid development, China's securities market has formed a multi-level capital market system, such as main board, small and medium-sized board, growth enterprise market and third board market, and has become an indispensable part of the national economy. The smooth operation of our economy is playing a more and more critical role. However, while the number of listed companies in China is increasing rapidly and the scale of financing is expanding, the "double high phenomenon" of high issue price-earnings ratio and high underpricing rate has always been a hot topic of discussion in China's securities market. New shares often use 50 to 60 times, or even hundreds of times the price-earnings ratio, the first day of new stock speculation doubled phenomenon occurred frequently. This makes people doubt the rationality of IPO pricing level and the validity of IPO pricing. Domestic and foreign literatures generally use IPO underpricing level to measure the effectiveness of IPO pricing, and demonstrate and explain the IPO underpricing phenomenon from the angles of information asymmetry and behavioral finance theory. On the whole, the information asymmetry interpretation model is based on efficient market and complete rationality, and holds that the secondary market price is effective, which reflects the intrinsic value of the stock and the low pricing of the new stock. The behavioral finance theory admits the existence of irrational behavior, and holds that there are noise traders in the market, and the secondary market price is not effective, but due to the influence of investor sentiment, there is a premium. Previous studies have not yet formed a unified understanding of whether the first day excess return of new shares reflects the primary market underpricing or the secondary market premium. On the basis of combing and summing up the theories of underpricing of new shares at home and abroad, this paper empirically tests the validity of IPO pricing in the process of market-oriented reform of new stock issuance in China, in order to provide further empirical evidence for the explanation of underpricing phenomenon of new shares. The empirical results of this paper show that underpricing exists in IPO in China from 2005 to 2012. However, with the release of "guidance on further Reform and improvement of New Stock issuance system" by the Securities Regulatory Commission in June 2009, the underpricing level of new shares decreased significantly. The IPO pricing of Chinese investment bank is effective and can reflect the intrinsic value factors of the company such as profitability and operation ability. Compared with the gem, the IPO pricing of the main board and the small and medium-sized board is more efficient. The primary market price in China is more effective than the secondary market price, and the secondary market price is not completely effective. Therefore, the phenomenon of IPO underpricing in China can not be fully explained by the information asymmetry in the efficient market. At the same time, this paper also empirically tests the influence of investment bank reputation and rate on IPO pricing efficiency. The empirical results show that there is a negative correlation between investment bank reputation and IPO underpricing level, but it is not significant. This shows that China has not established an effective investment bank reputation mechanism, and compared with the high-reputation investment bank, the IPO pricing of the low-reputation investment bank shows a higher correlation with the internal value factors of the company. We think this may be due to the low issuance risk and reasonable pricing pressure faced by high reputation investment banks, and we do not find that there is a significant correlation between investment bank rates and IPO pricing efficiency and underpricing level. There is a significant positive correlation between the turnover rate on the first day of listing and the level of IPO underpricing, which indicates that investor sentiment and its heterogeneity to issuers are an important factor affecting the underpricing level of IPO. Finally, on the basis of summarizing the relevant research conclusions, this paper puts forward the relevant policy recommendations from the two angles of guiding investors' rational pricing and strengthening the reputation mechanism of investment banks.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：復(fù)旦大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2013
【分類號(hào)】：F832.51;F224;F832.3
本文編號(hào)：2250892
[Abstract]:After nearly 20 years of rapid development, China's securities market has formed a multi-level capital market system, such as main board, small and medium-sized board, growth enterprise market and third board market, and has become an indispensable part of the national economy. The smooth operation of our economy is playing a more and more critical role. However, while the number of listed companies in China is increasing rapidly and the scale of financing is expanding, the "double high phenomenon" of high issue price-earnings ratio and high underpricing rate has always been a hot topic of discussion in China's securities market. New shares often use 50 to 60 times, or even hundreds of times the price-earnings ratio, the first day of new stock speculation doubled phenomenon occurred frequently. This makes people doubt the rationality of IPO pricing level and the validity of IPO pricing. Domestic and foreign literatures generally use IPO underpricing level to measure the effectiveness of IPO pricing, and demonstrate and explain the IPO underpricing phenomenon from the angles of information asymmetry and behavioral finance theory. On the whole, the information asymmetry interpretation model is based on efficient market and complete rationality, and holds that the secondary market price is effective, which reflects the intrinsic value of the stock and the low pricing of the new stock. The behavioral finance theory admits the existence of irrational behavior, and holds that there are noise traders in the market, and the secondary market price is not effective, but due to the influence of investor sentiment, there is a premium. Previous studies have not yet formed a unified understanding of whether the first day excess return of new shares reflects the primary market underpricing or the secondary market premium. On the basis of combing and summing up the theories of underpricing of new shares at home and abroad, this paper empirically tests the validity of IPO pricing in the process of market-oriented reform of new stock issuance in China, in order to provide further empirical evidence for the explanation of underpricing phenomenon of new shares. The empirical results of this paper show that underpricing exists in IPO in China from 2005 to 2012. However, with the release of "guidance on further Reform and improvement of New Stock issuance system" by the Securities Regulatory Commission in June 2009, the underpricing level of new shares decreased significantly. The IPO pricing of Chinese investment bank is effective and can reflect the intrinsic value factors of the company such as profitability and operation ability. Compared with the gem, the IPO pricing of the main board and the small and medium-sized board is more efficient. The primary market price in China is more effective than the secondary market price, and the secondary market price is not completely effective. Therefore, the phenomenon of IPO underpricing in China can not be fully explained by the information asymmetry in the efficient market. At the same time, this paper also empirically tests the influence of investment bank reputation and rate on IPO pricing efficiency. The empirical results show that there is a negative correlation between investment bank reputation and IPO underpricing level, but it is not significant. This shows that China has not established an effective investment bank reputation mechanism, and compared with the high-reputation investment bank, the IPO pricing of the low-reputation investment bank shows a higher correlation with the internal value factors of the company. We think this may be due to the low issuance risk and reasonable pricing pressure faced by high reputation investment banks, and we do not find that there is a significant correlation between investment bank rates and IPO pricing efficiency and underpricing level. There is a significant positive correlation between the turnover rate on the first day of listing and the level of IPO underpricing, which indicates that investor sentiment and its heterogeneity to issuers are an important factor affecting the underpricing level of IPO. Finally, on the basis of summarizing the relevant research conclusions, this paper puts forward the relevant policy recommendations from the two angles of guiding investors' rational pricing and strengthening the reputation mechanism of investment banks.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：復(fù)旦大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2013
【分類號(hào)】：F832.51;F224;F832.3
【參考文獻(xiàn)】
相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條
1 曹鳳岐;董秀良;;我國(guó)IPO定價(jià)合理性的實(shí)證分析[J];財(cái)經(jīng)研究;2006年06期
2 劉曉峰;李梅;;IPO詢價(jià)制在中美實(shí)施效果的比較及博弈分析[J];國(guó)際金融研究;2007年02期
3 郭泓;趙震宇;;承銷商聲譽(yù)對(duì)IPO公司定價(jià)、初始和長(zhǎng)期回報(bào)影響實(shí)證研究[J];管理世界;2006年03期
4 賈春新;劉力;;首次公開發(fā)行:從理論到實(shí)證[J];管理世界;2006年07期
5 韓立巖;伍燕然;;投資者情緒與IPOs之謎——抑價(jià)或者溢價(jià)[J];管理世界;2007年03期
6 朱紅軍;錢友文;;中國(guó)IPO高抑價(jià)之謎:“定價(jià)效率觀”還是“租金分配觀”?[J];管理世界;2010年06期
7 劉煜輝,熊鵬;股權(quán)分置、政府管制和中國(guó)IPO抑價(jià)[J];經(jīng)濟(jì)研究;2005年05期
8 邵新建;巫和懋;覃家琦;王道平;;中國(guó)IPO市場(chǎng)周期:基于投資者情緒與政府擇時(shí)發(fā)行的分析[J];金融研究;2010年11期
9 劉煜輝;沈可挺;;是一級(jí)市場(chǎng)抑價(jià),還是二級(jí)市場(chǎng)溢價(jià)——關(guān)于我國(guó)新股高抑價(jià)的一種檢驗(yàn)和一個(gè)解釋[J];金融研究;2011年11期
10 肖曙光;蔣順才;;我國(guó)A股市場(chǎng)高IPO抑價(jià)現(xiàn)象的制度因素分析[J];會(huì)計(jì)研究;2006年06期
相關(guān)博士學(xué)位論文 前2條
1 郭敏欣;我國(guó)A股市場(chǎng)新股抑價(jià)問題研究[D];中國(guó)社會(huì)科學(xué)院研究生院;2011年
2 宋書彬;中國(guó)IPO市場(chǎng)承銷商行為研究[D];東北財(cái)經(jīng)大學(xué);2011年
，本文編號(hào)：2250892
本文鏈接：http://sikaile.net/guanlilunwen/bankxd/2250892.html
最近更新
教材專著
