【摘要】：縱觀國(guó)際銀行業(yè)的發(fā)展歷程,眾多國(guó)際銀行巨頭都是通過不斷地跨國(guó)并購(gòu)而壯大自身的。中國(guó)商業(yè)銀行的跨國(guó)經(jīng)營(yíng),既是經(jīng)濟(jì)全球化和金融一體化的國(guó)際大環(huán)境的要求,也是我國(guó)經(jīng)濟(jì)國(guó)際化發(fā)展戰(zhàn)略的必然選擇�！昂蠼鹑谖C(jī)時(shí)代”國(guó)外金融機(jī)構(gòu)實(shí)力的削弱以及近年來人民幣不斷升值導(dǎo)致的跨國(guó)并購(gòu)成本降低,給我國(guó)商業(yè)銀行的跨國(guó)并購(gòu)創(chuàng)造了絕佳的機(jī)會(huì)。 本文首先回顧了商業(yè)銀行跨國(guó)并購(gòu)的動(dòng)因、方法、分支機(jī)構(gòu)的組織結(jié)構(gòu)選擇和績(jī)效評(píng)估的基礎(chǔ)理論,其中介紹了本文實(shí)證研究所使用的DEA方法的基礎(chǔ)理論、模型理論、優(yōu)勢(shì)與局限。接著本文回顧了近年來我國(guó)商業(yè)銀行跨國(guó)并購(gòu)的現(xiàn)狀。然后運(yùn)用DEA方法對(duì)中國(guó)工商銀行和招商銀行跨國(guó)并購(gòu)前后的經(jīng)營(yíng)效率進(jìn)行實(shí)證分析。實(shí)證結(jié)果顯示兩家銀行在跨國(guó)并購(gòu)后,總體效率都有一定程度的下降,但是招商銀行卻比工商銀行更迅速地恢復(fù)到了最優(yōu)效率。究其原因,筆者認(rèn)為與兩家銀行的體制、并購(gòu)目標(biāo)的選擇與整合方法的合理性有著密切的聯(lián)系。最后,本文從微觀與宏觀兩個(gè)方面對(duì)我國(guó)商業(yè)銀行的跨國(guó)并購(gòu)提出了對(duì)策與建議。
[Abstract]:Throughout the development of the international banking industry, many international banking giants are growing through continuous cross-border mergers and acquisitions. The transnational management of Chinese commercial banks is not only the requirement of the international environment of economic globalization and financial integration, but also the inevitable choice of our country's economic internationalization development strategy. The weakening of the strength of foreign financial institutions in the post-financial crisis era and the decrease in the cost of cross-border mergers and acquisitions caused by the continuous appreciation of the RMB in recent years have created an excellent opportunity for the cross-border mergers and acquisitions of commercial banks in China. This paper first reviews the motivation, methods, organizational structure selection and performance evaluation of commercial banks in cross-border mergers and acquisitions, and introduces the basic theory and model theory of the DEA method used in this empirical study. Advantages and limitations Then this paper reviews the status quo of cross-border mergers and acquisitions of commercial banks in China in recent years. Then we use DEA method to analyze the management efficiency of ICBC and CMB before and after cross-border M & A. The empirical results show that the overall efficiency of the two banks has declined to some extent after cross-border M & A, but China Merchants Bank has recovered to the optimal efficiency more quickly than ICBC. The author thinks that the choice of M & A target and the rationality of integration method are closely related to the system of the two banks. Finally, this paper puts forward the countermeasures and suggestions on cross-border M & A of commercial banks in China from micro and macro aspects.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：華東師范大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2013
【分類號(hào)】：F832.33

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前6條

1 李彬;;多角度審視中資銀行的跨國(guó)并購(gòu)[J];銀行家;2007年12期

2 許南;從并購(gòu)路徑看商業(yè)銀行跨國(guó)經(jīng)營(yíng)[J];金融論壇;2005年01期

3 戴昭;;基于曼奎斯特指數(shù)的我國(guó)商業(yè)銀行跨國(guó)并購(gòu)績(jī)效的實(shí)證研究[J];經(jīng)營(yíng)管理者;2010年05期

4 劉明坤;;我國(guó)商業(yè)銀行跨國(guó)經(jīng)營(yíng)新形勢(shì)及對(duì)策[J];銀行家;2011年05期

5 張健華;我國(guó)商業(yè)銀行效率研究的DEA方法及1997-2001年效率的實(shí)證分析[J];金融研究;2003年03期

6 黃憲;余丹;楊柳;;我國(guó)商業(yè)銀行X效率研究——基于DEA三階段模型的實(shí)證分析[J];數(shù)量經(jīng)濟(jì)技術(shù)經(jīng)濟(jì)研究;2008年07期

，

本文編號(hào)：2151456