發(fā)布時(shí)間：2018-06-22 23:18

  本文選題：銀行機(jī)構(gòu) + 太大不能倒��； 參考：《社會(huì)科學(xué)研究》2011年03期

【摘要】：美國(guó)新的金融監(jiān)管法案針對(duì)金融危機(jī)提出了應(yīng)對(duì)金融機(jī)構(gòu)"太大不能倒"的解決方案。盡管有人認(rèn)為"太大不能倒"并不是反壟斷問(wèn)題,但在銀行業(yè)的反壟斷法適用中不能回避的問(wèn)題就是銀行機(jī)構(gòu)的"太大不能倒"。面對(duì)"太大不能倒"各國(guó)反壟斷執(zhí)法的變化對(duì)于我國(guó)金融機(jī)構(gòu)的反壟斷執(zhí)法也起到一定借鑒作用。針對(duì)我國(guó)銀行業(yè)的發(fā)展現(xiàn)狀,對(duì)銀行業(yè)的反壟斷執(zhí)法應(yīng)是結(jié)構(gòu)規(guī)制與行為規(guī)制相結(jié)合。
[Abstract]:The new U.S. Financial Regulation Act offers a solution to the financial crisis that financial institutions are "too big to fail." Although some people think that "too big to fail" is not an antitrust issue, but in the application of the banking anti-monopoly law can not be avoided is the banking institutions "too big can not fail." In the face of "too big to fail", the changes of anti-monopoly law enforcement in various countries also play a certain reference role in the anti-monopoly law enforcement of our financial institutions. In view of the present situation of the banking industry in China, the anti-monopoly law enforcement of the banking industry should be a combination of structural regulation and behavioral regulation.
【作者單位】： 上海政法學(xué)院經(jīng)濟(jì)法系;
【基金】：上海市教委經(jīng)濟(jì)法重點(diǎn)學(xué)科建設(shè)項(xiàng)目(J52101);上海市教委科研創(chuàng)新項(xiàng)目(11YS276)
【分類號(hào)】：D922.294;F832.3

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前2條

1 霍洪濤;論金融控股公司的反壟斷法律問(wèn)題[J];金融理論與實(shí)踐;2005年08期

2 游國(guó)城;鄭賽花;;論反壟斷法適用豁免制度[J];重慶工商大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2006年04期

【共引文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前2條

1 唐鵬;我國(guó)金融控股公司外部監(jiān)管模式探析[D];西南財(cái)經(jīng)大學(xué);2006年

2 金e，

本文編號(hào)：2054642