發(fā)布時間：2018-05-12 02:03

  本文選題：效率 + 數(shù)據(jù)包絡(luò)分析　； 參考：《華南理工大學》2013年碩士論文

【摘要】：自從中國加入世貿(mào)組織以來，政府積極推動金融市場化與國際化，陸續(xù)解除多項金融管制，并采取一系列的金融改革措施，先后開放了多種金融業(yè)務。當前我國商業(yè)銀行面臨著前所未有的激烈競爭，中國的商業(yè)銀行在發(fā)展與改革過程中也存在許多問題。加上金融危機的蔓延、我國經(jīng)濟增長減速等重大因素影響下，近幾年許多行業(yè)和領(lǐng)域陷入困境，這些風險將通過多種渠道傳導到銀行，使得銀行面臨嚴峻的信用風險和市場風險。面對復雜的經(jīng)濟環(huán)境、激烈的競爭以及多樣化的市場需求，中國商業(yè)銀行對其效率進行科學的測度并做出客觀準確的評析，具有十分重要的理論和現(xiàn)實意義。 本文首先在借鑒前人研究的基礎(chǔ)上，從銀行的經(jīng)營特點出發(fā)，構(gòu)建了商業(yè)銀行績效評價指標體系，并分析各項指標的相互影響關(guān)系，從而構(gòu)建了網(wǎng)絡(luò)層次分析（ANP）模型，并借助Super Decisions軟件計算得到指標權(quán)重�；贏NP的評價結(jié)果，計算銀行的盈利性、流動性、安全性、發(fā)展性和創(chuàng)新性的指標得分，將該五個指標作為數(shù)據(jù)包絡(luò)分析（DEA）的產(chǎn)出變量，進而分析中國17家商業(yè)銀行在2009~2011年的經(jīng)營效率。通過結(jié)合ANP和DEA兩種方法，有效解決了傳統(tǒng)DEA選取產(chǎn)出指標隨意性大、相關(guān)性大且不足以體現(xiàn)銀行整體績效的缺點，使得商業(yè)銀行的經(jīng)營效率評價更加科學和準確。同時將ANP-DEA方法得到的效率值，與采用傳統(tǒng)產(chǎn)出指標的DEA方法得到的效率值進行對比，發(fā)現(xiàn)后者高估了中國商業(yè)銀行特別是國有銀行的效率，原因是后者大大高估了銀行的規(guī)模效率。本文提出的ANP-DEA方法，能識別出更多無效率的銀行，，并且從純技術(shù)效率、規(guī)模效率以及產(chǎn)出的角度，更加全面地分析各銀行無效率產(chǎn)生的原因，從而給經(jīng)營者一定的參考價值。
[Abstract]:Since China's accession to the WTO, the government has actively promoted the marketization and internationalization of finance, lifted many financial controls one after another, and adopted a series of financial reform measures, opening up a variety of financial businesses one after another. At present, China's commercial banks are facing unprecedented fierce competition, and there are many problems in the process of development and reform of Chinese commercial banks. In addition to the spread of the financial crisis and the impact of major factors such as the slowdown in economic growth in our country, in recent years many industries and fields have fallen into difficulties. These risks will be transmitted to banks through various channels. It makes banks face severe credit risk and market risk. In the face of complex economic environment, fierce competition and diversified market demand, it is of great theoretical and practical significance for Chinese commercial banks to measure their efficiency scientifically and make objective and accurate evaluation. First of all, based on the previous studies, this paper constructs the performance evaluation index system of commercial banks, and analyzes the mutual influence of each index, and then constructs the ANPs model of network hierarchy analysis (NAHP), which is based on the management characteristics of commercial banks. The index weight is calculated by Super Decisions software. Based on the evaluation results of ANP, the bank's profitability, liquidity, security, development and innovative index scores are calculated, and the five indicators are used as the output variables of data Envelopment Analysis (DEA). Then it analyzes the operating efficiency of 17 commercial banks in China from 2009 to 2011. By combining ANP and DEA, this paper effectively solves the shortcomings of traditional DEA in selecting output index which is random, relevant and not enough to reflect the overall performance of banks, which makes the evaluation of operational efficiency of commercial banks more scientific and accurate. At the same time, comparing the efficiency value obtained by ANP-DEA method with that obtained by DEA method using traditional output indicators, it is found that the latter overestimates the efficiency of Chinese commercial banks, especially state-owned banks. The reason is that the latter greatly overestimated the efficiency of the size of the bank. The ANP-DEA method proposed in this paper can identify more inefficient banks, and from the point of view of pure technical efficiency, scale efficiency and output, more comprehensive analysis of the causes of bank inefficiency, thus providing certain reference value to managers.
【學位授予單位】：華南理工大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2013
【分類號】：F832.33

【參考文獻】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 曲彤工;李志勇;連晨浩;;中國商業(yè)銀行財務競爭力的評價研究[J];財經(jīng)理論與實踐;2008年03期

2 龐瑞芝;張艷;薛偉;;中國上市銀行經(jīng)營效率的影響因素——基于Tobit回歸模型的二階段分析[J];金融論壇;2007年10期

3 黃德春;馬慧妍;劉炳勝;;商業(yè)銀行競爭力評價——基于ANP模型的研究[J];金融論壇;2010年12期

4 朱南,卓賢,董屹;關(guān)于我國國有商業(yè)銀行效率的實證分析與改革策略[J];管理世界;2004年02期

5 遲國泰;董賀超;楊德;劉軼芳;;基于AHP的國有商業(yè)銀行競爭力評價研究[J];管理學報;2005年06期

6 遲國泰;鄭杏果;楊中原;;基于主成分分析的國有商業(yè)銀行競爭力評價研究[J];管理學報;2009年02期

7 蔣浩;紀延光;聶銳;;我國銀行業(yè)技術(shù)效率演進的實證分析[J];管理學報;2009年06期

8 郭翠榮;劉亮;;基于因子分析法的我國上市商業(yè)銀行競爭力評價研究[J];管理世界;2012年01期

9 錢海婷;;基于平衡計分卡的商業(yè)銀行經(jīng)營績效層次分析[J];陜西理工學院學報(社會科學版);2009年04期

10 徐傳諶;齊樹天;;中國商業(yè)銀行X-效率實證研究[J];經(jīng)濟研究;2007年03期

本文編號：1876613