本文選題：知識產權沖突　切入點：沖突立法與實踐　出處：《暨南大學》2013年碩士論文

【摘要】：我國內地與港澳知識產權沖突的存在有其特定的歷史、經濟、文化等原因，不論是在知識產權的實體法方面還是程序法方面內地與港澳的知識產權制度都存在差異，在實質上制約著區(qū)域間的經濟交流合作�；浉郯母o密合作區(qū)的建立和實現(xiàn)要求在實踐中建立一套從根本上解決知識產權沖突的協(xié)調機制。通過邏輯分析和比較分析，借鑒國際上的先進經驗，設想在我國粵港澳地區(qū)進行先試，法律先行，從《憲法》、《立法法》、《地方組織法》等從上到下的法律賦予地方政府簽訂此類協(xié)議的權利，并對其生效條件、生效程序、爭端解決等做出原則性和相對具體性的規(guī)定。同時輔之以一套相對完整的協(xié)調機構，，即建立一套包含有決策機構、常設機構、爭端解決機構等在內的完善機構組織，輔之以優(yōu)先權制度、轉換申請制度和專門法院管轄等制度的復式知識產權制度，同時充分發(fā)揮專業(yè)團體以及民間組織的作用，以期望為解決我國內地與港澳知識產權沖突提供幫助。
[Abstract]:There are specific historical, economic and cultural reasons for the existence of the intellectual property conflict between Hong Kong and Macao in China's mainland, and there are differences in the intellectual property rights system between the mainland and Hong Kong and Macao, both in substantive and procedural aspects of intellectual property rights. The establishment and realization of a closer cooperation zone between Guangdong, Hong Kong and Macao requires the establishment and implementation of a set of coordination mechanisms to fundamentally resolve intellectual property conflicts in practice. Through logical analysis and comparative analysis, Drawing on advanced international experience, it is envisaged that the local governments will be given the right to sign such agreements from the Constitution, the Legislative Law, the Local Organization Law, and other top-down laws in Guangdong, Hong Kong, and Macao. And to make provisions of principle and relative specificity on the conditions for its entry into force, procedures for entry into force, dispute settlement, etc., supplemented by a relatively complete coordinating body, that is, to establish a set of permanent bodies consisting of decision-making bodies, Perfect institutional organizations, such as dispute settlement bodies, are complemented by a system of priority, a system of conversion applications and a system of dual intellectual property rights such as the jurisdiction of specialized courts, and at the same time give full play to the role of professional organizations and civil society organizations. In order to help resolve the intellectual property conflicts between mainland China and Hong Kong and Macao.
【學位授予單位】：暨南大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2013
【分類號】：D923.4

【參考文獻】

相關期刊論文 前8條

1 李正華;中美知識產權制度比較研究[J];比較法研究;2003年02期

2 周素紅;陳慧瑋;;美國大都市區(qū)規(guī)劃組織的區(qū)域協(xié)調機制及其對中國的啟示[J];國際城市規(guī)劃;2008年06期

3 王錫麟;歐共體知識產權跨國法律保護體制的分析[J];華東科技;1998年08期

4 郭玉軍;徐錦堂;;中國區(qū)際法律沖突解決路徑探析(上)[J];時代法學;2008年01期

5 馮心明;;CEPA框架下內地與港澳知識產權法律沖突與解決[J];暨南學報(哲學社會科學版);2008年01期

6 何淵;;我國區(qū)域協(xié)調發(fā)展的法制困境與解決路徑[J];南京社會科學;2009年11期

7 王暢;鄧媛;;內地與香港在CEPA框架下的知識產權法律問題初析[J];中國科技信息;2006年16期

8 朱雪忠,柳福東;歐盟商標法律制度的協(xié)調機制及其對我國的啟示[J];中國法學;2001年04期

本文編號：1655049