本文選題：知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)沖突　切入點(diǎn)：沖突立法與實(shí)踐　出處：《暨南大學(xué)》2013年碩士論文

【摘要】：我國(guó)內(nèi)地與港澳知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)沖突的存在有其特定的歷史、經(jīng)濟(jì)、文化等原因，不論是在知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)的實(shí)體法方面還是程序法方面內(nèi)地與港澳的知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)制度都存在差異，在實(shí)質(zhì)上制約著區(qū)域間的經(jīng)濟(jì)交流合作。粵港澳更緊密合作區(qū)的建立和實(shí)現(xiàn)要求在實(shí)踐中建立一套從根本上解決知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)沖突的協(xié)調(diào)機(jī)制。通過(guò)邏輯分析和比較分析，借鑒國(guó)際上的先進(jìn)經(jīng)驗(yàn)，設(shè)想在我國(guó)粵港澳地區(qū)進(jìn)行先試，法律先行，從《憲法》、《立法法》、《地方組織法》等從上到下的法律賦予地方政府簽訂此類協(xié)議的權(quán)利，并對(duì)其生效條件、生效程序、爭(zhēng)端解決等做出原則性和相對(duì)具體性的規(guī)定。同時(shí)輔之以一套相對(duì)完整的協(xié)調(diào)機(jī)構(gòu)，，即建立一套包含有決策機(jī)構(gòu)、常設(shè)機(jī)構(gòu)、爭(zhēng)端解決機(jī)構(gòu)等在內(nèi)的完善機(jī)構(gòu)組織，輔之以優(yōu)先權(quán)制度、轉(zhuǎn)換申請(qǐng)制度和專門法院管轄等制度的復(fù)式知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)制度，同時(shí)充分發(fā)揮專業(yè)團(tuán)體以及民間組織的作用，以期望為解決我國(guó)內(nèi)地與港澳知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)沖突提供幫助。
[Abstract]:There are specific historical, economic and cultural reasons for the existence of the intellectual property conflict between Hong Kong and Macao in China's mainland, and there are differences in the intellectual property rights system between the mainland and Hong Kong and Macao, both in substantive and procedural aspects of intellectual property rights. The establishment and realization of a closer cooperation zone between Guangdong, Hong Kong and Macao requires the establishment and implementation of a set of coordination mechanisms to fundamentally resolve intellectual property conflicts in practice. Through logical analysis and comparative analysis, Drawing on advanced international experience, it is envisaged that the local governments will be given the right to sign such agreements from the Constitution, the Legislative Law, the Local Organization Law, and other top-down laws in Guangdong, Hong Kong, and Macao. And to make provisions of principle and relative specificity on the conditions for its entry into force, procedures for entry into force, dispute settlement, etc., supplemented by a relatively complete coordinating body, that is, to establish a set of permanent bodies consisting of decision-making bodies, Perfect institutional organizations, such as dispute settlement bodies, are complemented by a system of priority, a system of conversion applications and a system of dual intellectual property rights such as the jurisdiction of specialized courts, and at the same time give full play to the role of professional organizations and civil society organizations. In order to help resolve the intellectual property conflicts between mainland China and Hong Kong and Macao.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：暨南大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2013
【分類號(hào)】：D923.4

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前8條

1 李正華;中美知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)制度比較研究[J];比較法研究;2003年02期

2 周素紅;陳慧瑋;;美國(guó)大都市區(qū)規(guī)劃組織的區(qū)域協(xié)調(diào)機(jī)制及其對(duì)中國(guó)的啟示[J];國(guó)際城市規(guī)劃;2008年06期

3 王錫麟;歐共體知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)跨國(guó)法律保護(hù)體制的分析[J];華東科技;1998年08期

4 郭玉軍;徐錦堂;;中國(guó)區(qū)際法律沖突解決路徑探析(上)[J];時(shí)代法學(xué);2008年01期

5 馮心明;;CEPA框架下內(nèi)地與港澳知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)法律沖突與解決[J];暨南學(xué)報(bào)(哲學(xué)社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2008年01期

6 何淵;;我國(guó)區(qū)域協(xié)調(diào)發(fā)展的法制困境與解決路徑[J];南京社會(huì)科學(xué);2009年11期

7 王暢;鄧媛;;內(nèi)地與香港在CEPA框架下的知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)法律問(wèn)題初析[J];中國(guó)科技信息;2006年16期

8 朱雪忠,柳福東;歐盟商標(biāo)法律制度的協(xié)調(diào)機(jī)制及其對(duì)我國(guó)的啟示[J];中國(guó)法學(xué);2001年04期

本文編號(hào)：1655049