本文選題：傳統(tǒng)工藝　切入點：知識產(chǎn)權(quán)　出處：《華僑大學(xué)》2013年碩士論文　論文類型：學(xué)位論文

【摘要】：我國有著上下五千年的悠久歷史，對于這樣一個積淀深厚的國家而言，傳統(tǒng)工藝可謂是其文化中不可小覷的組成部分。傳統(tǒng)工藝作為我國非物質(zhì)文化遺產(chǎn)的重要組成部分，不僅具有重要的歷史文化意義，同時其保護現(xiàn)狀更能夠體現(xiàn)知識產(chǎn)權(quán)法在我國的完善程度。在對傳統(tǒng)工藝進行保護的過程中，一方面要注重對其內(nèi)涵、形態(tài)的保護，使其盡可能完整地流傳下來；另一方面則需要關(guān)注對傳統(tǒng)工藝的法律保護，在此尤其指的是知識產(chǎn)權(quán)方面的法律保護。對傳統(tǒng)工藝進行知識產(chǎn)權(quán)保護，首先不可回避地需要立法對其加以規(guī)范，從根本上奠定理論基礎(chǔ)；其次則要對執(zhí)法、司法等各個部門各個環(huán)節(jié)進行調(diào)節(jié)，以使工作得到更為有力的貫徹；最后則要立足于整個社會范圍內(nèi)的可接受程度，即要求我們從群眾的心理出發(fā)，從社會最為廣大的人群中入手，，通過增強他們的法律觀點和權(quán)利意識來達(dá)到保護知識產(chǎn)權(quán)的最終目的。 目前，國際上運用知識產(chǎn)權(quán)來保護傳統(tǒng)工藝的先例有很多，而且伴隨著一系列知識產(chǎn)權(quán)國際公約的出臺，發(fā)達(dá)國家越來越注重加強對其本國的傳統(tǒng)工藝技術(shù)的知識產(chǎn)權(quán)保護。反觀我國保護傳統(tǒng)工藝的現(xiàn)狀，沒有對保護制度進行完善，有些地方處于缺失的狀態(tài)，沒有開展相應(yīng)的立法工作，致使我國保護傳統(tǒng)工藝的力度顯得十分匱乏，處于一種無法可依的境地。學(xué)界對于傳統(tǒng)工藝保護的相關(guān)基礎(chǔ)理論和概念還未進行權(quán)威的界定，導(dǎo)致在此領(lǐng)域中存在著許多爭議的問題。文章將從知識產(chǎn)權(quán)的角度出發(fā)，重點對保護傳統(tǒng)工藝的現(xiàn)有知識產(chǎn)權(quán)制度存在的不足進行論證，通過比較傳統(tǒng)工藝與發(fā)明、商業(yè)秘密之間的區(qū)別，從而在現(xiàn)有知識產(chǎn)權(quán)制度的框架下進行進一步完善，進而綜合全面地保護傳統(tǒng)工藝。 因此，本文的寫作過程主要通過運用搜集資料、匯總整理、對比分析等方式，首先在現(xiàn)有理論學(xué)說中對保護知識產(chǎn)權(quán)的相關(guān)觀點進行整理合并，其次在上述分析的基礎(chǔ)上結(jié)合我國保護傳統(tǒng)工藝的實際加以探討，并且適當(dāng)引入國外相關(guān)的立法實踐，最后得出合理性的結(jié)論，并為今后我國知識產(chǎn)公保護傳統(tǒng)工藝的發(fā)展提供切實可行的意見建議，從而在全社會范圍內(nèi)促進知識產(chǎn)權(quán)法的推廣和落實。
[Abstract]:China has a long history of five thousand years, for such a country with deep accumulation, traditional craft can be said to be an important part of its culture. As an important part of China's intangible cultural heritage, traditional craft is an important part of China's intangible cultural heritage. It not only has important historical and cultural significance, but also can reflect the perfection of intellectual property law in our country. In the process of protecting traditional craft, on the one hand, we should pay attention to the protection of its connotation and form. To enable it to remain as complete as possible; on the other hand, attention needs to be paid to the legal protection of traditional processes, in particular in the area of intellectual property rights... intellectual property protection of traditional processes, First of all, it needs to be regulated by legislation, so as to lay the theoretical foundation fundamentally. Secondly, it is necessary to regulate the various links of law enforcement, judicial and other departments so as to make the work more effective. Finally, we should base ourselves on the acceptability of the whole society, that is, we should proceed from the psychology of the masses and from among the largest groups of people in society. The ultimate goal of intellectual property protection is to enhance their legal views and awareness of rights. At present, there are many precedents for the international use of intellectual property rights to protect traditional arts and crafts, and with the publication of a series of international conventions on intellectual property rights, Developed countries are paying more and more attention to strengthening the protection of intellectual property rights for their own traditional craft technologies. In contrast, the current situation of protecting traditional crafts in China has not been improved, and some places are in a state of lack. Due to the lack of relevant legislative work, the strength of protecting traditional craft in our country is very short, and it is in a situation that can not be relied upon. The academic circles have not defined the relevant basic theories and concepts of traditional process protection with authority. There are many controversial problems in this field. From the point of view of intellectual property rights, this paper will focus on demonstrating the shortcomings of the existing intellectual property system of protecting traditional processes, and comparing traditional processes with inventions. The difference between trade secrets can be further improved under the existing intellectual property system, and the traditional technology can be protected comprehensively. Therefore, the writing process of this paper mainly through the use of data collection, summary, comparative analysis and other methods, first of all, in the existing theory of intellectual property rights protection related views to collate and merge. Secondly, on the basis of the above analysis, combining with the practice of protecting the traditional technology in our country, and introducing the relevant legislative practice of foreign countries appropriately, the conclusion of reasonableness is drawn. It also provides practical suggestions for the development of the traditional technology for the protection of knowledge production and public protection in China in order to promote the popularization and implementation of intellectual property law in the whole society.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：華僑大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2013
【分類號】：D923.4

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前9條

1 華覺明;;傳統(tǒng)工藝的研究、保護和振興[J];中國文化遺產(chǎn);2004年03期

2 宋紅松;傳統(tǒng)知識與知識產(chǎn)權(quán)[J];電子知識產(chǎn)權(quán);2003年03期

3 劉華,雷群安;論民間文學(xué)藝術(shù)的版權(quán)保護[J];佛山科學(xué)技術(shù)學(xué)院學(xué)報(社會科學(xué)版);2004年02期

4 程慧釗;民間文學(xué)藝術(shù)若干法律問題研究[J];法學(xué)雜志;2004年05期

5 張旭波;蔡萍;;協(xié)會在傳統(tǒng)知識保護中的特殊作用[J];中國發(fā)明與專利;2006年08期

6 王莉霞;陳榮婕;許中媛;;非物質(zhì)文化遺產(chǎn)知識產(chǎn)權(quán)保護研究進展[J];人文地理;2009年05期

7 戴魁;張翼;;芻議河北省非物質(zhì)文化遺產(chǎn)的發(fā)掘與保護——從內(nèi)丘紙馬藝術(shù)的發(fā)掘與保護談起[J];社會科學(xué)論壇(學(xué)術(shù)研究卷);2008年08期

8 李祖明;民間文學(xué)藝術(shù)表達(dá)形式法律保護之我見[J];思想戰(zhàn)線;1996年02期

9 李硯祖;;物質(zhì)與非物質(zhì):傳統(tǒng)工藝美術(shù)的保護與發(fā)展[J];文藝研究;2006年12期

本文編號：1651054