本文選題：刑法 + 變通實施��； 參考：《江西社會科學》2017年07期

【摘要】：《刑法》第90條確立了刑法變通實施權,學界對該權利存在誤讀,主要原因在于對該權利性質認識不清�！缎谭ā返�90條是立法者綜合考慮我國少數(shù)民族社會發(fā)展不平衡、民族平等理論政策及立法質量三方面因素后作出的規(guī)定,其受權主體有明顯的特殊性。法律變通實施權在確立之初的性質是地方立法權,此后法律變通實施權中的一部分開始向立法自治權轉變,但刑法變通實施權一直未做改變。將刑法變通實施權調整為國家立法權,由全國人大常委會制定單行刑法來解決刑法變通實施問題是一種新的思路。
[Abstract]:Article 90 of the Criminal Law establishes the right of alternative implementation of criminal law, and the academic circles misread the right, the main reason is that the nature of the right is not clear. Article 90 of the Criminal Law is a comprehensive consideration by legislators of the imbalance of the development of the minority society in our country. The authorized subject of the national equality theory, policy and legislation quality has obvious particularity. The nature of the power of enforcement of legal adaptation at the beginning of its establishment is local legislative power. Since then, part of the power of enforcement of adaptation of law has begun to change to the power of legislative autonomy, but the power of enforcement of alternative enforcement of criminal law has not been changed. It is a new way to adjust the power of flexible implementation of criminal law to the power of national legislation and to make a single criminal law by the standing Committee of the National people's Congress to solve the problem of flexible implementation of criminal law.
【作者單位】： 湘潭大學法學院;湖南人文科技學院;
【基金】：博士后基金面上資助項目“村規(guī)民約司法適用問題研究”(2017M612570) 湖南省哲學社會科學青年項目“民族地區(qū)村規(guī)民約實證研究”(15YBA221)
【分類號】：D924.1
，

本文編號：2026283