本文選題：安樂(lè)死 + 生命權(quán)��； 參考：《內(nèi)蒙古大學(xué)》2013年碩士論文

【摘要】：20世紀(jì)以來(lái),安樂(lè)死問(wèn)題一直在世界范圍內(nèi)激烈論爭(zhēng)著。伴隨著各種關(guān)于安樂(lè)死的醫(yī)療案例和法律案件的發(fā)生,安樂(lè)死立法成為各國(guó)法學(xué)界無(wú)法回避的議題。少數(shù)國(guó)家已經(jīng)走在了安樂(lè)死立法的前列,通過(guò)安樂(lè)死法案,承認(rèn)法律規(guī)范的安樂(lè)死行為合法。當(dāng)今,我國(guó)未對(duì)安樂(lè)死立法,其合法性并未得到憲法的保護(hù)。本文在厘清安樂(lè)死概念的基礎(chǔ)上,通過(guò)對(duì)國(guó)內(nèi)外安樂(lè)死立法現(xiàn)狀及司法現(xiàn)狀的研究,得出我國(guó)已經(jīng)初步形成了安樂(lè)死立法的環(huán)境。本文從憲法學(xué)學(xué)理角度,對(duì)安樂(lè)死立法與憲法規(guī)定的道德標(biāo)準(zhǔn)進(jìn)行闡述,對(duì)安樂(lè)死立法與憲法基本權(quán)利之生命權(quán)之間的問(wèn)題進(jìn)行論證,從憲法理論層面確定安樂(lè)死立法的合憲性。對(duì)世界上一些國(guó)家的安樂(lè)死立法現(xiàn)狀加以陳述后,本文又對(duì)安樂(lè)死立法經(jīng)歷的合憲性爭(zhēng)議加以論述。安樂(lè)死立法合憲性過(guò)程中經(jīng)歷的爭(zhēng)議表現(xiàn)為多種多樣,諸如安樂(lè)死概念的模糊性,對(duì)生命權(quán)內(nèi)容是否包含生命自主權(quán)的理解不同,安樂(lè)死行為對(duì)社會(huì)危害性的大小,以及可能存在的安樂(lè)死的濫用和滑坡情況的控制成效等等。對(duì)于該爭(zhēng)議過(guò)程中種種問(wèn)題的解決,本文歸納為,在安樂(lè)死立法過(guò)程中,需要以嚴(yán)謹(jǐn)?shù)膽B(tài)度正確認(rèn)識(shí)安樂(lè)死行為,結(jié)合已有經(jīng)驗(yàn)及具體國(guó)情采取合理合法的方式與程序。從理論到實(shí)踐需要理性的思考,本文認(rèn)為安樂(lè)死立法進(jìn)程中基于我國(guó)現(xiàn)實(shí)基礎(chǔ)必須要注意幾個(gè)問(wèn)題,詳見(jiàn)正文。當(dāng)然立法過(guò)程中少不了立法原則的限制,即恪守生命權(quán)原則、知情自愿原則和正當(dāng)法律程序原則。
[Abstract]:Since the 20 th century, euthanasia has been a heated debate all over the world. With the occurrence of various medical cases and legal cases about euthanasia, euthanasia legislation has become an unavoidable issue in the field of law. A few countries have been in the forefront of euthanasia legislation, the adoption of euthanasia acts, legal norms of euthanasia legal. At present, our country has not legislated on euthanasia, and its legitimacy has not been protected by the constitution. On the basis of clarifying the concept of euthanasia, this paper studies the current situation of euthanasia legislation and judicial status at home and abroad, and concludes that the environment of euthanasia legislation has been initially formed in China. From the perspective of constitutional jurisprudence, this paper expounds the moral standards stipulated in euthanasia legislation and constitution, and demonstrates the problems between euthanasia legislation and the right to life of the basic constitutional rights. The constitutionality of euthanasia legislation is determined from the angle of constitutional theory. After stating the current situation of euthanasia legislation in some countries in the world, this paper discusses the constitutionality controversy of euthanasia legislation. In the process of constitutionality of euthanasia legislation, there are many kinds of controversies, such as the ambiguity of euthanasia concept, the different understanding of whether the content of the right to life includes life autonomy, the harm of euthanasia behavior to the society. And the possible abuse of euthanasia and landslide control and so on. In the process of euthanasia legislation, it is necessary to correctly understand euthanasia behavior with strict attitude and adopt reasonable and legal methods and procedures in combination with existing experience and specific national conditions. From theory to practice, the author thinks that in the process of euthanasia legislation, we must pay attention to several problems based on the reality of our country, see the text for details. Of course, there must be limitations of legislative principles in the legislative process, that is, abide by the principle of right to life, the principle of voluntary informed and due process of law.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：內(nèi)蒙古大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2013
【分類(lèi)號(hào)】：D921

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前4條

1 王鍇;;安樂(lè)死的憲法學(xué)思考[J];法律與醫(yī)學(xué)雜志;2006年02期

2 劉三木,汪再祥;關(guān)于安樂(lè)死的若干爭(zhēng)議問(wèn)題之討論[J];法學(xué)評(píng)論;2004年06期

3 徐小冰;人權(quán)沖突及人權(quán)的協(xié)調(diào)實(shí)現(xiàn)[J];法學(xué);2005年11期

4 何農(nóng);龐寧;;淺析安樂(lè)死——以浙江地區(qū)730例調(diào)查為基礎(chǔ)[J];法制與社會(huì);2009年19期

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前2條

1 葉清e(cuò)，

本文編號(hào)：1837895